Systematic screening versus clinical gestalt in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department.

BackgroundDiagnosing concomitant pulmonary embolism (PE) in COVID-19 patients remains challenging. As such, PE may be overlooked. We compared the diagnostic yield of systematic PE-screening based on the YEARS-algorithm to PE-screening based on clinical gestalt in emergency department (ED) patients with COVID-19.MethodsWe included all ED patients who were admitted because of COVID-19 between March 2020 and February 2021. Patients already receiving anticoagulant treatment were excluded. Up to April 7, 2020, the decision to perform CT-pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was based on physician's clinical gestalt (clinical gestalt cohort). From April 7 onwards, systematic PE-screening was performed by CTPA if D-dimer level was ≥1000 ug/L, or ≥500 ug/L in case of ≥1 YEARS-item (systematic screening cohort).Results1095 ED patients with COVID-19 were admitted. After applying exclusion criteria, 289 were included in the clinical gestalt and 574 in the systematic screening cohort. The number of PE diagnoses was significantly higher in the systematic screening cohort compared to the clinical gestalt cohort: 8.2% vs. 1.0% (3/289 vs. 47/574; p100 mg/L (OR 2.78, 95%CI 1.37-5.66, p = 0.005) were independently associated with PE.ConclusionIn ED patients with COVID-19, the number of PE diagnosis was significantly higher in the cohort that underwent systematic PE screening based on the YEARS-algorithm in comparison with the clinical gestalt cohort, with a number needed to test of 7.1 CTPAs to detect one PE

Systematic screening versus clinical gestalt in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department

Background Diagnosing concomitant pulmonary embolism (PE) in COVID-19 patients remains challenging. As such, PE may be overlooked. We compared the diagnostic yield of systematic PE-screening based on the YEARS-algorithm to PE-screening based on clinical gestalt in emergency department (ED) patients with COVID-19. Methods We included all ED patients who were admitted because of COVID-19 between March 2020 and February 2021. Patients already receiving anticoagulant treatment were excluded. Up to April 7, 2020, the decision to perform CT-pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was based on physician’s clinical gestalt (clinical gestalt cohort). From April 7 onwards, systematic PE-screening was performed by CTPA if D-dimer level was ≥1000 ug/L, or ≥500 ug/L in case of ≥1 YEARS-item (systematic screening cohort). Results 1095 ED patients with COVID-19 were admitted. After applying exclusion criteria, 289 were included in the clinical gestalt and 574 in the systematic screening cohort. The number of PE diagnoses was significantly higher in the systematic screening cohort compared to the clinical gestalt cohort: 8.2% vs. 1.0% (3/289 vs. 47/574; p100 mg/L (OR 2.78, 95%CI 1.37–5.66, p = 0.005) were independently associated with PE. Conclusion In ED patients with COVID-19, the number of PE diagnosis was significantly higher in the cohort that underwent systematic PE screening based on the YEARS-algorithm in comparison with the clinical gestalt cohort, with a number needed to test of 7.1 CTPAs to detect one PE

Angiotensin-(1-7)-induced renal vasodilation is reduced in human kidneys with renal artery stenosis

Background: Angiotensin-(1-7) modulates renal blood flow in humans with essential hypertension by inducing vasodilation and counterbalancing angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction. Little is, however, known about the effects of angiotensin-(1-7) in kidneys with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. We previously demonstrated that the effect of angiotensin-(1-7) is reduced in patients with increased activity of the renin-angiotensin system. As the renin-angiotensin system is also activated in kidneys with renal artery stenosis, we hypothesized that the vasodilatory effect of angiotensin-(1-7) is also reduced in such kidneys. Method: Therefore, we selectively measured mean renal blood flow (133 Xenon washout method) before and during local infusion of angiotensin-(1-7) (0.27, 0.9, and 2.7 ng/kg per min) in hypertensive patients who were angiographically evaluated for the presence of renovascular abnormalities. Data were analyzed in three groups: stenotic kidneys, nonstenotic kidneys with renal artery stenosis of the contralateral kidney (contralateral stenotic kidneys), or essentially hypertensive controls without renovascular abnormalities (matched for urinary sodium excretion). Results: Angiotensin-(1-7) infusion resulted in an increase in renal blood flow in matched controls. In stenotic kidneys however, the effect of angiotensin-(1-7) was significantly reduced as compared to controls. The angiotensin-(1-7) effect in contralateral stenotic kidneys was comparable to controls. Conclusion: Angiotensin-(1-7)-induced vasodilation is reduced in stenotic kidneys, but not in contralateral stenotic kidneys. This suggests that the altered blood flow regulation in kidneys with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is a local phenomenon and not related to generalized atherosclerotic burden. Probably, the renin-angiotensin system activation, bioavailability of nitric oxide, and structural changes in the stenotic kidney play a role in this phenomenon

