26 research outputs found

    Video Cultures: Television Sociology in the “New TV” Age

    Get PDF
    We argue that the most significant and influential research on television over the past five decades positions the medium as a key site for addressing the complex interrelationship between culture and institutional/organizational power. Granting that such work is theoretically and methodologically diverse, we employ an organizational frame that groups political-economic approaches on the one hand and cultural approaches on the other. Political-economic approaches largely attend to issues of power at a macro level, focusing on how ownership and control of television along with the organization of television production practices shape and influence content; cultural approaches focus more on the expressive and symbolic dimensions of television programming and reception. At the same time, contemporary changes in the medium threaten to make past research on television appear quaint and anachronistic. The industry\u27s transformation of television into continually emerging sets of multifaceted digital-interactive technologies challenges researchers to draw enduring perspectives from the older work and assess how they apply to the new-media environment. Consequently, we suggest the term “video cultures” in lieu of “television sociology” as a way of capturing future trends. 10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.14312

    Refining Explosive Safety Outreach

    Get PDF
    Explosives safety awareness programs must identify the target audience and communicate easily understood concepts. To be effective, an audience must apply the concepts presented; however, this is not enough. The program and its message must also be adaptable to a variety of audiences based on how they assimilate information. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has at least 100 years of safety education experience. Over this time, explosives safety messages underwent several evolutions

    De l’importance d’ĂȘtre ordinaire

    Get PDF
    Si, aujourd’hui, les chaĂźnes cĂąblĂ©es payantes et autres plates-formes de vidĂ©os Ă  la demande proposent de plus en plus de sĂ©ries au scĂ©nario trĂšs Ă©laborĂ©, interprĂ©tĂ©es par les plus grands noms d’Hollywood, Ă  l’opposĂ© du spectre de l’offre tĂ©lĂ©visuelle on trouve notamment les talk-shows et les programmes de tĂ©lĂ©rĂ©alitĂ©. Si les premiers rapprochent l’expĂ©rience tĂ©lĂ©visuelle de celle du cinĂ©ma, les seconds semblent l’en Ă©loigner d’autant plus. En effet, ces Ă©missions se caractĂ©risent par le fait qu’elles produisent, mettent en Ɠuvre et vendent de l’« ordinarité » [ordinariness]. Les Ă©missions de tĂ©lĂ©rĂ©alitĂ©, tout comme les talk-shows qui sont plutĂŽt diffusĂ©s en journĂ©e, sont Ă  l’origine de nombreux changements dans l’univers de la production tĂ©lĂ©visuelle : nouvelles formes de travail, nouvelles stratĂ©gies de programmation, nouvelle esthĂ©tique, mais aussi des formes plus « ordinaires » de cĂ©lĂ©britĂ© et surtout – c’est ce qui est au cƓur de notre propos dans cet article – de nouvelles dĂ©finitions du « talent ». Nous proposons donc d’étudier ces programmes fondĂ©s sur la rĂ©alitĂ©, Ă  partir de la maniĂšre dont le concept de « talent » s’y nĂ©gocie. Sachant que ces contenus sont en grande partie dĂ©finis par leur recours Ă  des personnes ordinaires plutĂŽt qu’à des comĂ©dien·ne·s professionnel·le·s, et Ă  des scĂ©narios peu structurĂ©s (ou « situations »), plutĂŽt qu’à des scĂšnes Ă©crites et rĂ©pĂ©tĂ©es, nous nous demandons en quoi consiste le talent dans cette configuration, comment il est cultivĂ© et (ce) qui en est Ă  l’origine.Pay-for-view cable and other on-demand delivery systems are increasingly populated by high-concept dramatic series featuring some of the biggest names in Hollywood, whereas, on the other side of the tracks, we find, among other things, talk shows, and reality programming, which trade in the production and performance of “ordinariness.” While the former moves us closer to a cinematic experience, the latter presumably moves us farther away. Reality programs, like daytime talk shows before them, have generated new labor practices, new programming strategies and production aesthetics, more “ordinary” forms of celebrity, and, most important for our purposes here, new definitions of “talent.” Our interest in these genres turns on the concept of “talent” and how talent is brokered in the context of reality-based media. If such media are largely defined by the use of ordinary people instead of professional actors, and by loosely structured scenarios or “situations” in lieu of formal scripts and rehearsals, then of what does talent consist, and who/what is responsible for cultivating it?Hoy en dĂ­a, los canales pagados de televisiĂłn por cable y otras plataformas de video a la carta ofrecen cada vez mĂĄs series con un guiĂłn muy elaborado, interpretado por las figuras mĂĄs importantes de Hollywood, en contraposiciĂłn al espectro de la oferta televisiva, donde encontramos talk shows y reality shows. Si los primeros acercan la experiencia televisiva a la del cine, los segundos parecen alejarla aĂșn mĂĄs. En efecto, estos programas se caracterizan dado que producen, implementan y venden «ordinariedad». Los reality shows, como los talk shows, que se emiten durante el dĂ­a, son el origen de muchos cambios en el mundo de la producciĂłn televisiva: nuevas formas de trabajo, nuevas estrategias de programaciĂłn, una nueva estĂ©tica, pero tambiĂ©n formas mĂĄs «ordinarias» de celebridad, y sobre todo –y es esto lo que constituye el centro de nuestra discusiĂłn en este artĂ­culo– nuevas definiciones de «talento». Por ello nos proponemos estudiar estos programas basados en la realidad, partiendo de la forma en que se negocia el concepto de «talento». Sabiendo que estos contenidos estĂĄn definidos, en gran medida, por el uso de gente comĂșn y corriente en lugar de actores profesionales y escenarios (o «situaciones») no estructurados en lugar de escenas escritas y repetidas, nos preguntamos ÂżquĂ© es el talento en esta configuraciĂłn, cĂłmo se desarrolla, quĂ© y quiĂ©n estĂĄ detrĂĄs de Ă©l

