Imipenem resistance of Pseudomonas in pneumonia: a systematic literature review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pneumonia, and particularly nosocomial (NP) and ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAP), results in high morbidity and costs. NPs in particular are likely to be caused by <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa </it>(PA), ~20% of which in observational studies are resistant to imipenem. We sought to identify the burden of PA imipenem resistance in pneumonia.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of imipenem treatment for pneumonia published in English between 1993 and 2008. We extracted study, population and treatment characteristics, and proportions caused by PA. Endpoints of interest were: PA resistance to initial antimicrobial treatment, clinical success, microbiologic eradication and on-treatment emergence of resistance of PA.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of the 46 studies identified, 20 (N = 4,310) included patients with pneumonia (imipenem 1,667, PA 251; comparator 1,661, PA 270). Seven were double blind, and 7 included US data. Comparator arms included a β-lactam (17, [penicillin 6, carbapenem 4, cephalosporin 7, monobactam 1]), aminoglycoside 2, vancomycin 1, and a fluoroquinolone 5; 5 employed double coverage. Thirteen focused exclusively on pneumonia and 7 included pneumonia and other diagnoses. Initial resistance was present in 14.6% (range 4.2-24.0%) of PA isolates in imipenem and 2.5% (range 0.0-7.4%) in comparator groups. Pooled clinical success rates for PA were 45.2% (range 0.0-72.0%) for imipenem and 74.9% (range 0.0-100.0%) for comparator regimens. Microbiologic eradication was achieved in 47.6% (range 0.0%-100.0%) of isolates in the imipenem and 52.8% (range 0.0%-100.0%) in the comparator groups. Resistance emerged in 38.7% (range 5.6-77.8%) PA isolates in imipenem and 21.9% (range 4.8-56.5%) in comparator groups.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In the 15 years of RCTs of imipenem for pneumonia, PA imipenem resistance rates are high, and PA clinical success and microbiologic eradication rates are directionally lower for imipenem than for comparators. Conversely, initial and treatment-emergent resistance is more likely with the imipenem than the comparator regimens.</p

Increased renal production of C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) in patients with cirrhosis and functional renal failure

BACKGROUND/AIMS—C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), the third member of the natriuretic peptide family, is considered to be involved in the regulation of vascular tone. Furthermore, the recent demonstration of CNP in human kidney and urine may indicate a role for CNP in fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the possible role of CNP in renal function disturbances in patients with cirrhosis of the liver.
METHODS—Peripheral venous and urinary concentrations of CNP were determined in samples from 11 healthy controls, 20 cirrhotic patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance 117 (8) ml/min), and 20 cirrhotic patients with impaired renal function (creatinine clearance 35 (4) ml/min). In a second protocol, arterial and renal venous plasma concentrations of CNP were determined in 37 patients with cirrhosis of the liver to estimate renal extraction ratios of CNP. A sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay was applied after solid phase extraction of samples.
RESULTS—Plasma CNP was lower in cirrhotic patients with normal and impaired renal function than in controls (3.0 (0.4) and 2.7 (0.2) v 4.2 (0.4) pg/ml, respectively; p< 0.05; mean (SEM)). In contrast, urinary CNP was higher in patients with impaired renal function compared with those with normal renal function and healthy controls (47.2 (7.4) v 20.8 (1.9) and 17.0 (3.0) ng CNP/g creatinine, respectively; p<0.05). Urinary CNP was found to be inversely related to urinary sodium excretion in cirrhotic patients (r=−0.56; p<0.01). No differences were observed between arterial and renal venous concentrations of CNP in cirrhosis (2.4 (0.2) v 2.4 (0.2) pg/ml). In cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome or refractory ascites (n=5), urinary CNP decreased from 132 (59) to 38 (7) ng/g creatinine (p<0.05) one week after either ornipressin infusion or insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt together with an increase in urinary sodium excretion from 27 (17) to 90 (34) mmol/24 hours.
CONCLUSIONS—Increased urinary CNP in cirrhotic patients in the absence of renal arteriovenous concentration gradients suggests enhanced renal CNP production in cirrhosis. Furthermore, an inverse relation between urinary CNP and urinary sodium excretion suggests a role for this peptide in renal sodium handling in patients with cirrhosis.


Keywords: C-type natriuretic peptide; renal function; natriuresis; cirrhosi