Reduced incidence of vein occlusion and postthrombotic syndrome after immediate compression for deep vein thrombosis

Contains fulltext : 198489.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Reduced incidence of vein occlusion and postthrombotic syndrome after immediate compression for deep vein thrombosis

Thus far, the association between residual vein occlusion and immediate compression therapy and postthrombotic syndrome is undetermined. Therefore, we investigated whether compression therapy immediately after diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis affects the occurrence of residual vein obstruction (RVO), and whether the presence of RVO is associated with postthrombotic syndrome and recurrent venous thromboembolism. In a prespecified substudy within the IDEAL (individualized duration of elastic compression therapy against long-term duration of therapy for prevention of postthrombotic syndrome) deep vein thrombosis (DVT) study, 592 adult patients from 10 academic and nonacademic centers across The Netherlands, with objectively confirmed proximal DVT of the leg, received no compression or acute compression within 24 hours of diagnosis of DVT with either multilayer bandaging or compression hosiery (pressure, 35 mm Hg). Presence of RVO and recurrent venous thromboembolism was confirmed with compression ultrasonography and incidence of postthrombotic syndrome as a Villalta score of at least 5 at 6 and 24 months. The average time from diagnosis until assessment of RVO was 5.3 (standard deviation, 1.9) months. A significantly lower percentage of patients who did receive compression therapy immediately after DVT had RVO (46.3% vs 66.7%; odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.80; P = .005). Postthrombotic syndrome was less prevalent in patients without RVO (46.0% vs 54.0%; odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.92; P = .013). Recurrent venous thrombosis showed no significant association with RVO. Immediate compression should therefore be offered to all patients with acute DVT of the leg, irrespective of severity of complaints. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01429714) and the Dutch Trial registry in November 2010 (NTR2597)

Individualised versus standard duration of elastic compression therapy for prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome (IDEAL DVT):A multicentre, randomised, single-blind, allocation-concealed, non-inferiority trial

Therapy with elastic compression stockings has been the cornerstone for prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome for decades in patients after acute deep venous thrombosis. It is uncertain who benefits most from therapy, and what the optimum duration of therapy should be. We therefore aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of individualised duration of compression therapy versus the standard duration of 24 months following an initial treatment period of 6 months. We did a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, allocation-concealed, non-inferiority trial at 12 hospitals in the Netherlands and two in Italy. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis of the leg and without pre-existent venous insufficiency (Clinical Etiological Anatomical and Pathophysiological score <C3) to receive either individualised duration of elastic compression therapy or standard duration of therapy for 24 months following an initial treatment period of 6 months. Randomisation was done with a web-based automatic randomisation programme (TENALEA) and a random block size (2-12), and was stratified by centre, age, and body-mass index. In the initial phase, compression was applied within 24 h of diagnosis according to three prespecified protocols. All patients received elastic compression stockings (30-40 mm Hg) for 6 months, and were instructed to wear them every day during ambulant hours. Thereafter treatment was tailored on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms scored according to the Villalta post-thrombotic syndrome scale; patients assigned to individualised therapy with two consecutive Villalta scores of 4 or less were instructed to stop using the stockings. Patients were followed up for 2 years and assessed at five clinic visits at study inclusion, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after diagnosis (stocking allocation was not revealed to the assessors). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with post-thrombotic syndrome at 24 months diagnosed according to original Villalta criteria (a score of ≥5 on two consecutive occasions at least 3 months apart) assessed by intention to treat. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the difference in success rates was set at 7·5%. This study has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01429714. Between March 22, 2011, and July 1, 2015, we enrolled 865 patients and randomly assigned 437 to individualised duration compression stockings and 428 to standard duration. 283 (66%) of 432 patients in the intervention group were advised before 24 months to stop wearing elastic compression stockings (236 [55%] of 432 patients after 6 months, and 47 [11%] of 432 at 12 months). Post-thrombotic syndrome occurred in 125 (29%) of 432 patients receiving individualised duration of therapy and in 118 (28%) of 424 receiving standard duration of therapy (odds ratio for difference 1·06, 95% CI 0·78 to 1·44). The absolute difference was 1·1% (95% CI -5·2 to 7·3), thus meeting the non-inferiority margin. 24 patients died, 17 (4%) in the individualised treatment group and seven (2%) in the standard duration group, but no deaths were related to treatment. No serious adverse events related to the intervention occurred. Individualised therapy with elastic compression stockings for the prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome was non-inferior to standard duration of therapy of 24 months. Individualising the duration is effective and could shorten the length of therapy needed, potentially enhancing patients' wellbeing. ZonMw (Netherlands