7 research outputs found

    University of Huddersfield APCs 2015 (Jan-June)

    No full text
    <p>This spreadsheet contains details of article processing charges (APCs) paid by the University of Huddersfield during the first half of 2015. The data is being collected as part of Jisc's APC data collection project to address the Total Cost of Ownership of scholarly communication (https://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/Jisc-Monitor/APC-data-collection/).</p

    Lohse_et_al_2012_Analysis

    No full text
    Mathematica notebook implementing the likelihood calculation. The summary files provided in Lohse_2012_data.tar are used as input

    Lohse_2012_data.tar

    No full text
    The python scripts polarize.py and polarizeSumStat condense a file of multiple alignmnets (fasta format) into either a list of binary alignmnets (O=ancestral, 1=derived state) or a list summary statitsics (for details see Mathematica notebook Lohse_et_al 2012_Analysis). Both are simple text files which use Mathematica's list notation. The archive Lohse_2012_data.tar contains both the python scripts and the data files for each of the four parasitoid species. These are used as input for the likelihood analysis (see in Mathematica notebook Lohse_et_al 2012_Analysis)

    WP7 scoping report on archiving and preserving OA monographs

    No full text
    Technical methods for effectively archiving complex digital research publications and for creating an integrated collections of content in different formats have not yet been developed. As part of COPIM, an international partnership of researchers, universities, librarians, open access book publishers and infrastructure providers, WP7 (Work Package 7) have begun by compiling a digital preservation risk register. This report builds on that work in offering an overview of existing preservation solutions for Open Access (OA) research monographs. It brings together interviews conducted with representatives from several university presses and OA presses, and draws on the discussions that took place in a workshop held in September 2020 with a range of professionals in the archiving and preservation domain. What the interviews and the workshop have indicated is the need for a consensus on file formats, further awareness and a culture shift to acknowledge and respond to the importance of digital preservation, further support and guidance for small and scholar-led publishers to assure equity in the publishing and preservation landscape, and a clear way forward regarding techniques to effectively preserve the components of complex digital monographs, including links and embedded content. A number of opportunities for future work have been highlighted, among them tools, guidance, developing new workflows, and nurturing a network of advocates in specific communities. These avenues for future work are further elaborated on at the end of this report.</p

    Guide to Creative Commons for Humanities and Social Science Monograph Authors (OAPENUK 2013)

    No full text
    <p>Developed by the OAPEN-UK team: Ellen Collins, Caren Milloy and Graham Stone and edited by James Baker, Martin Paul Eve and Ernesto Priego.</p> <p>This guide explores concerns expressed in public evidence given by researchers, learned societies and publishers to inquiries in the House of Commons and the House of Lords, and also concerns expressed by researchers working with the OAPEN-UK project. We have also identified a number of common questions and have drafted answers, which have been checked by experts including Creative Commons. The guide has been edited by active researchers, to make sure that it is relevant and useful to academics faced with making decisions about publishing. This guide is specifically about Creative Commons licences, not about open access in general.</p> <p>Readers can view the guide online (see below) or download a PDF copy. Print copies are also available – please contact Caren Milloy at JISC to order.</p
    corecore