Trade-offs between feeding competition and predation risk in baboons

This study investigates the influence of feeding competition and predation risk on the behaviour and ecology of baboons. Four groups of chacma baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) were habituated and studied over 12 months between 1990-91 in the Pro-Namib desert region of Namibia. Each group differed in size and composition (with 1-6 adult males occupying groups of between 22-55 members), but their ranges overlapped extensively. Additional data were collected describing (1) food quality and availability and (2) biologically relevant measures of predation risk. The results suggest that contest competition for food or safety was minimal both within and between groups in this population. However, scramble competition for food did occur, despite high levels of food availability. Female reproductive state had little influence on feeding or anti-predator behaviour. Females and individuals in small groups were shown to be at the greatest risk of predation, and responded as predicted by exhibiting the highest levels of anti-predator behaviour. Habitat use reflected a trade-off between food availability and the reduction of both diurnal and nocturnal predation risk. Individual spatial position within groups was influenced by male reproductive strategies and predation risk, although social constraints might also have been present. Vigilance in males reflected reproductive strategies while in females vigilance was aimed at predator detection. Trade-offs between foraging and predation risk were suggested in the patterns of home range habitat composition, the use of habitat in the home range, the presence of scramble feeding competition, the choice of feeding site and the choice of diet. In addition, large groups reduced feeding competition at the expense of increased predation risk. Finally, points of special interest included the reduction of predation risk by both (1) the active use of "rest" time and (2) the defensive behaviour of male group members

When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making

Correct decision making is crucial for animals to maximize foraging success and minimize predation risk. Group-living animals can make such decisions by using their own personal information or by pooling information with other group members (i.e. social information). Here, we investigate how individuals might best balance their use of personal and social information. We use a simple modelling approach in which individual decisions based upon social information are more likely to be correct when more individuals are involved and their personal information is more accurate. Our model predicts that when the personal information of group members is poor (accurate less than half the time), individuals should avoid pooling information. In contrast, when personal information is reliable (accurate at least half the time), individuals should use personal information less often and social information more often, and this effect should grow stronger in larger groups. One implication of this pattern is that social information allows less well-informed members of large groups to reach a correct decision with the same probability as more well-informed members of small groups. Thus, animals in larger groups may be able to minimize the costs of collecting personal information without impairing their ability to make correct decisions

Social network inheritance and differentiation in wild baboons

Immatures' social development may be fundamental to understand important biological processes, such as social information transmission through groups, that can vary with age and sex. Our aim was to determine how social networks change with age and differ between sexes in wild immature baboons, group-living primates that readily learn socially. Our results show that immature baboons inherited their mothers' networks and differentiated from them as they aged, increasing their association with partners of similar age and the same sex. Males were less bonded to their matriline and became more peripheral with age compared to females. Our results may pave the way to further studies testing a new hypothetical framework: in female-philopatric societies, social information transmission may be constrained at the matrilineal level by age- and sex-driven social clustering

Personality predicts the propensity for social learning in a wild primate.

Copyright: 2014 Carter et al.Open Access Article. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 3.0Social learning can play a critical role in the reproduction and survival of social animals. Individual differences in the propensity for social learning are therefore likely to have important fitness consequences. We asked whether personality might underpin such individual variation in a wild population of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). We used two field experiments in which individuals had the opportunity to learn how to solve a task from an experienced conspecific demonstrator: exploitation of a novel food and a hidden item of known food. We investigated whether the (1) time spent watching a demonstrator and (2) changes in task-solving behaviour after watching a demonstrator were related to personality. We found that both boldness and anxiety influenced individual performance in social learning. Specifically, bolder and more anxious animals were more likely to show a greater improvement in task solving after watching a demonstrator. In addition, there was also evidence that the acquisition of social information was not always correlated with its use. These findings present new insights into the costs and benefits of different personality types, and have important implications for the evolution of social learning.Leakey FoundationAnimal Behavior Society (USA)International Primatological SocietyExplorers Club Exploration FundFenner School of Environment and SocietyNatural Environment Research Council (NERC

Personality predicts the propensity for social learning in a wild primate

Social learning can play a critical role in the reproduction and survival of social animals. Individual differences in the propensity for social learning are therefore likely to have important fitness consequences. We asked whether personality might underpin such individual variation in a wild population of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). We used two field experiments in which individuals had the opportunity to learn how to solve a task from an experienced conspecific demonstrator: exploitation of a novel food and a hidden item of known food. We investigated whether the (1) time spent watching a demonstrator and (2) changes in task-solving behaviour after watching a demonstrator were related to personality. We found that both boldness and anxiety influenced individual performance in social learning. Specifically, bolder and more anxious animals were more likely to show a greater improvement in task solving after watching a demonstrator. In addition, there was also evidence that the acquisition of social information was not always correlated with its use. These findings present new insights into the costs and benefits of different personality types, and have important implications for the evolution of social learning

Animal personality: What are behavioural ecologists measuring?

