The Waning of BNT162b2 Vaccine Effectiveness for SARS-CoV-2 Infection Prevention over Time: A Test-Negative Study in Health Care Professionals of a Health Department from January 2021 to December 2021

The duration of protection of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection has been evaluated in previous studies, but uncertainty remains about the persistence of effectiveness over time and the ideal timing for booster doses. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers (HCWs) at a tertiary hospital depending on time elapsed since the completion of a two-dose vaccination regimen. We conducted a case–control with negative test study between 25 January and 12 December 2021 that included 1,404 HCWs who underwent an active infection diagnostic test (AIDT) to rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection due to COVID-19 suspicion or prior close contact with patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection 12 to 120 days after completing the full two-dose vaccination regimen was 91.9%. Then, aVE decreased to 63.7% between 121 to 240 days after completing the full two-dose regimen and to 37.2% after 241 days since the second dose. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCWs remains highly effective after 12 to 120 days have elapsed since the administration of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine; however, effectiveness decreases as time elapses since its administration

Impact of COVID-19 on the degree of compliance with hand hygiene: a repeated cross-sectional study

Hand hygiene (HH) is the paramount measure used to prevent healthcare associated infections. A repeated cross-sectional study was undertaken with direct observation of the degree of compliance on HH of healthcare personnel during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Between, 2018-2019, 9,083 HH opportunities were considered, and 5,821 in 2020-2022. Chi squared tests were used to identify associations. The crude and adjusted odds ratios were used along with a logistic regression model for statistical analyses. Compliance on HH increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 54.5% (95% CI: 53.5, 55.5) to 70.1% (95% CI: 68.9, 71.2) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase was observed in four of the five key moments of HH established by the World Health Organization (WHO) (p<0.05), except at moment 4. The factors that were significantly and independently associated with compliance were the time period considered, type of healthcare-personnel, attendance at training sessions, knowledge of HH and WHO guidelines, and availability of hand disinfectant alcoholic solution in pocket format. Highest HH compliance occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, reflecting a positive change in healthcare-personnel’s behavior regarding HH recommendations.We received funding through the Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL) plan for scientific and technical research and innovation project number 2021-0392

Degree of compliance with hand hygiene recommendations by health care personnel in an emergency department before and after the COVID-19 pandemic

Fundamentos: La Higiene de Manos (HM) es la medida más importante para prevenir las infecciones asociadas a la asistencia sanitaria. El objetivo de este trabajo fue conocer el impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19 en el grado de cumplimiento (GC) de la HM en un Servicio de Urgencias (SU). Métodos: Estudio transversal. Se calculó el GC de la HM en el SU desde 2005 hasta 2021. Se estudió la asociación entre el GC de la HM y distintas variables (edad, sexo, estamento, área de urgencias, momento de la OMS, etc) calculando la Odds Ratio (OR) y su intervalo de confianza al 95% (IC95%). Para estudiar el impacto de la pandemia, se comparó el GC de la HM antes y después del inicio de la pandemia de COVID-19, se calculó la OR y su IC95%. Resultados: El GC de la HM aumentó al 75,9% (IC95%: 68,6%-83,2%) en el periodo posterior al inicio de la pandemia con respecto al periodo de referencia anterior que fue del 48,9% (IC95%: 43,4%-54,5%) (p<0,001). Los factores asociados de forma significativa e independiente al GC de la HM fueron el periodo de tiempo (antes o después de la pandemia), asistir a sesiones formativas, disponer de solución alcohólica en formato bolsillo y los momentos 3,4 y 5 de la OMS. Conclusiones: El GC de la HM en el SU ha alcanzado el máximo valor en 17 años de monitorización tras la pandemia de COVID-19. Este incremento refleja un cambio muy positivo en el comportamiento del personal sanitario con respecto a la HM.Background: Hand Hygiene (HH) is the most important measure to prevent healthcare-associated infections. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the degree of compliance (DC) of HH in an Emergency Department (ED). Methods: Cross-sectional study. DC of HH in the ED was calculated from 2005 to 2021. We studied the association between DC of HH and different variables (age, sex, status, ED area, time of WHO, etc.) by calculating the Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI). To study the impact of the pandemic, we compared the C of HH before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, calculated the OR and its 95%CI. Results: DC of HH increased to 75.9% (95%CI: 68.6%-83.2%) in the period after pandemic onset from the previous baseline period of 48.9% (95%CI: 43.4%-54.5%) (p<0.001). Factors significantly and independently associated with DC of HH were time period (before or after pandemic), attending training sessions, having alcohol solution in pocket format and WHO moments 3,4 and 5. Conclusions: DC of HH in the ED has reached the highest value in 17 years of monitoring following the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase reflects a very positive change in the behavior of healthcare personnel with respect to HH

