Goal Setting for Cognitive Rehabilitation in Mild to Moderate Parkinson’s Disease Dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies

This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.Alongside the physical symptoms associated with Parkinson’s disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies, health services must also address the cognitive impairments that accompany these conditions. There is growing interest in the use of nonpharmacological approaches to managing the consequences of cognitive disorder. Cognitive rehabilitation is a goal-orientated behavioural intervention which aims to enhance functional independence through the use of strategies specific to the individual’s needs and abilities. Fundamental to this therapy is a person’s capacity to set goals for rehabilitation. To date, no studies have assessed goal setting in early-stage Parkinson’s disease dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies. Semistructured interviews were carried out with 29 participants from an ongoing trial of cognitive rehabilitation for people with these conditions. Here, we examined the goal statements provided by these participants using qualitative content analysis, exploring the types and nature of the goals set. Participants’ goals reflected their motivations to learn new skills or improve performance in areas such as technology-use, selfmanagement and orientation, medication management, and social and leisure activities. These results suggest that goal setting is achievable for these participants, provide insight into the everyday cognitive difficulties that they experience, and highlight possible domains as targets for intervention. The trial is registered with ISRCTN16584442 (DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN16584442 13/04/2015)This work is supported by Health and Care Research Wales (formerly the National Institute for Health & Social Care Research) Grant no. RFPPB-2042-1020. The authors wish to thank Dr. Pam Martin-Forbes, Aaron Pritchard, Tori Garvey, Claire Watkins, and the staff based at BCUHB clinics for their ongoing assistance with participant screening and recruitment. The authors also thank Professor Kris Krippendorff for his advice regarding the interrater analysis and both Professor Krippendorff and Dr. Richard Craggs for use of their software program to perform this analysis

Impact of a Best Practice Alert on the Implementation of Expedited Partner Therapy

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine if an ED-based electronic health record (EHR) Best Practice Alert (BPA) increased the ordering of expedited partner therapy (EPT) for sexually transmitted infections (STI) in adult patients.Background: US EDs have reported increases in STI visits and positivity rates, mirroring record level increases in STI incidence in the general population. EPT is an evidence-based practice recommended by public health experts for treating sexual partners of STI patients. EDs typically evaluate patients for STIs without their sexual partner present, thereby providing opportunities for EPT. However, EPT is infrequently used in US EDs.Methods: This pilot study was part of a quality improvement initiative conducted between August and October 2021 in an academic tertiary care ED located in the Midwest. An EPT BPA was randomly displayed in the EHR to clinicians when they empirically treated adult ED patients for STIs with antibiotics. Differences in proportions of EPT ordering were calculated for STI visits between BPA exposed vs. unexposed, ED clinician type, and testing-confirmed vs. not confirmed STI status.Results: Of the 52 adult ED patients empirically treated for STIs during the study period, their mean age was 30 years old, 56% were female, 48% White and 40% Black, and 31% had Medicaid. Testing-confirmed STI prevalence was 27%. EPT was ordered less often during BPA unexposed (8%; 95% CI 1-25) than BPA exposed (42%; 95% CI 23-63) STI visits, for a mean difference of 35% (95% CI 13-56). EPT was ordered during 41% of STI visits involving residents, as compared to 7% of physician assistant visits (p=0.07). EPT was not ordered more often for testing-confirmed vs. not confirmed STI visits (21% vs. 26%; p=0.7).Conclusion: Displaying an EHR BPA greatly increased EPT ordering for patients empirically treated for STIs, although not consistently across all clinician types. Because suspected cases of STIs may be less common in some EDs depending on the populations they serve, BPAs may be a useful tool to bolster the implementation of EPT practices

Mixed-methods Evaluation of an Expedited Partner Therapy Take-home Medication Program: Pilot Emergency Department Intervention to Improve Sexual Health Equity

Background: Treatment for partners of patients diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections (STI), referred to as expedited partner therapy (EPT), is infrequently used in the emergency department (ED). This was a pilot program to initiate and evaluate EPT through medication-in-hand (“take-home”) kits or paper prescriptions. In this study we aimed to assess the frequency of EPT prescribing, the efficacy of a randomized best practice advisory (BPA) on the uptake, perceptions of emergency clinicians regarding the EPT pilot, and factors associated with EPT prescribing.Methods: We conducted this pilot study at an academic ED in the midwestern US between August–October 2021. The primary outcome of EPT prescription uptake and the BPA impact was measured via chart abstraction and analyzed through summary statistics and the Fisher exact test. We analyzed the secondary outcome of barriers and facilitators to program implementation through ED staff interviews (physicians, physician assistants, and nurses). We used a rapid qualitative assessment method for the analysis of the interviews.Results: During the study period, 52 ED patients were treated for chlamydia/gonorrhea, and EPT was offered to 25% (95% CI 15%–39%) of them. Expedited partner therapy was prescribed significantly more often (42% vs 8%; P < 0.01) when the interruptive pop-up alert BPA was shown compared to not shown. Barriers identified in the interviews included workflow constraints and knowledge of EPT availability. The BPA was viewed positively by the majority of participants.Conclusion: In this pilot EPT program, expedited partner therapy was provided to 25% of ED patients who appeared eligible to receive it. The interruptive pop-up alert BPA significantly increased EPT prescribing. Barriers identified to EPT prescribing should be the subject of future interventions to improve provision of EPT from the emergency department