© 2012 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2012 Cambridge Philosophical SocietyThis is the peer reviewed version of the article available in final published form via DOI: 10.1111/brv.12007.The discovery that an individual may be constrained, and even behave sub-optimally, because of its personality type has fundamental implications for understanding individual- to group-level processes. Despite recent interest in the study of animal personalities within behavioural ecology, the field is fraught with conceptual and methodological difficulties inherent in any young discipline. We review the current agreement of definitions and methods used in personality studies across taxa and systems, and find that current methods risk misclassifying traits. Fortunately, these problems have been faced before by other similar fields during their infancy, affording important opportunities to learn from past mistakes. We review the tools that were developed to overcome similar methodological problems in psychology. These tools emphasise the importance of attempting to measure animal personality traits using multiple tests and the care that needs to be taken when interpreting correlations between personality traits or their tests. Accordingly, we suggest an integrative theoretical framework that incorporates these tools to facilitate a robust and unified approach in the study of animal personality. © 2012 Cambridge Philosophical Society.FennerSchool of Environment and SocietyResearch School of BiologyZoological Society of LondonNatural Environment Research Council (NERC

Phenotypic assortment in wild primate networks: implications for the dissemination of information.

Open Access article published under Creative Commons Attribution Licence.Final published version© The AuthorsElectronic supplementary material is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140444 or via http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org.This paper is a publication of the ZSL Institute of Zoology’s Tsaobis Baboon Project.Individuals' access to social information can depend on their social network. Homophily-a preference to associate with similar phenotypes-may cause assortment within social networks that could preclude information transfer from individuals who generate information to those who would benefit from acquiring it. Thus, understanding phenotypic assortment may lead to a greater understanding of the factors that could limit the transfer of information between individuals. We tested whether there was assortment in wild baboon (Papio ursinus) networks, using data collected from two troops over 6 years for six phenotypic traits-boldness, age, dominance rank, sex and the propensity to generate/exploit information-using two methods for defining a connection between individuals-time spent in proximity and grooming. Our analysis indicated that assortment was more common in grooming than proximity networks. In general, there was homophily for boldness, age, rank and the propensity to both generate and exploit information, but heterophily for sex. However, there was considerable variability both between troops and years. The patterns of homophily we observed for these phenotypes may impede information transfer between them. However, the inconsistency in the strength of assortment between troops and years suggests that the limitations to information flow may be quite variable.Churchill College, University of CambridgeNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)Leakey FoundationAnimal Behavior Society (USA)International Primatological SocietyExplorers Fun

A female signal reflects MHC genotype in a social primate.

BACKGROUND: Males from many species are believed to advertise their genetic quality through striking ornaments that attract mates. Yet the connections between signal expression, body condition and the genes associated with individual quality are rarely elucidated. This is particularly problematic for the signals of females in species with conventional sex roles, whose evolutionary significance has received little attention and is poorly understood. Here we explore these questions in the sexual swellings of female primates, which are among the most conspicuous of mammalian sexual signals and highly variable in size, shape and colour. We investigated the relationships between two components of sexual swellings (size and shape), body condition, and genes of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) in a wild baboon population (Papio ursinus) where males prefer large swellings. RESULTS: Although there was no effect of MHC diversity on the sexual swelling components, one specific MHC supertype (S1) was associated with poor body condition together with swellings of small size and a particular shape. The variation in swelling characteristics linked with the possession of supertype S1 appeared to be partially mediated by body condition and remained detectable when taking into account the possession of other supertypes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a pathway from immunity genes to sexual signals via physical condition for the first time in females. They further indicate that mechanisms of sexual selection traditionally assigned to males can also operate in females.RIGHTS : This article is licensed under the BioMed Central licence at http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/license which is similar to the 'Creative Commons Attribution Licence'. In brief you may : copy, distribute, and display the work; make derivative works; or make commercial use of the work - under the following conditions: the original author must be given credit; for any reuse or distribution, it must be made clear to others what the license terms of this work are

How do foragers decide when to leave a patch? A test of alternative models under natural and experimental conditions.

This is the peer reviewed version of the article which has been published in final form at DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12089. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.A forager's optimal patch-departure time can be predicted by the prescient marginal value theorem (pMVT), which assumes they have perfect knowledge of the environment, or by approaches such as Bayesian updating and learning rules, which avoid this assumption by allowing foragers to use recent experiences to inform their decisions. In understanding and predicting broader scale ecological patterns, individual-level mechanisms, such as patch-departure decisions, need to be fully elucidated. Unfortunately, there are few empirical studies that compare the performance of patch-departure models that assume perfect knowledge with those that do not, resulting in a limited understanding of how foragers decide when to leave a patch. We tested the patch-departure rules predicted by fixed rule, pMVT, Bayesian updating and learning models against one another, using patch residency times (PRTs) recorded from 54 chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) across two groups in natural (n = 6175 patch visits) and field experimental (n = 8569) conditions. We found greater support in the experiment for the model based on Bayesian updating rules, but greater support for the model based on the pMVT in natural foraging conditions. This suggests that foragers may place more importance on recent experiences in predictable environments, like our experiment, where these experiences provide more reliable information about future opportunities. Furthermore, the effect of a single recent foraging experience on PRTs was uniformly weak across both conditions. This suggests that foragers' perception of their environment may incorporate many previous experiences, thus approximating the perfect knowledge assumed by the pMVT. Foragers may, therefore, optimize their patch-departure decisions in line with the pMVT through the adoption of rules similar to those predicted by Bayesian updating.Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)Fenner School of Environment and SocietyLeakey FoundationAnimal Behavior Society (USA)International Primatological SocietyExplorers Club Exploration Fun