Estimated Costs Associated with Surgical Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy

Among healthcare-associated infections, surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most frequent in Spain. The aim of this work was to estimate the costs of SSIs in patients who underwent a cholecystectomy at the Hospital General Universitario de Alicante (Spain) between 2012–2017. This was a prospective observational cohort study. The Active Epidemiological Surveillance Program at our hospital recorded all the cholecystectomies performed. Risk factors associated with the development of SSIs were determined by multivariate analysis and two homogeneous comparison groups were obtained by using the propensity score. The number of extra days of hospital stay were recorded for patients with an SSI and with the cost per hospitalised day data, the additional cost attributed to SSIs was calculated. A total of 2200 cholecystectomies were considered; 110 patients (5.0%) developed an SSI. The average length of hospital stay was 5.6 days longer among patients with an SSI. The cost per SSI was EUR 1890.60 per patient, with the total cost for this period being EUR 207,961.60. SSIs after cholecystectomy lead to a prolongation of hospital stay and an increase in economic costs. It is essential to implement infection surveillance and control programs to reduce SSIs, improve patient safety, and reduce economic burden

Efectividad de la vacuna de la gripe para prevenir casos graves. Temporada 2018/2019

Resumen: Objetivo: Conocer la efectividad de la vacuna de la gripe de la temporada 2018/2019 para la prevención de casos graves de gripe en un hospital terciario. Método: Estudio de casos y controles. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes hospitalizados con gripe confirmada por laboratorio durante la temporada 2018/2019. Los que cumplieron criterios de caso grave de gripe (neumonía, fallo multiorgánico, shock séptico, ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos o muerte) se consideraron caso. Los que no cumplían criterios de gravedad se consideraron controles. Se calculó la efectividad de la vacuna (EV) cruda y ajustada (para prevenir casos graves de gripe), así como su intervalo de confianza del 95%, mediante la fórmula EV = (1 − odds ratio) × 100. Resultados: La efectividad ajustada por grupo de edad y comorbilidad fue del 60,7% (20,5-80,5). En el análisis ajustado y restringido a cada sexo, grupo de edad y presencia de comorbilidad, la vacuna de la gripe tuvo un efecto positivo en todos los grupos y categorías, siendo la efectividad del 55,0% (2,6-79,2) en el grupo de edad de 65 años o más. Conclusiones: La vacunación antigripal redujo la gravedad de la gripe en los pacientes hospitalizados. Estos hallazgos deberían tenerse en cuenta para mejorar las estrategias de vacunación y alcanzar mejores coberturas vacunales en la población de riesgo, con la finalidad no solo de disminuir los casos de gripe, sino también su gravedad. Abstract: Objective: To know the effectiveness of the 2018/2019 flu vaccine for the prevention of severe cases of flu in a tertiary hospital. Method: Case-control study. We included all patients hospitalized with influenza confirmed by laboratory during 2018/2019 season. Those who met the criteria of severe case of influenza (pneumonia, multiorgan failure, septic shock, ICU admission or death) were considered as cases. Non severe cases of influenza were included in the control group. We calculated the effectiveness of the raw and adjusted vaccine (to prevent severe cases of influenza) and its 95% confidence interval using formula VE = (1 − odds ratio) × 100. Results: Effectiveness of flu vaccine adjusted by age group and comorbidities was 60.7% (20.5-80.5). In the analysis adjusted and restricted to each sex, age group and presence of comorbidities, the influenza vaccine had a positive effect in all groups and categories, with effectiveness in the age group 65 years or more being 55.0% (2.6-79.2). Conclusions: Flu vaccination reduced the severity of influenza in hospitalized patients. These findings should be taken into account to improve vaccination strategies and achieve better vaccination coverage in the high-risk population in order not only to decrease flu cases, but also their severity

