Physical Activity and Risk of Lymphoma:A Meta-Analysis

<p>Background: Physical activity has a protective effect on some types of cancer. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to explore the literature on the association between physical activity and risk of lymphoma.</p><p>Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted for cohort and case-control studies examining the association between self-reported physical activity and risk of lymphoma. Depending on statistical heterogeneity, a random or fixed effects model was used to estimate the summary OR and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p>Results: Seven case-control studies and 5 cohort studies were included. When data from both study designs were combined, no significant influence of physical activity on risk of lymphoma was found (pooled OR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.79-1.02; P = 0.10). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant protective influence of physical activity on risk of lymphoma in case-control studies (pooled OR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.96; P = 0.02). In contrast, cohort studies, which have a higher level of evidence than case-control studies, confirm the results of the primary meta-analysis (pooled OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88-1.19; P = 0.76). A subsequent subgroup analysis found no significant differences between results for Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (chi(2) = 0.16; P = 0.69), nor between results for recreational and occupational activities (chi(2) = 1.01; P = 0.31).</p><p>Conclusions: Epidemiologic research indicates no significant influence of physical activity on risk of lymphoma.</p><p>Impact: Future research should examine the association between sedentary behavior and risk of lymphoma and investigate the dose-response and timing effect of physical activity on risk of lymphoma. (c) 2013 AACR.</p>

High-dose imatinib versus high-dose imatinib in combination with intermediate-dose cytarabine in patients with first chronic phase myeloid leukemia:A randomized phase III trial of the Dutch-Belgian HOVON study group

Despite the revolutionary change in the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with the introduction of imatinib, patients with resistant disease still pose a considerable problem. In this multicenter, randomized phase III trial, we investigate whether the combination of high-dose imatinib and intermediate-dose cytarabine compared to high-dose imatinib alone, improves the rate of major molecular response (MMR) in newly diagnosed CML patients. This study was closed prematurely because of declining inclusion due to the introduction of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and only one third of the initially required patients were accrued. One hundred nine patients aged 18-65 years were randomly assigned to either imatinib 800 mg (n = 55) or to imatinib 800 mg in combination with two successive cycles of cytarabine 200 mg/m2 for 7 days (n = 54). After a median follow-up of 41 months, 67 % of patients were still on protocol treatment. The MMR rate at 12 months was 56 % in the imatinib arm and 48 % in the combination arm (p = 0.39). Progression-free survival was 96 % after 1 year and 89 % after 4 years. Four-year overall survival was 97 %. Adverse events grades 3 and 4 were more common in the combination arm. The addition of intermediate-dose of cytarabine to imatinib did not improve the MMR rate at 12 months. However, the underpowering of the study precludes any definitive conclusions. This trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl (NTR674).</p

High-dose imatinib versus high-dose imatinib in combination with intermediate-dose cytarabine in patients with first chronic phase myeloid leukemia:A randomized phase III trial of the Dutch-Belgian HOVON study group

Despite the revolutionary change in the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with the introduction of imatinib, patients with resistant disease still pose a considerable problem. In this multicenter, randomized phase III trial, we investigate whether the combination of high-dose imatinib and intermediate-dose cytarabine compared to high-dose imatinib alone, improves the rate of major molecular response (MMR) in newly diagnosed CML patients. This study was closed prematurely because of declining inclusion due to the introduction of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and only one third of the initially required patients were accrued. One hundred nine patients aged 18-65 years were randomly assigned to either imatinib 800 mg (n = 55) or to imatinib 800 mg in combination with two successive cycles of cytarabine 200 mg/m2 for 7 days (n = 54). After a median follow-up of 41 months, 67 % of patients were still on protocol treatment. The MMR rate at 12 months was 56 % in the imatinib arm and 48 % in the combination arm (p = 0.39). Progression-free survival was 96 % after 1 year and 89 % after 4 years. Four-year overall survival was 97 %. Adverse events grades 3 and 4 were more common in the combination arm. The addition of intermediate-dose of cytarabine to imatinib did not improve the MMR rate at 12 months. However, the underpowering of the study precludes any definitive conclusions. This trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl (NTR674).</p

Efficacy of escalated imatinib combined with cytarabine in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Abstract. BACKGROUND: In order to improve the molecular response rate and prevent resistance to treatment, combination therapy with different dosages of imatinib and cytarabine was studied in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the HOVON-51 study. DESIGN AND METHODS: Having reported feasibility previously, we hereby report the efficacy of escalated imatinib (200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg or 800 mg) in combination with two cycles of intravenous cytarabine (200 mg/m(2) or 1000 mg/m(2) days 1 to 7) in 162 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 55 months, the 5-year cumulative incidences of complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response, and complete molecular response were 89%, 71%, and 53%, respectively. A higher Sokal risk score was invers

Imatinib discontinuation in chronic phase myeloid leukaemia patients in sustained complete molecular response:A randomised trial of the Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial for Haemato-Oncology (HOVON)

<p>Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment in responding chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients is generally continued indefinitely. In this randomised phase II trial, we investigated whether CML patients in molecular response(4.5) (MR4.5, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) after previous combination therapy with imatinib and cytarabine may discontinue imatinib treatment safely.</p><p>Patients and methods: Thirty-three patients from the HOVON 51 study with an MR4.5 for at least 2 years who were still on imatinib treatment were randomised between continuation of imatinib (arm A, n = 18) or discontinuation of imatinib (arm B, n = 15).</p><p>Results: After a median follow up of 36 months since randomisation, 3 patients (17%) in arm A and 10 patients (67%) in arm B had a molecular relapse. All 3 relapsing patients in arm A had also stopped imatinib after randomisation. All but one relapsing patient relapsed within 7 months after discontinuation of imatinib. The molecular relapse rate at 12 and 24 months after randomisation was 0% and 6% (arm A) and 53% and 67% (arm B) respectively. As-treated analysis revealed 56% and 61% relapses at 1 and 2 years since cessation in patients who discontinued imatinib, in contrast to 0% of patients who continued imatinib. All evaluable patients remained sensitive to imatinib after reinitiation and regained a molecular response.</p><p>Conclusion: Our data suggest that discontinuation of imatinib is safe in patients with durable MR4.5. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</p>