LGG-06. Comprehensive genomic characterization and integrated clinical analysis of low-grade gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1

BACKGROUND: Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) arising in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are usually not biopsied. To identify secondary genetic alterations or molecular features that may contribute to pathogenesis and correlate with clinical behavior, we initiated a comprehensive molecular and clinical analysis of pediatric NF1-LGGs. METHODS: NF1-LGGs were analysed by whole-genome sequencing (31), targeted gene panel sequencing (9), RNAseq transcriptomal profiling (33) and genome-wide DNA methylation analysis (67). Clinical annotation was available for 48 subjects. RESULTS: Most LGGs harbored bi-allelic NF1 inactivation as the sole genetic abnormality, but 11% had additional alterations (FGFR1 mutation, n=3; PIK3CA mutation, n=2; homozygous 9p21 deletion, n=2; MYB:QKI fusion, n=1; SETD2 mutation, n=1; EGFR amplification, n=1). FGFR1 mutation conferred additional growth advantage in multiple complementary murine Nf1 models. 88% of NF1-LGGs resembled sporadic pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) by methylation, higher than that based on histology. Non-PA methylation patterns included low-grade glial/glioneuronal tumors, rosette-forming glioneuronal tumors, MYB/MYBL1-altered glioma, and high-grade astrocytoma with piloid features (2 tumors histologically diagnosed as LGG). In total, 18% of samples were classified as non-PA and/or harbored an additional non-NF1 mutation. Non-PA methylation class tumors were more likely to harbor an additional non-NF1 mutation (p=0.005). 7.7% of optic pathway hypothalamic gliomas (OPHGs) had other mutations or were not classified by methylation as PA, compared with 20.6% of NF1-LGGs arising elsewhere. There was no difference based on age for the presence of an additional non-NF1 mutation or non-PA methylation class. CONCLUSIONS: Given the overall low occurrence of non-NF1 mutations or non-PA methylation class tumors in this series, routine clinical biopsy of typically-appearing NF1-LGG may not be indicated, particularly for children with OPHG. Biopsy should be considered for non-OPHG tumors refractory to conventional treatment. As additional agents are developed and treatment strategies evolve, the rationale for biopsy of NF1-LGG may become stronger

Integrated molecular and clinical analysis of low-grade gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)

Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are the most common childhood brain tumor in the general population and in individuals with the Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) cancer predisposition syndrome. Surgical biopsy is rarely performed prior to treatment in the setting of NF1, resulting in a paucity of tumor genomic information. To define the molecular landscape of NF1-associated LGGs (NF1-LGG), we integrated clinical data, histological diagnoses, and multi-level genetic/genomic analyses on 70 individuals from 25 centers worldwide. Whereas, most tumors harbored bi-allelic NF1 inactivation as the only genetic abnormality, 11% had additional mutations. Moreover, tumors classified as non-pilocytic astrocytoma based on DNA methylation analysis were significantly more likely to harbor these additional mutations. The most common secondary alteration was FGFR1 mutation, which conferred an additional growth advantage in multiple complementary experimental murine Nf1 models. Taken together, this comprehensive characterization has important implications for the management of children with NF1-LGG, distinct from their sporadic counterparts

Prospective feasibility and safety assessment of surgical biopsy for patients with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

Background:Diagnosis of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) has relied on imaging studies, since the appearance is pathognomonic, and surgical risk was felt to be high and unlikely to affect therapy. The DIPG Biology and Treatment Study (DIPG-BATS) reported here incorporated a surgical biopsy at presentation and stratified subjects to receive FDA-approved agents chosen on the basis of specific biologic targets. Methods:Subjects were eligible for the trial if the clinical features and imaging appearance of a newly diagnosed tumor were consistent with a DIPG. Surgical biopsies were performed after enrollment and prior to definitive treatment. All subjects were treated with conventional external beam radiotherapy with bevacizumab, and then stratified to receive bevacizumab with erlotinib or temozolomide, both agents, or neither agent, based on O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status and epidermal growth factor receptor expression. Whole-genome sequencing and RNA sequencing were performed but not used for treatment assignment. Results:Fifty-three patients were enrolled at 23 institutions, and 50 underwent biopsy. The median age was 6.4 years, with 24 male and 29 female subjects. Surgical biopsies were performed with a specified technique and no deaths were attributed to the procedure. Two subjects experienced grade 3 toxicities during the procedure (apnea, n = 1; hypertension, n = 1). One subject experienced a neurologic deficit (left hemiparesis) that did not fully recover. Of the 50 tumors biopsied, 46 provided sufficient tissue to perform the study assays (92%, two-stage exact binomial 90% CI: 83%-97%). Conclusions:Surgical biopsy of DIPGs is technically feasible, associated with acceptable risks, and can provide biologic data that can inform treatment decisions