Efectividad de la vacuna de la gripe hasta la semana 4 de la temporada 2018/2019

Background: Annual flu vaccination is the most effective measure to prevent the disease and its complications. Vaccine effectiveness (EV) varies from season to season, requiring annual re-evaluation. The objective of this work was to estimate the preliminary effectiveness of the influenza vaccine until epidemiological week 4 of the 2018/2019 season, in patients admitted to a third level hospital. Methods: The Test Negative Design (TDN) was carried out at the Hospital General Universitario de Alicante. Patients admitted with laboratory-confirmed influenza (RT-PCR positive for any influenza virus, in clinical sample of nasopharyngeal aspirate) and those with clinical suspicion of influenza and negative RT-PCR, from week 40 to week 4 of the 2018/2019 influenza season, were considered as controls. The vaccination coverage was calculated in the cases and in the controls, and the EV with its 95% confidence interval using the formula: EV = (1-Odds Ratio) x 100. Results: We included 524 patients: 58 cases and 466 controls. The overall EV for prevention of influenza cases was 42.5 % (95% CI -17.1 to 71.8) and for those over 1 year of age 63.7 % (95% CI 25.4 to 82.3). Conclusions: The 2018-2019 influenza vaccine is effective in preventing influenza cases in patients admitted up to week 4 of the 2018-19 season. Results are preliminary and may vary and should be re-evaluated at the end of the season.Fundamentos: La vacunación anual contra la gripe es la medida más efectiva para prevenir la enfermedad y sus complicaciones. La efectividad vacunal (EV) varía de una temporada a otra, lo que obliga a reevaluarla anualmente. El objetivo de este trabajo fue estimar la efectividad preliminar de la vacuna de la gripe hasta la semana epidemiológica 4 de la temporada 2018/2019, en pacientes ingresados en un hospital de tercer nivel. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de casos y controles test negativos en el Hospital General Universitario de Alicante. Se consideró caso a los pacientes ingresados con gripe confirmada por laboratorio (RT-PCR positiva para cualquier virus influenza, en muestra clínica de aspirado nasofaríngeo) y como controles a aquellos con sospecha clínica de gripe y RT-PCR negativa, desde la semana 40 hasta la 4 de la temporada de gripe 2018/2019. Se calculó la cobertura de vacunación en los casos y en los controles, y la EV con su intervalo de confianza al 95% mediante la fórmula: EV= (1-Odds Ratio) x 100. Resultados: Se incluyeron 524 pacientes: 58 casos y 466 controles. La EV global para la prevención de casos de gripe fue del 42,5 % (IC 95%: -17,1 a 71,8) y para mayores de 1 año de 63,7 % (IC 95%: 25,4 a 82,3). Conclusiones: La vacuna de la gripe 2018-19 es efectiva para prevenir los casos de gripe en pacientes ingresados hasta la semana 4 de la temporada 2018-2019. Los resultados son preliminares y podrían variar, por lo que deberán reevaluarse al final de la temporada

Effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine to preventing COVID-19 in healthcare personnel

