38 research outputs found
Housing situation and healthcare for patients in a psychiatric centre in Berlin, Germany: a cross-sectional patient survey
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the housing situation among people seeking psychiatric treatment in relation to morbidity and service utilisation.
DESIGN:
Cross-sectional patient survey.
SETTING:
Psychiatric centre with a defined catchment area in Berlin, Germany, March-September 2016.
PARTICIPANTS:
540 psychiatric inpatients including day clinics (43.2% of all admitted patients in the study period (n=1251)).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Housing status 30 days prior the interview as well as influencing variables including service use, psychiatric morbidity and sociodemographic variables.
RESULTS:
In our survey, 327 participants (68.7%) currently rented or owned an own apartment; 62 (13.0%) reported to be homeless (living on the street or in shelters for homeless or refugees); 87 (18.3%) were accommodated in sociotherapeutic facilities. Participants without an own apartment were more likely to be male and younger and to have a lower level of education. Homeless participants were diagnosed with a substance use disorder significantly more often (74.2%). Psychotic disorders were the highest among homeless participants (29.0%). Concerning service use, we did neither find a lower utilisation of ambulatory services nor a higher utilisation of hospital-based care among homeless participants.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings underline the need for effective housing for people with mental illness. Despite many sociotherapeutic facilities, a concerning number of people with mental illness is living in homelessness. Especially early interventions addressing substance use might prevent future homelessness
Bank Account Ownership and Access Among In-Patients in Psychiatric Care in Berlin, Germany-A Cross-Sectional Patient Survey
Background: Access to a bank account is critical for overall participation in social life and an indicator for social integration. Worldwide about 1.7 billion people remain with no access to banking facilities as a form of financial exclusion which represents 31% of the world's general population. In contrast, in Western countries like Germany, 99% of the general population use bank accounts.
Methods: We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional survey on bank account ownership and bank account access among psychiatric in-patients in a psychiatric hospital in Berlin. Out of 540 participants who were reached for an interview, 486 shared information about bank account ownership and 469 on access.
Results: Out of 486 participants 49 (10.1%) did not own a bank account. Among the remaining 420 participants owning a bank account, 36 (8.3%) did not have direct access to their bank account, but only, e.g., their legal guardian. Regression results found psychosis, intellectual disabilities, a longer treatment duration, as well as being of male gender and a more instable housing status to be significantly associated with a missing bank account or a missing access to one's bank account.
Conclusions: The lack of bank account ownership and access among this population of psychiatric patients is concerning. The interrelationship between factors of financial exclusion and mental health should be further explored in longitudinal studies. More attention is needed to support people with severe mental illness to be able to access resources associated with financial inclusion
Genome-wide association analyses of symptom severity among clozapine-treated patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders
Genome-wide association analyses of symptom severity among clozapine-treated patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders
Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, response is highly variable and possible genetic underpinnings of this variability remain unknown. Here, we performed polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses to estimate the amount of variance in symptom severity among clozapine-treated patients explained by PRSs (R2) and examined the association between symptom severity and genotype-predicted CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19 enzyme activity. Genome-wide association (GWA) analyses were performed to explore loci associated with symptom severity. A multicenter cohort of 804 patients (after quality control Nâ=â684) with schizophrenia spectrum disorder treated with clozapine were cross-sectionally assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and/or the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale. GWA and PRS regression analyses were conducted. Genotype-predicted CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19 enzyme activities were calculated. Schizophrenia-PRS was most significantly and positively associated with low symptom severity (pâ=â1.03âĂâ10â3; R2â=â1.85). Cross-disorder-PRS was also positively associated with lower CGI-S score (pâ=â0.01; R2â=â0.81). Compared to the lowest tertile, patients in the highest schizophrenia-PRS tertile had 1.94 times (pâ=â6.84Ă10â4) increased probability of low symptom severity. Higher genotype-predicted CYP2C19 enzyme activity was independently associated with lower symptom severity (pâ=â8.44Ă10â3). While no locus surpassed the genome-wide significance threshold, rs1923778 within NFIB showed a suggestive association (pâ=â3.78Ă10â7) with symptom severity. We show that high schizophrenia-PRS and genotype-predicted CYP2C19 enzyme activity are independently associated with lower symptom severity among individuals treated with clozapine. Our findings open avenues for future pharmacogenomic projects investigating the potential of PRS and genotype-predicted CYP-activity in schizophrenia