30 research outputs found

    Differences emerge in visceral adipose tissue accumulation after selection for innate cardiovascular fitness

    No full text
    Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) has been reported to be inversely associated with visceral adipose tissue (VAT) accumulation, independent of body weight. However, the confounding effect of physical activity on the association between CRF and VAT remains inadequately addressed. Based on VO(2max), 143 sedentary, overweight women were dichotomized into high-fit (HF) and low-fit (LF) groups. Body composition and VAT were measured using DEXA and CT, respectively, and activity-related energy expenditure (AEE) was calculated using the doubly-labeled water technique. No differences were observed between HF and LF for BMI (HF: 28.2 ± 1.3; LF: 28.3 ± 1.31 kg/m(2)), total body weight (HF: 77.5 ± 6.8; LF: 77.9 ± 7.3 kg), total fat mass (HF: 33.5 ± 5.1; LF: 33.9 ± 4.4 kg), or AEE (HF: 439.9 ± 375.4; LF: 517.9 ± 298.7 kcal/day). Significant differences in visceral adiposity (HF: 68.5 ± 30.4; LF: 91.2 ± 31.8 cm(2); P < 0.001) and insulin sensitivity (HF: 5.1 ± 1.8; LF: 3.1 ± 2.4 S(I) ×10(−4)min(−1)/μIU/ml; P < 0.01) were observed between the high- and low-fitness groups, independent of age, race, and AEE. This study affirms previous findings that CRF is an important determinant of the accumulation of VAT, and this relationship is independent of physical activity

    Body fat distribution in white and black women: different patterns of intraabdominal and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue utilization with weight loss.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Intraabdominal adipose tissue (IAAT) is the body fat depot most strongly related to disease risk. Weight reduction is advocated for overweight people to reduce total body fat and IAAT, although little is known about the effect of weight loss on abdominal fat distribution in different races. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effects of diet-induced weight loss on changes in abdominal fat distribution in white and black women. DESIGN: We studied 23 white and 23 black women, similar in age and body composition, in the overweight state [mean body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 28.8] and the normal-weight state (mean BMI: 24.0) and 38 never-overweight control women (mean BMI: 23.4). We measured total body fat by using a 4-compartment model, trunk fat by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and cross-sectional areas of IAAT (at the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae) and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAAT) by using computed tomography. RESULTS: Weight loss was similar in white and black women (13.1 and 12.6 kg, respectively), as were losses of total fat, trunk fat, and waist circumference. However, white women lost more IAAT (P &lt; 0.001) and less SAAT (P &lt; 0.03) than did black women. Fat patterns regressed toward those of their respective control groups. Changes in waist circumference correlated with changes in IAAT in white women (r = 0.54, P &lt; 0.05) but not in black women (r = 0.19, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Despite comparable decreases in total and trunk fat, white women lost more IAAT and less SAAT than did black women. Waist circumference was not a suitable surrogate marker for tracking changes in the visceral fat compartment in black women
    corecore