CAN METABOLIC SYNDROME AFFECT THE EFFICACY OUTCOMES OF COMBINATION THERAPY WITH DAILY TADALAFIL 5MG PLUS TAMSULOSIN 0.4MG IN MEN WITH LUTS AND ED?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Metabolic Syndrome (METS) has a high prevalence (26.5%–55.6%) in men with LUTS and erectile dysfunction (ED). Daily tadalafil 5mg intake is currently recognized as an effective pharmacological treatment for male LUTS, alone or in combination with alpha-lithics such as tamsulosin 0,4mg, ensuring a greater LUTS relieve. Aim of this study is to assess if METS could affect the efficacy of combination therapy with daily tadalafil 5mg plus tamsulosin 0,4mg in men with LUTS and ED. METHODS: Across 12 months, fifty consecutive patients aged >40 to 80 years, with moderate to severe LUTS (IPSS >7) and mild to severe ED (IIEF-5 <22) were enrolled and treated with the previous combination therapy for 12 weeks. The assessment of patients included age, body mass index (BMI), METS features - waist circumference (WC), blood pressure, clinical laboratory parameters- digital rectal examination, IPSS, OABq, uroflowmetry and postvoid residual (PVR) volume, IIEF-5. METS was defined according to NCEP ATP III. Differences were calculated by unpaired sample t-test at baseline and 12 weeks. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for between-group differences. RESULTS: Among 50 patients enrolled, 31 (62.0%) had METS. Mean age was similar with 65.5 years (9.1) in patients without METS and 67.1 years (7.2) in METS patients, p=0.133. Baseline IPSS, OAB-q and IPSS QoL were significantly higher in patients with METS (p<0.05), while IIEF was higher in patients without METS (p=0.039) at baseline (Table1). After 3 months of combination therapy, IIEF, total IPSS and subscores, OAB-q and Qmax significantly improved in both groups. DeltaIPSS, deltaQMax and deltaIIEF were similar between groups (p>0.05). However, total IPSS, IPSS QoL, IPSS Voiding and IPSS Storage were significantly better at the end of the trial in men without METS. Conversely, 12wks IIEF was similar in patients with or without METS (16.3 vs 17.7 p=0.238) (Table2). CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil plus tamsulosin combi therapy represents an effective LUTS treatment in male, independently from METS. Despite a similar improvement of LUTS (delta), patients without METS obtained a significantly better LUTS relieve. Interestingly, the efficacy in ED was greater in men with METS and, at the end of trial, IEEF-5 scores were similar in the two groups

Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Context The correlation among metabolic syndrome, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is well established. In particular, CVD has been proposed as a potential risk factor for both LUTS progression and severity. Objective To evaluate whether LUTS severity can be considered as a significant risk factor of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the male population. Evidence acquisition A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The combination of the following keywords was adopted in a free-text strategy: benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and cardiovascular, cardio, major adverse cardiac events, MACE, heart disease, heart, myocardial infarction, myocardial, infarction, stroke, ischemic events, ischemic, cardiac death, coronary syndrome. We included all cross-sectional and longitudinal trials enrolling men and comparing the prevalence or incidence of MACE in men with moderate to severe LUTS compared with those without LUTS or with mild LUTS. The studies in which only nocturia was evaluated were excluded from the analysis. Evidence synthesis Of 477 retrieved articles, 5 trials longitudinally reported the incidence of MACE in patients with moderate to severe LUTS in comparisons to those with mild or no LUTS and 10 studies reported the prevalence of history of MACE at enrollment. All were included in the present meta-analysis. Among cross-sectional studies, 38 218 patients and 2527 MACE were included in the meta-analysis. The mean age of enrolled patients was 62.2 ± 8.0 yr. Presence of moderate to severe LUTS significantly increased the risk of reported history of MACE (p < 0.001). Metaregression analyses showed that the risk of MACE was lower in older patients and higher in those with diabetes. The association between LUTS-related MACE and diabetes was confirmed in a multivariate regression model after adjusting for age (adjusted r = 0.498; p < 0.0001). Longitudinal trials included 25 494 patients and 2291 MACE. The mean age of enrolled patients was 52.5 ± 5.5 yr, and mean follow-up was 86.8 ± 22.1 mo. Presence of moderate to severe LUTS was associated with an increased incidence of MACE compared with the rest of the sample (odds ratio: 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.13–2.50; p = 0.01). Conclusions Men with moderate to severe LUTS seem to have an increased risk of MACE. A holistic approach in considering the morbidities of aging men should be strongly encouraged and represents an important role for the practicing urologist. Patient summary We evaluated whether the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms could be considered as a significant risk factor for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the male population. We demonstrated that men with moderate to severe LUTS have an increased risk of MACE

Quality of Life and Sexual Health in the Aging of PCa Survivors.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in elderly men. The progressive ageing of the world male population will further increase the need for tailored assessment and treatment of PCa patients. The determinant role of androgens and sexual hormones for PCa growth and progression has been established. However, several trials on androgens and PCa are recently focused on urinary continence, quality of life, and sexual function, suggesting a new point of view on the whole endocrinological aspect of PCa. During aging, metabolic syndrome, including diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and central obesity, can be associated with a chronic, low-grade inflammation of the prostate and with changes in the sex steroid pathways. These factors may affect both the carcinogenesis processes and treatment outcomes of PCa. Any treatment for PCa can have a long-lasting negative impact on quality of life and sexual health, which should be assessed by validated self-reported questionnaires. In particular, sexual health, urinary continence, and bowel function can be worsened after prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or hormone treatment, mostly in the elderly population. In the present review we summarized the current knowledge on the role of hormones, metabolic features, and primary treatments for PCa on the quality of life and sexual health of elderly Pca survivors

