Papel da Cirurgia Bucomaxilofacial na Reabilitação de Pacientes com Câncer de Cabeça e Pescoço

The aim of this article is to investigate and elucidate the impact and relevance of oral and maxillofacial surgery in the rehabilitation process of individuals facing the challenge of head and neck cancer. The indexes SciVerse Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo), U.S. National Library of Medicine (PUBMED) and ScienceDirect were used as search engines. The articles were contemplated between the years 2000 to 2023. The rehabilitation approach in oral and maxillofacial surgery for patients facing head and neck cancer represents a crucial pillar in the journey of treatment and recovery. The complexity of the functional, aesthetic and psychosocial implications of this type of cancer requires a multidisciplinary and integrated approach that goes beyond the medical aspect. The results demonstrate that this rehabilitation technique can effectively improve the quality of life of patients, allowing restoration of function, recovery of self-image and social reintegration. Collaboration between oral and maxillofacial surgeons, physical therapists, speech therapists and mental health professionals plays a vital role in this process, providing a holistic and comprehensive approach.O objetivo deste artigo é investigar e elucidar o impacto e a relevância da cirurgia bucomaxilofacial no processo de reabilitação de indivíduos que enfrentam o desafio do câncer de cabeça e pescoço. Foram utilizados como motores de busca os indexadores SciVerse Scopus, Scientific Eletronic Library Online (Scielo), U.S. National Library of Medicine (PUBMED) e ScienceDirect. Os artigos foram contemplados entre os anos de 2000 a 2023. A abordagem de reabilitação na cirurgia bucomaxilofacial para pacientes que enfrentam câncer de cabeça e pescoço representa um pilar crucial na jornada de tratamento e recuperação. A complexidade das implicações funcionais, estéticas e psicossociais desse tipo de câncer exige uma abordagem multidisciplinar e integrada que vá além do aspecto médico. Os resultados demonstram que essa técnica de reabilitação pode efetivamente melhorar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes, permitindo a restauração da função, a recuperação da autoimagem e a reintegração social. A colaboração entre cirurgiões bucomaxilofaciais, fisioterapeutas, fonoaudiólogos e profissionais de saúde mental desempenha um papel vital nesse processo, fornecendo uma abordagem holística e abrangente

Monitoramento pós-mercado dos testes rápidos para COVID-19: enfrentamento da pandemia:

Introduction: In December 2019, the  first group of patients with symptoms of atypical pneumonia was discovered in Wuhan, China. On January 7, 2020, the etiologic agent was identified; it was a new betacoronavirus, genetically similar to SARS-CoV-1, consisting of a simple RNA strand, an enveloped virus of 50-200nm in diameter, which was called SARS-CoV-2. Soon after, the disease was named COVID-19. On January 30, WHO declared a Public Health Emergency of International Importance due to the spread of the coronavirus. Tests for serological detection of IgM and IgG antibodies are those that provide an estimate of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2, highlighting the Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT), simple and accessible with a result within 5-30 minutes, based on sensitization of antigens/antibodies conjugated to colloidal gold capturing specific proteins present in the infected serum, plasma or blood. Objective: This work aims to show the analysis carried out with RDT for COVID-19 diagnosis in compliance with the current legislation from 02.04 to 18.08.2020. Method: In March of 2020, 25 serum/plasma samples were donated, without any identification. These samples were the remaining samples of tests performed on individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection by the RT-PCR technique from health services (National Institute of Infectious Diseases Evandro Chagas – INI and State Institute of the Brain Paulo Niemeyer – IEC) located in the metropolitan region of the state of Rio de Janeiro. The samples obtained in order to become a serological panel were stored at -20ºC until the moment of use. Simultaneously, a panel of samples with confirmed reactivity for IgM and IgG antibodies from COVID-19 was being made, throughout the pandemic and the samples used were evaluated against three Rapid Tests, of different antigenic compositions or different brands; two ELISA tests for IgM and IgG; two chemiluminescence tests and when applicable, a molecular test. In order to assess the specificity of the products sent, surplus donation plasma samples were selected, known to be negative for HIV, HTLV, hepatitis b and c, chagas and syphilis, collected between 2013 and 2014, in the southern regions of the country, period in which SARS-CoV-2 was nonexistent in the world. In addition to True Positive (VP) and True Negative (VN) samples, interfering serum or plasma samples with reactivity for HIV, HCV, HTLV, HBsAg, chagas disease, syphilis and dengue were also included in the evaluation. Results:  Out of 178 TR lots, 74.1%, 132 lots were from China and 25.9%, 46 TR lots were from Brazil; Germany; South Korea; Canada; USA; Singapore; Ireland and Switzerland. The analytical result showed that 57.0%, 101 TR lots obtained a Satisfactory result and 43%, 77 lots had Unsatisfactory results, when compared to the Sensitivity and Specificity values declared by the manufacturer, in the Instructions for Use. Conclusions:The results obtained show the need for constant monitoring of TRs for COVID-19 with the primary purpose of guaranteeing the quality of products sold in the country, one of the National Health Surveillance System pillars of action.  Introdução: Em dezembro de 2019, foi descoberto na cidade de Wuhan, China, um primeiro grupo de pacientes com sintomas de uma pneumonia atípica. Em 7 de janeiro de 2020, o seu agente etiológico foi identificado: tratava-se de um novo betacoronavírus, geneticamente similar ao SARS-CoV-1, constituído defita simples de RNA, vírus envelopado de 50-200 nm de diâmetro designado como SARS-CoV-2, e a doença foi denominada COVID-19. Em 30 de janeiro, a Organização Mundial da Saúde declarou Emergência de Saúde Pública de Importância Internacional em razão da disseminação desse novo vírus. Os testes para detecção sorológica de anticorpos IgM e IgG fornecem uma estimativa da resposta imune ao SARS-CoV-2, com destaque para os Testes Rápidos (TR) que são simples e acessíveis fornecendo resultados em 5-30 min. Esses testes são sensibilizados com antígenos/anticorpos conjugados ao ouro coloidal, capturando proteínas específicas presentes no soro, plasma ou sangue de pacientes infectados. Objetivo: Demonstrar a análise efetuada nos TR para diagnóstico da COVID-19, em atendimento a legislação vigente, no período de 2 de abril a 18 de agosto de 2020. Método: Durante o mês de março de 2020, foram cedidas 25 amostras de soro/plasma, sem qualquer identificação, excedentes dos testes efetuados em indivíduos com diagnóstico confirmado de infecção pelo SARS-CoV-2 pela técnica de RT-PCR provenientes de serviços de saúde (InstitutoNacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas – INI e Instituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer – IEC) localizados na região metropolitana do estado do Rio de Janeiro. As amostras obtidas para a confecção de painel sorológico foram armazenadas a -20ºC até o momento do uso. Concomitantemente, um painel de amostras com reatividade confirmada para anticorpos IgM e IgG da COVID-19 foi sendo confeccionado ao longo da pandemia e as amostras utilizadas foram avaliadas frente a três TR, de diferentes composições antigênicas ou diferentes marcas; dois testes ELISA para IgM e IgG; dois testes de quimioluminescência e quando aplicável, um teste molecular. Para avaliação da especificidade dos produtos encaminhados, foram selecionadas amostras de plasma excedentes de doação, sabidamente negativas para HIV, HTLV, hepatite B e C, doença de chagas e sífilis coletadas nos anos de 2013 e 2014, na Região Sul do país, período no qual o SARS-CoV-2 era inexistente. Além de amostras Verdadeiro Positivas (VP) e Verdadeiro Negativas (VN), ainda foram incluídas na avaliação amostras de soro ou plasma interferentes com reatividade para HIV, HCV, HTLV, HBsAg, doença de chagas, sífilis e dengue. Resultados:  Dos 178 lotes de TR, 74,1% foram provenientes da China e 25,9%, do Brasil, da Alemanha, da Coreia do Sul, do Canadá, dos EUA, da Cingapura,da Irlanda e da Suíça. O resultado analítico demonstrou que 57,0% dos TR obtiveram resultados satisfatórios e 43,0%, resultados insatisfatórios, quando comparados aos valores de sensibilidade e especificidade declarados pelo fabricante na instrução de uso. Conclusões: Há necessidade de constante monitoramento dos TR para COVID-19, com finalidade precípua de garantir a qualidade dos produtos comercializados no país, um dos pilares das ações do Sistema Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária

Estimulação cerebral profunda na Doença de Parkinson: evidências de estudos de longa duração

A Doença de Parkinson (DP) é uma condição neurodegenerativa crônica que afeta principalmente idosos, mas pode ocorrer em adultos jovens. É a segunda doença neurodegenerativa mais comum, após o Alzheimer. A DP afeta 1% dos indivíduos acima de 60 anos em países industrializados. Sua causa envolve fatores genéticos e ambientais, como exposição a pesticidas e envelhecimento. A Estimulação Cerebral Profunda (DBS) é um tratamento que simula lesões cerebrais, melhorando sintomas motores e não motores. O presente estudo tem como objetivo analisar evidências de estudos sobre a eficácia da DBS no tratamento da DP. Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática de estudos quantitativos que utiliza as bases de dados PubMed (Medline), Cochrane Library e Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) para selecionar artigos científicos. Os estudos incluídos abrangem o período de 2013 a 2023 e estão em inglês, abordando a DBS no tratamento da DP. A DBS melhora diversos sintomas motores e não motores, resultando em uma melhor qualidade de vida para os pacientes. Tais benefícios são sustentados mesmo em estágios avançados da Doença de Parkinson, a qual consiste em fornecer pulsos de corrente elétrica a áreas cerebrais profundas através de eletrodos implantados cirurgicamente, geralmente quando a terapia medicamentosa já não é eficaz. Em um estudo com 82 pacientes, a terapia com DBS resultou em uma redução de ± 52% nos sintomas motores do UPDRS sob medicação antes da cirurgia. A melhora nos sintomas motores com a estimulação, em comparação com a ausência de estimulação e medicação, foi de ± 61% no primeiro ano e ± 39% de 8 a 15 anos após a cirurgia (antes da reprogramação). A medicação foi reduzida em ± 55% após 1 ano e ± 44% após 8 a 15 anos, com a maioria dos pacientes mostrando melhorias após a reprogramação. De acordo com as literaturas analisadas, a DBS é uma terapia eficaz para a DP. Enfatiza-se a importância da inovação contínua e dos novos estudos para explorar as facetas não investigadas desse campo. Com a abordagem dos aspectos clínicos, cirúrgicos, tecnológicos e científicos, destacam-se os benefícios, limitações e desafios a serem superados. Ademais, inovações tecnológicas na DBS, como a estimulação direcional, adaptativa e a telemedicina estão sendo exploradas. Em suma, este artigo fornece evidências sobre os benefícios da DBS na DP, ressaltando a necessidade de pesquisas adicionais para otimizar tal intervenção terapêutica e melhorar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes

Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit

Effects of hospital facilities on patient outcomes after cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational study

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 licenseBackground: Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. Methods: A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Interpretation: Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research