    Moyo Vol. VIII N 2

    Get PDF
    Durica, Paul. Editor\u27s Letter . 4. Fisher, Dan. Heaven for Thunder (Thoughts on the Last Execution) . 5. Anshuman, Karan. Return to Sender (Mail-Order Brides Log-On Love) . 6. Grindstaff, Michelle. Madonna or Whore (Language Traps Female Sexuality) . 7. Thackeray, Alex. Strike Against the Right (Canada Collegians Take Action) . 8. Dotson, Dorothy. Tori Listening to Mullet Boy . 10. Stine, Alison. Tori Story (Secrets of a Toriphile: Good Girl Gets Plugged) . 11. Barret, Laura. Late Night Crush (Girl Crazy for Conan) . 15. Hankinson, Tom. Environmentally friendly, or Else (DURP tough on DU Junk) . 16. Bussan, David. Fantasy\u27s Island (Alums Find Paradise in Northern Cyprus) . 18. Burt, Kara. Innocents on Break (Students Exercise Alternatives in New York) . 21. Werne, Kirsten. Two Turntables and a Ten-Gallon Hat . 23. Million, Chris. Friendship a Modem Away, Sigh (AOL Alters Denison Social Scene) . 34

    Hegemonic Masculinity on the Sidelines of Sport

    No full text
    Nearly a quarter of a century old, the concept of hegemonic masculinity as developed by R. W. Connell remains both influential and contested among gender scholars. In this essay, we use our research on coed cheerleading in the United States as a springboard to explore the bounds and limits of hegemonic masculinity as both cultural script and analytic construct. Cheerleading constitutes a public stage for ‘doing gender’ in ways that highlight normative, taken-for-granted notions of gender difference; consequently, we use cheerleading as a vehicle for asking under what circumstances and to what degree heterosexuality remains central to the enactment of hegemonic masculinity, which reflects a larger question about the flexibility of the concept and its openness to contestation and change. Building on the work of Connell and others, we stress the need for relational analyses of gender when studying both masculinities and femininities, as well as the importance of linking individual-level data to broader structures of gendered power and inequality

    Role of αPhe-291 Residue in the Phosphate-Binding Subdomain of Catalytic Sites of Escherichia Coli ATP Synthase

    No full text
    The role of αPhe-291 residue in phosphate binding by Escherichia coli F1F0-ATP synthase was examined. X-ray structures of bovine mitochondrial enzyme suggest that this residue resides in close proximity to the conserved ÎČR246 residue. Herein, we show that mutations αF291D and αF291E in E. coli reduce the ATPase activity of F1F0 membranes by 350-fold. Yet, significant oxidative phosphorylation activity is retained. In contrast to wild-type, ATPase activities of mutants were not inhibited by MgADP-azide, MgADP-fluoroaluminate, or MgADP-fluoroscandium. Whereas, 7-chloro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD-Cl) inhibited wild-type ATPase essentially completely, ATPase in mutants was inhibited maximally by ∌75%, although reaction still occurred at residue ÎČTyr-297, proximal to αPhe-291 in the phosphate-binding pocket. Inhibition characteristics supported the conclusion that NBD-Cl reacts in ÎČE (empty) catalytic sites, as shown previously by X-ray structure analysis. Phosphate protected against NBD-Cl inhibition in wild-type but not in mutants. In addition, our data suggest that the interaction of αPhe-291 with phosphate during ATP hydrolysis or synthesis may be distinct
    corecore