Objetivo: Conocer la efectividad de la vacuna BNT162b2 en personal sanitario de un departamento de salud. Método: Estudio de casos y controles con prueba negativa. Se incluyó personal sanitario con sospecha de COVID-19 y personal sanitario que fue contacto estrecho de casos de COVID-19 entre el 25 de enero y el 6 de junio de 2021. Se les realizó prueba de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR) para SARS-CoV-2; aquellos con PCR positiva fueron considerados casos y aquellos con PCR negativa fueron considerados controles. Se calculó la efectividad vacunal ajustada (EVa) para prevenir casos de COVID-19 y su intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC95%), mediante la fórmula EV = (1 − odds ratio) × 100. Resultados: Se incluyeron 624 profesionales sanitarios; de ellos, 43 (6,9%) casos y 581 (93,1%) controles. La EVa de la pauta completa fue del 96,3% (IC95%: 82,5-99,2) y la de la pauta incompleta del 68,0% (IC95%: 30,0-85,4). Conclusiones: La administración de la pauta completa de vacuna es efectiva para la prevención de casos de COVID-19 en el personal sanitario.Objective: To assess the effectiveness of the vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (BNT162b2) in healthcare personnel of a health department. Method: Test-negative case̶control study. Healthcare personnel with suspected COVID-19 and healthcare personnel close contacts of COVID-19 cases were included between January 27th and June 6 th, 2021. They were PCR tested for SARS-CoV-2; those with positive PCR were considered cases and those with negative PCR were considered controls. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) to prevent COVID-19 cases and their 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated using the formula VE = (1 − odds ratio) × 100. Results: 624 healthcare personnel were included, of which 43 (6.9%) were considered cases and 581 (93.8%) controls. The aVE of the complete regimen was 96.3% (95%CI: 82.5̶99.2). The aVE of the incomplete pattern was 68.0% (95%CI: 30.0̶85.4). Conclusions: The administration of the complete pattern of BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is effective for the prevention of cases of COVID-19 in healthcare personnel

The Waning of BNT162b2 Vaccine Effectiveness for SARS-CoV-2 Infection Prevention over Time: A Test-Negative Study in Health Care Professionals of a Health Department from January 2021 to December 2021

The duration of protection of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection has been evaluated in previous studies, but uncertainty remains about the persistence of effectiveness over time and the ideal timing for booster doses. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers (HCWs) at a tertiary hospital depending on time elapsed since the completion of a two-dose vaccination regimen. We conducted a case&ndash;control with negative test study between 25 January and 12 December 2021 that included 1404 HCWs who underwent an active infection diagnostic test (AIDT) to rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection due to COVID-19 suspicion or prior close contact with patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection 12 to 120 days after completing the full two-dose vaccination regimen was 91.9%. Then, aVE decreased to 63.7% between 121 to 240 days after completing the full two-dose regimen and to 37.2% after 241 days since the second dose. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCWs remains highly effective after 12 to 120 days have elapsed since the administration of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine; however, effectiveness decreases as time elapses since its administration

Effectiveness of the systematic use of antimicrobial filters in the water taps of critical care units for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is the third leading aetiological agent in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and the one most frequently found in patients with pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation. In intensive care units (ICU), its appearance is associated with higher mortality, an increase in the days spent on ventilation, and hospital stay length and costs. Thus, evaluating strategies for preventing these infections is essential for their control. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the systematic use of antimicrobial filters in preventing PA infections in critical care units. Methods: This was an open experimental crossover study. A total of 2,156 patients admitted for more than 24 hours in critical care units were included, 1,129 of them in units with filters, and 1,027 in units without filters. The study groups were followed-up for 24 months and HAIs were checked for the presence of PA. Chi-squared test were used to compare the rate of HAIs between groups and we calculated 95% confidence intervals adjusted by Poisson regression for the rate ratio (RR) of the association magnitude. Results: Both groups were homogeneous in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic patient factors. The incidence of PA infections in the units with filters was 5.5 cases/1,000 hospitalized days and 5.4/1,000 hospitalized days for the units without water filters (RR = 1.09 [0.67-1.79]). Conclusions: Routine placing antimicrobial filters in the water taps in critical care units was not an effective means of preventing the emergence of HAIs caused by PA.This study has been funded by: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Carlos III Health Institute) through Fund for Health Research (FIS), Ministry of Health, Spanish Government. Project # PI15/01344; Generalitat Valenciana (Valencian Regional Government) Grants for Support to a Research or Technology Transfer Project. Project # APOTIP/2016/A/011; Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research through Grants to supplement the development of active research projects under the State Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation. Project # 180192 and Project # 190181