Mannitol-facilitated CNS entry of rAAV2 vector significantly delayed the neurological disease progression in MPS IIIB mice

The presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) presents the most critical challenge in therapeutic development for mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) IIIB, a lysosomal storage disease with severe neurological manifestation, because of alpha-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NaGlu) deficiency. Earlier, we showed a global central nervous system (CNS) transduction in mice by mannitol-facilitated entry of intravenous (IV)-delivered recombinant adeno-associated viral serotype 2 (rAAV2) vector. In this study, we optimized the approach and showed that the maximal transduction in the CNS occurred when the rAAV2 vector was IV injected at 8 min after mannitol administration, and was approximately 10-fold more efficient than IV delivery of the vector at 5 or 10 min after mannitol infusion. Using this optimal (8 min) regimen, a single IV infusion of rAAV2-CMV-hNaGlu vector is therapeutically beneficial for treating the CNS disease of MPS IIIB in adult mice, with significantly extended survival, improved behavioral performance, and reduction of brain lysosomal storage pathology. The therapeutic benefit correlated with maximal delivery to the CNS, but not peripheral tissues. This milestone data shows the first effective gene delivery across the BBB to treat CNS disease. The critical timing of vector delivery and mannitol infusion highlights the important contribution of this pretreatment to successful intervention, and the long history of safe use of mannitol in patients bodes well for its application in CNS gene therapy

Stakeholder Engagement in HIV Cure Research: Lessons Learned from Other HIV Interventions and the Way Forward

Clinical and basic science advances have raised considerable hope for achieving an HIV cure by accelerating research. This research is dominated primarily by issues about the nature and design of current and future clinical trials. Stakeholder engagement for HIV cure remains in its early stages. Our analysis examines timing and mechanisms of historical stakeholder engagement in other HIV research areas for HIV-uninfected individuals [vaccine development and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)], and HIV-infected individuals (treatment as prevention, prevention of mother-to-child transmission, and treatment of acute HIV infection) and articulate a plan for HIV cure stakeholder engagement. The experience from HIV vaccine development shows that early engagement of stakeholders helped manage expectations, mitigating the failure of several vaccine trials, while paving the way for subsequent trials. The relatively late engagement of HIV stakeholders in PrEP research may partly explain some of the implementation challenges. The treatment-related stakeholder engagement was strong and community-led from the onset and helped translation from research to implementation. We outline five steps to initiate and sustain stakeholder engagement in HIV cure research and conclude that stakeholder engagement represents a key investment in which stakeholders mutually agree to share knowledge, benefits, and risk of failure. Effective stakeholder engagement prevents misconceptions. As HIV cure research advances from early trials involving subjects with generally favorable prognosis to studies involving greater risk and uncertainty, success may depend on early and deliberate engagement of stakeholders