40 research outputs found
Acute systemic response to intraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene mesh/chitosan-based film composite in pigs
The role of prostaglandin E2 (PGE 2) in toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-mediated colitis-associated neoplasia
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We have previously found that TLR4-deficient (TLR4-/-) mice demonstrate decreased expression of mucosal PGE <sub>2 </sub>and are protected against colitis-associated neoplasia. However, it is still unclear whether PGE <sub>2 </sub>is the central factor downstream of TLR4 signaling that promotes intestinal tumorigenesis. To further elucidate critical downstream pathways involving TLR4-mediated intestinal tumorigenesis, we examined the effects of exogenously administered PGE <sub>2 </sub>in TLR4-/- mice to see if PGE <sub>2 </sub>bypasses the protection from colitis-associated tumorigenesis.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>Mouse colitis-associated neoplasia was induced by azoxymethane (AOM) injection followed by two cycles of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) treatment. Two different doses of PGE <sub>2 </sub>(high dose group, 200 μg, n = 8; and low dose group, 100 μg, n = 6) were administered daily during recovery period of colitis by gavage feeding. Another group was given PGE <sub>2 </sub>during DSS treatment (200 μg, n = 5). Inflammation and dysplasia were assessed histologically. Mucosal Cox-2 and amphiregulin (AR) expression, prostanoid synthesis, and EGFR activation were analyzed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In control mice treated with PBS, the average number of tumors was greater in WT mice (n = 13) than in TLR4-/- mice (n = 7). High dose but not low dose PGE <sub>2 </sub>treatment caused an increase in epithelial proliferation. 28.6% of PBS-treated TLR4-/- mice developed dysplasia (tumors/animal: 0.4 ± 0.2). By contrast, 75.0% (tumors/animal: 1.5 ± 1.2, P < 0.05) of the high dose group and 33.3% (tumors/animal: 0.3 ± 0.5) of the low dose group developed dysplasia in TLR4-/- mice. Tumor size was also increased by high dose PGE <sub>2 </sub>treatment. Endogenous prostanoid synthesis was differentially affected by PGE <sub>2 </sub>treatment during acute and recovery phases of colitis. Exogenous administration of PGE <sub>2 </sub>increased colitis-associated tumorigenesis but this only occurred during the recovery phase. Lastly, PGE <sub>2 </sub>treatment increased mucosal expression of AR and Cox-2, thus inducing EGFR activation and forming a positive feedback mechanism to amplify mucosal Cox-2.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These results highlight the importance of PGE <sub>2 </sub>as a central downstream molecule involving TLR4-mediated intestinal tumorigenesis.</p
Prostaglandin E1 maintains structural integrity of intestinal mucosa and prevents bacterial translocation during experimental obstructive jaundice.
Primary surgery in patients with de novo stage IV BC; finalizing the protocol MF07-01 randomized clinical trial
Background. The MF07-01 trial is a multicenter randomized study comparing locoregional treatment (LRT) followed by systemic therapy (ST) with ST alone in de novo Stage IV breast cancer (BC) patients.
Aim: To evaluate and finalize the survival data of LRT in patients with the diagnosis of de novo Stage IV BC.
Methods. At initial diagnosis, patients were randomized 1:1 to either the LRT or ST group. All the patients were given ST either immediately after randomization or after surgical resection of the intact primary tumor. Continuous and categorical variable differences between LRT and ST groups were analyzed using t-test and Chi-square test, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and 5-year survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios, and logistic regession model used to estimate odds ratio.
Results. During more than 10 years follow-up, 23% of patients in LRT group and 8% of patients in ST group were alive. Median survival was 46 months for LRT (n=134) and 35 months for ST (n=131) [HR:0.71, 95%CI;0.59-0.86, p=0.0004]. Solitary bone metastasis patients’ median survival was 14 months longer in LRT group comparing ST group [HR:0.55, 95%CI; 0.35-0.86, p=0.008]; 16% of solitary bone metastasis patients in the LRT group were alive, but all patients died in the ST group. Patients younger than 55 lived longer compared the patients older than 55 [HR:0.67, 95%CI; 0.52-0.87, p=0.002], and 26% of hormone receptor positive patients were still alive in the LRT group comparing 10% in the ST group [HR:0.71, 95%CI; 0.58-0.88, p=0.002]. Regarding the patients who lived at least 5 years since randomization, LRT (p=0.003), hormone receptor positivity (p=0.004), Triple negative status (p=0.02), hormonotherapy (p=0.0001), bisphosphonates usage (p=0.03), and 2 or more organ metastases (p=0.004) were associated with OS in univariant analyses. However, in the multivariate model with significant baseline and clinical characteristics only LRT [OR= 1.58, p=0.03] was found to be significantly related with over 5 years of survival.
Conclusion. In the current analysis, patients at the diagnosis of de novo stage IV BC who underwent LRT followed by ST had a 58% higher chance to live at least 5 years compared to the patients who received only ST. Longer follow-up of the study discloses that LRT should be presented to patients when discussing treatment options