159 research outputs found
GPs' implicit prioritization through clinical choices â evidence from three national health services
Acknowledgments The authors are grateful for valuable comments and inputs from participants at a series of seminars and conferences as well as to our three anonymous referees.Peer reviewedPostprin
Context dependency and consumer acceptance of risk reducing strategies - a choice experiment study on salmonella risks in pork
Is Embedding Entailed in Consumer Valuation of Food Safety Characteristics?
Consumersâ preferences for food safety characteristics are investigated with particular focus on existence of an embedding effect. Embedding exists if consumer valuation of food safety is insensitive to scope. Two choice experiments have been conducted valuing food safety in respectively minced pork and chicken breasts, exemplified by avoiding human risks of Salmonella infections and strengthening the restrictions of using antibiotics in the pork production and in terms of avoiding human risks of Salmonella and Campylobacter infections respectively. The results showed no indications of an embedding effect between the food safety characteristics, in neither of the cases.Valuation, Choice Experiment, Market Goods, Food Safety, Embedding., Agricultural and Food Policy, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety,
The relative value of different QALY types
The oft-applied assumption in the use of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in economic evaluation, that all QALYs are valued equally, has been questioned from the outset. The literature has focused on differential values of a QALY based on equity considerations such as the characteristics of the beneficiaries of the QALYs. However, a key characteristic which may affect the value of a QALY is the type of QALY itself. QALY gains can be generated purely by gains in survival, purely by improvements in quality of life, or by changes in both. Using a discrete choice experiment and a new methodological approach to the derivation of relative weights, we undertake the first direct and systematic exploration of the relative weight accorded different QALY types and do so in the presence of equity considerations; age and severity. Results provide new evidence against the normative starting point that all QALYs are valued equally.This study was funded by an Australian National Health
and Medical Research Council project grant APP1047788
How does HPV vaccination status relate to risk perceptions and intention to participate in cervical screening?:a survey study
Abstract Background Women in several countries will soon be covered by two preventive programmes targeting cervical cancer: HPV vaccination and cervical screening. The HPV vaccines are expected to prevent approximately 70Â % of cervical cancers. It has been speculated, that HPV vaccinated women will not attend screening because they falsely think that the vaccine has eliminated their cervical cancer risk. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between HPV vaccination status and perceptions of cervical cancer risk; perceptions of vaccine effect; and intention to participate in cervical screening. Furthermore, to investigate associations between perceptions of cervical cancer risk and intention to participate in cervical screening. Methods A random sample of Danish women from the birth cohorts 1993â1995 was invited to complete a web-based questionnaire concerning risk perceptions and intentions to participate in cervical screening. Main outcomes were: perceived lifetime-risk of cervical cancer; perceived HPV vaccine effect; and intention to participate in cervical screening. Results HPV vaccinated women more often than unvaccinated women intended to participate in screening: adjusted odds ratio (OR) for being HPV vaccinated when intending to participate in screening of 3.89 (95Â % CI: 2.50â6.06). HPV vaccinated women perceived cervical cancer risk to be higher than unvaccinated women did: adjusted OR of 0.11 (95Â % CI: 0.03â0.39) and 0.51 (95Â % CI: 0.33â0.78) for being HPV vaccinated while having the lowest perception of risk (in two different pre-specified dichotomisations). HPV vaccinated women perceived the vaccine effect to be larger than unvaccinated women did: adjusted OR of 0.31 (95Â % CI: 0.18â0.51) and 0.37 (95Â % CI: 0.25â0.53) for being HPV vaccinated while having the lowest perception of vaccine effect (in two different pre-specified dichotomisations). There were no associations between perceived cervical cancer risk and intention to participate in screening. Conclusions HPV vaccinated women more often than unvaccinated women intended to participate in screening and they perceived cervical cancer risk to be higher and the vaccine effect to be larger than unvaccinated women did. However, in our analyses, risk perceptions could not explain screening intentions neither among vaccinated nor among unvaccinated women
Societal views on orphan drugs: cross sectional survey of Norwegians aged 40 to 67
Objective To determine whether a general societal preference for prioritising treatment of rare diseases over common ones exists and could provide a justification for accepting higher cost effectiveness thresholds for orphan drugs
Public versus patient health preferences:protocol for a study to elicit EQ-5D-5L health state valuations for patients who have survived a stay in intensive care
INTRODUCTION: The value set used when calculating quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) is most often based on stated preference data elicited from a representative sample of the general population. However, having a severe disease may alter a personâs health preferences, which may imply that, for some patient groups, experienced QALYs may differ from those that are estimated via standard methods. This study aims to model 5-level EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) valuations based on preferences elicited from a sample of patients who have survived a stay in a Danish intensive care unit (ICU) and to compare these with the preferences of the general population. Further, the heterogeneity in the ICU patientsâ preferences will be investigated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This valuation study will elicit EQ-5D-5L health state preferences from a sample of 300 respondents enrolled in two randomised controlled trials at Danish ICUs. Patientsâ preferences will be elicited using composite time trade-off based on the EuroQol Valuation Technology, the same as that used to generate the EQ-5D-5L value set for the Danish general population. The patient-based and the public-based EQ-5D-5L valuations will be compared. Potential underlying determinants of the ICU preferences will be investigated through analyses of demographic characteristics, time since the ICU stay, self-reported health, willingness to trade-off length of life for quality of life, health state reference dependency and EQ-5D dimensions that patients have experienced themselves during their illness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Under Danish regulations, ethical approval is not required for studies of this type. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at national and international conferences. The modelling algorithms will be publicly available for statistical software, such as Stata and R
- âŚ