Which Drug to Discontinue 3 Months After Combination Therapy of Tadalafil plus Tamsulosin for Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptom and Erectile Dysfunction? Results of a Prospective Observational Trial

Background: Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin and tadalafil for men with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) and/or erectile dysfunction (ED) are defined. However, there are only a few pilot studies on combination therapy with these drugs for men with lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS)/BPE and ED. Moreover, preliminary reports are limited to 12 wk, without any information about subsequent therapies. Objective: To evaluate the impact of discontinuation of tamsulosin versus tadalafil 12 wk after combination therapy. Design, setting, and participants: Fifty consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe LUTS (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] > 7) and mild-to-severe ED (International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5] < 22) were treated with combination therapy (tamsulosin 0.4 mg/d plus tadalafil 5 mg/d) for 12 wk. After 12 wk, 25 patients discontinued tamsulosin (Group TAD), while 25 patients discontinued tadalafil (Group TAM). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Efficacy variables were IPSS (total, voiding, storage) and IIEF-5. Paired samples t test and analysis of variance were used. Results and limitations: Groups TAD and TAM presented similar features (age, BMI, metabolic profile) including symptoms scores at baseline. Similar and significant improvements in IPSS (total, voiding, and storage) and IIEF-5 were recorded in both groups after 12 wk of combination therapy (all p < 0.001). Total IPSS was similar between the two groups at the end of the trial. However, we found between-group significant differences from baseline to 24 wk and from 12 to 24 wk in storage-IPSS (Group TAD: –3.32 vs Group TAM: –1.24, p = 0.002; Group TAD: +0.24 vs Group TAM: +1.20, p = 0.040, respectively) and in IIEF-5 (Group TAD: +4.64 vs Group TAM: +0.16, p < 0.001; Group TAD: –1.64 vs Group TAM: –4.40, p = 0.003). No significant treatment-related adverse event was recorded in both groups. Conclusions: After 12 wk of combination therapy, monotherapy with tadalafil for further 12 wk allows to preserve the improvement of storage IPSS and IIEF-5, in addition to total IPSS. Patient summary: In this report we evaluated the discontinuation of tamsulosin or tadalafil after 12 wk of combination therapy. We found that tadalafil monotherapy, for a further 12 wk, aids in retaining the improvement of storage symptoms and erectile function

Tadalafil 5 mg Alone or in Combination with Tamsulosin 0.4 mg for the Management of Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction: Results of a Prospective Observational Trial.

Tadalafil 5 mg represents the standard for men with Erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). We carried out an observational trial aiming to assess the efficacy and safety of Tadalafil compared with Tadalafil plus Tamsulosin. Seventy-five patients complaining of ED and LUTS were treated for 12-weeks with Tadalafil plus placebo (TAD+PLA-group) or with combination therapy tadalafil plus tamsulosin (TAD+TAM-group). Efficacy variables were: International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and safety assessments. Data were evaluated using paired samples T-test (baseline vs. 12-weeks) and analysis of variance (Δgroup-TAD+PLA vs. Δgroup-TAD+TAM). At baseline, both groups presented similar characteristics and symptoms scores (all: p > 0.05). From baseline to 12-weeks, all the subjects showed a significant improvement of IIEF, total-IPSS, storage-IPSS, Qmax (all: p < 0.001). Conversely, a significant improvement of voiding-IPSS was observed in TAD+TAM-group (−3.5 points, p < 0.001). Indeed, TAD+PLA-group showed a not significant improvement of voiding-IPSS (−2.0 points, p = 0.074). When we compared between-groups differences at 12-weeks, IIEF (p = 0.255), total-IPSS (p = 0.084) and storage-IPSS (p = 0.08) did not show any statistically significant differences, whereas, voiding-IPSS and Qmax were significantly better in TAD+TAM-group (p = 0.006 and p = 0.027, respectively). No severe treatment adverse events (TAEs) were reported in both groups. Tadalafil achieved the same improvements of IIEF, total-IPSS, storage-IPSS when compared to combination therapy. Instead, Qmax and voiding-IPSS were better managed with combination therapy, without change of TAEs

A Systematic Review of Patients’ Values, Preferences, and Expectations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Context: Understanding men's values and preferences in the context of personal, physical, emotional, relational, and social factors is important in optimising patient counselling, facilitating treatment decision-making, and improving guideline recommendations. Objective: To systematically review the available evidence regarding the values, preferences, and expectations of men towards the investigation and treatment (conservative, pharmacological, and surgical) of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Evidence acquisition: We searched electronic databases until August 31, 2020 for quantitative and qualitative studies that reported values and preferences regarding the investigation and treatment of LUTS in men. We assessed the quality of evidence and risk of bias using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and GRADE Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) approaches. Evidence synthesis: We included 25 quantitative studies, three qualitative studies, and one mixed-methods study recruiting 9235 patients. Most men reported urodynamic testing to be acceptable, despite discomfort or embarrassment, as it significantly informs treatment decisions (low certainty evidence). Men preferred conservative and less risky treatment options, but the preference varied depending on baseline symptom severity and the risk/benefit characteristics of the treatment (moderate certainty). Men preferred pharmacological treatments with a low risk of erectile dysfunction and those especially improving urgency incontinence (moderate certainty). Other important preference considerations included reducing the risk of acute urinary retention or surgery (moderate certainty). Conclusions: Men prefer lower-risk management options that have fewer sexual side effects and are primarily effective at improving urgency incontinence and nocturia. Overall, the evidence was rated to be of low to moderate certainty. This review can facilitate the treatment decision-making process and improve the trustworthiness of guideline recommendations. Patient summary: We thoroughly reviewed the evidence addressing men's values and preferences regarding the management of urinary symptoms and found that minimising adverse effects is particularly important. Further research to understand other factors that matter to men is required. (C) 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Peer reviewe