35 research outputs found

    S region sequence, RNA polymerase II, and histone modifications create chromatin accessibility during class switch recombination

    Get PDF
    Immunoglobulin class switch recombination is governed by long-range interactions between enhancers and germline transcript promoters to activate transcription and modulate chromatin accessibility to activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID). However, mechanisms leading to the differential targeting of AID to switch (S) regions but not to constant (CH) regions remain unclear. We show that S and CH regions are dynamically modified with histone marks that are associated with active and repressed chromatin states, respectively. Chromatin accessibility is superimposable with the activating histone modifications, which extend throughout S regions irrespective of length. High density elongating RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) is detected in S regions, suggesting that the transcription machinery has paused and stalling is abolished by deletion of the S region. We propose that RNAP II enrichment facilitates recruitment of histone modifiers to generate accessibility. Thus, the histone methylation pattern produced by transcription localizes accessible chromatin to S regions, thereby focusing AID attack

    Overlapping activation-induced cytidine deaminase hotspot motifs in Ig class-switch recombination

    No full text
    Ig class-switch recombination (CSR) is directed by the long and repetitive switch regions and requires activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID). One of the conserved switch-region sequence motifs (AGCT) is a preferred site for AID-mediated DNA-cytosine deamination. By using somatic gene targeting and recombinase-mediated cassette exchange, we established a cell line-based CSR assay that allows manipulation of switch sequences at the endogenous locus. We show that AGCT is only one of a family of four WGCW motifs in the switch region that can facilitate CSR. We go on to show that it is the overlap of AID hotspots at WGCW sites on the top and bottom strands that is critical. This finding leads to a much clearer model for the difference between CSR and somatic hypermutation
    corecore