Geometry effects on STOL engine-over-the-wing acoustics with 5.1 slot nozzles

The correspondence of far field acoustic trends with changes in the characteristics of the flow field at the wing trailing edge caused by alterations in the nozzle-wing geometry were determined for several STOL-OTW configurations. Nozzle roof angles of 10 to 40 deg were tested with and without cutback of the nozzle sidewalls. Three wing chord sizes were used: baseline (33 cm with flaps retracted), 2/3-baseline, and 3/2-baseline. Flap deflection angles of 20 and 60 deg were used. The nozzle locations were at 21 and 46-percent of chord. With increasing wing size the jet noise shielding benefits increased. With increasing nozzle roof angle, the jet velocity at the trailing edge was decreased, causing a decrease in trailing-edge and fluctuating lift noise. Cutback of the nozzle sides improved flow attachment and reduced far-field noise. The best flow attachment and least trailing-edge noise generally were obtained with a 40 deg external deflector configuration and a cutback nozzle with a 40 deg roof angle

Wing aerodynamic loading caused by jet-induced lift associated with STOL-OTW configurations

Surface pressure distributions were obtained with model-scale STOL-OTW configurations using various nozzles designed to promote flow attachment to the wing/flap surface. The nozzle configurations included slot-types and both circular and slot nozzles with external flow deflectors. The wing aerodynamic loading caused by the jet-induced lift is presented in conventional terms of delta p/q as a function of chordwise surface distance in the nozzle centerline plane as well as outboard of the nozzle centerline. Nozzle roof/deflector angle, chordwise location of the nozzle, wing size, and flap deflection angle are included in the geometric variables affecting the wing loading

Nozzle and wing geometry effects on OTW aerodynamic characteristics

The effects of nozzle geometry and wing size on the aerodynamic performance of several 5:1 aspect ratio slot nozzles are presented for over-the-wing (OTW) configurations. Nozzle geometry variables include roof angle, sidewall cutback, and nozzle chordwise location. Wing variables include chord size, and flap deflection. Several external deflectors also were included for comparison. The data indicate that good flow turning may not necessarily provide the best aerodynamic performance. The results suggest that a variable exhaust nozzle geometry offers the best solution for a viable OTW configuration

Comparison of predicted engine core noise with proposed FAA helicopter noise certification requirements

Calculated engine core noise levels, based on NASA-Lewis prediction procedures, for five representative helicopter engines are compared with measured total helicopter noise levels and proposed FAA helicopter noise certification requirements. Comparisons are made for level flyover and approach procedures. The measured noise levels are generally significantly greater than those predicted for the core noise levels, except for Sikorsky S-61 and S-64 helicopters. However, the predicted engine core noise levels are generally at or within 3 db of the proposed FAA noise rules. Consequently, helicopter engine core noise can be a significant contributor to the overall helicopter noise signature and, at this time, will provide a limiting floor to a further decrease in future noise regulations

Noise of deflectors used for flow attachment with STOL-OTW configurations

Future STOL aircraft may utilize engine-over-the-wing installations in which the exhaust nozzles are located above and separated from the upper surface of the wing. An external jet flow deflector can be used with such installations to provide flow attachment to the wing/flap surfaces for lift augmentation. Deflector noise in the flyover plane measured with several model-scale nozzle/deflector/wing configurations is examined. The deflector-associated noise is correlated in terms of velocity and geometry parameters. The data also indicate that the effective overall sound pressure level of the deflector-associated noise peaks in the forward quadrant near 40 deg from the inlet axis

Influence of mixer nozzle velocity decay characteristics on CTOL-OTW jet noise shielding

Jet noise shielding benefits for CTOL engine-over-the-wing configurations were obtained with model scale multitube and lobed mixer nozzles and various shielding surface geometries. Spectral data were obtained with jet velocities from 585 to 1110 ft/sec. Correlation equations for predicting jet noise shielding benefits with single conical nozzle installations were modified to correlate the mixer nozzle data. The modification included consideration of the number of nozzle elements and the peak axial velocity decay in the flow field adjacent to the shielding surface. The effect of forward velocity on jet noise attenuation by a shielding surface is discussed

JT150 1/2-scale nozzle jet noise experiment and comparison with prediction

As part of a program to study flight effects on the exhaust noise of a full scale JT15D engine, static half scale model jet noise experiments were conducted. Acoustic data were recorded for microphone angles of 45 deg to 155 deg with jet conditions for the model scale nozzle corresponding closely to those at 55, 73 and 97 percent of corrected rated speed for the full scale engine. These data are useful for determining the relative importance of jet and core noise in the static full scale engine test data and will in turn allow for a proper evaluation of flight effects on the exhaust noise results. The model scale data are also compared with the coaxial jet noise prediction. Above 1000 Hz, the prediction is nominally 0 to 3 dB higher than the data. The arithmetic mean of the differences between the experimental OASPL and the predicted OASPL for all angles for each run ranged from 0 to -3.2 dB. The standard deviation of all the OASPL differences is 2.2 dB. The discrepancies are greatest at low primary jet velocities and appear to be due to inadequacy in the variable jet density exponent incorporated in the prediction procedure

Static jet noise test results of four 0.35 scale-model QCGAT mixer nozzles

As part of the NASA Quiet Clean General Aviation Turbofan (QCGAT) engine mixer-nozzle exhaust system program, static jet exhaust noise was recorded at microphone angles of 45 to 155 deg relative to the nozzle inlet for a conventional profile coaxial nozzle and three 12-lobed coaxial mixer nozzles. Both flows in all four nozzles are internally mixed before being discharged from a single exhaust nozzle. The conventional profile coaxial nozzle jet noise is compared to the current NASA Lewis coaxial jet noise prediction and after applying an adjustment to the predicted levels based on the ratio of the kinetic energy of the primary and secondary flows, the prediction is within a standard deviation of 0.9 dB of the measured data. The mass average (mixed flow) prediction is also compared to the noise data for the three mixer nozzles with a reasonably good fit after applying another kinetic energy ratio adjustment (standard deviation of 0.7 to 1.5 dB with the measured data). The tests included conditions for the full-scale engine at takeoff (T.O.), cutback (86% T.O.) and approach (67% T.O.)

Interim noise correlation for some OTW configurations using external jet-flow deflectors

Jet flap interaction acoustic data obtained statically from a model-scale study of STOL-OTW configurations with a conical nozzle mounted above the wing and using various external deflectors to provide jet-flow attachment are correlated. The acoustic data are correlated in terms that consider the jet/flap interaction noise contributions associated primarily with fluctuating lift, trailing edge, and configuration wake noise sources. Variables considered include deflector geometry, flap setting and wing size. Finally, the configuration overall noise levels are related to static lift and thrust measurements in order to provide insight into possible acoustic/aerodynamic performance trade-off benefits