Mycophenolate Mofetil in Pancreas Transplantation

Background: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been shown to decrease the incidence of acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation. The use of MMF along with tacrolimus for \u3e or =1 year after pancreas transplantation has not been studied in a large single-center analysis. Methods: Between July 1, 1995 and June 30, 1997, both MMF and tacrolimus were given to 120 pancreas transplant recipients. By category, 61 underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK); 44 underwent pancreas transplantation after previous kidney transplantation (PAK); and 15 underwent pancreas transplantation alone (PTA). By donor source, 86% of the grafts were from a cadaver, and 14% were from a living-related donor. Induction therapy was with MMF, tacrolimus, prednisone, and antithymocyte globulin (n=109) or OKT3 (n=2). Until oral intake was resumed, recipients initially received intravenous azathioprine. Side effects were as follows: gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in 53% of recipients receiving combined MMF and tacrolimus therapy; bone marrow toxicity in 24% of recipients receiving MMF alone; nephrotoxicity in 18% and neurotoxicity in 11% of recipients receiving tacrolimus alone. We did a matched-pair analysis to compare outcome in MMF versus azathioprine recipients, using the database of the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. Matching criteria included transplantation category, transplantation number, recipient and donor age, duct management, HLA typing, and transplantation year. Results: One-year patient survival rates were 98% for SPK, 98% for PAK, and 100% for PTA (P=NS). For SPK recipients, 1-year pancreas graft survival rates were 86% with MMF versus 79% with azathioprine (P=NS); kidney graft survival rates were 96% with MMF versus 86% with azathioprine (P=NS). The incidence of first rejection episodes at 1 year was significantly lower for MMF recipients (15% with MMF versus 43% with azathioprine) (P = 0.0003). For recipients of solitary pancreas transplants (PTA and PAK), we found no difference in graft survival rates between MMF and azathioprine. The conversion rate from MMF to azathioprine at 1 year was 14% for SPK recipients, 26% for PAK, and 39% for PTA (P \u3c 0.007). The most common reason for conversion was GI toxicity, in particular for nonuremic (PTA) or posturemic (PAK) recipients. The rates of posttransplant infection and lymphoproliferative disease were low for recipients on MMF and tacrolimus. Conclusions: The combination of MMF and tacrolimus after pancreas transplantation is highly effective and safe. For SPK recipients, the incidence of acute reversible rejection episodes was significantly lower with MMF than with azathioprine. The conversion rate from MMF to azathioprine because of GI toxicity was lowest for SPK and highest for PTA recipients

Renal Pedicle Torsion after Simultaneous Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation

Background: Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation has become a recognized therapy for type I diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy. In the vast majority of these procedures, both grafts are placed intraperitoneally, which reduces posttransplant morbidity. Recently, in some of our recipients, we noted renal dysfunction related to complications of the renal pedicle. Our objectives in this study were to identify the cause of this renal dysfunction and to prevent its occurrence in future recipients. Study Design: We undertook a retrospective chart review of simultaneous kidney-pancreas recipients who experienced renal dysfunction related to renal pedicle complications. Results: We found four recipients with renal dysfunction related to renal pedicle torsion, diagnosed by serial ultrasound scans and kidney graft biopsies. Early diagnosis allowed salvage of three kidney grafts, but one was lost after late diagnosis. Conclusions: A high level of suspicion is needed to diagnose renal pedicle torsion. If simultaneous kidney-pancreas recipients have recurrent renal dysfunction, and rejection has been excluded, serial ultrasound scans with color flow Doppler examinations are needed. Once the diagnosis is made, a nephropexy to the anterior abdominal wall is indicated to prevent further torsion and save the kidney graft. We recommend prophylactic nephropexy of left renal grafts if the renal pedicle is ≥5 cm long and if there is a 2 cm or more discrepancy between the length of the artery and the vein

Long-Term Quality of Life after Kidney and Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

We are using a validated questionnaire (SF-36) to annually assess health-related quality of life (QOL) in kidney and pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. The SF-36 consists of eight scales to assess physical functioning, general health, and mental functioning. Norms and 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) have been developed for the US population. At present, 1138 recipients with functioning grafts (520 Type I diabetic; 618 nondiabetic) 1-10 yr post-transplant have completed the questionnaire. Of the recipients, 446 completed the questionnaire once; 632 twice; and 53 three times (305 after 1 yr; 266 after 2 yr; 256 after 3 yr; 206 after 4 yr; 192 after 5 yr; 150 after 6 yr; 130 after 7 yr; 138 after 8 yr; 125 after 9 yr; 92 after 10 yr). For both diabetic and nondiabetic recipients, there was little change in average scores for each scale between years (p = NS). In relation to the US population, average scores for nondiabetics were below the 50th percentile on all 8 scales; for diabetics \u3c 25th percentile on the physical functioning and vitality scales, \u3c 50th percentile on all others. For both diabetic and nondiabetic recipients, average scores were higher than reported norms for patients with CHF, COPD, or depression but were similar to those with Htn or recent MI. Individual scores were then compared with age-matched means (+/- 2 SEMs) (95% C.I.) for the US population. At each year post-transplant, up to 40% of nondiabetic and up to 65% of diabetic recipients had scores below the 95% C.I. on individual scales (particularly the physical functioning and general health scales)--e.g. over 30% nondiabetic and up to 60% diabetic recipients had scores on the physical functioning scales below the 95% C.I. More diabetic recipients (vs. nondiabetics) reported poor QOL on the physical functioning, general health and social functioning scales. There was little difference in the mental health scales. For those with Type I diabetes, a similar percentage of kidney and K/P recipients reported QOL below the 95% C.I. for the age-matched population, except on the GH scale (better QOL for K/P recipients). We conclude that successful transplant recipients report health-related QOL below that of the age-matched general population but similar to those with other chronic diseases. Diabetic and nondiabetic recipients have similar scores on the mental health scales; nondiabetic recipients score better on the general health and physical functioning scales