Eine Neubewertung des Erdbebens vom 3. September 1770 bei Alfhausen (Niedersachsen)

Am 3. September 1770 fand bei Alfhausen im westlichen Niedersachsen ein Erdbeben statt. In der wissenschaftlichen Literatur wird es erstmals von SIEBERG(1940) erwähnt. Eine erste Abschätzung seiner Maximalintensität erfolgte durch AHoRNERu. a. (1970) mit I = VII (MSK). Danach würde das Erdbeben von Alfhausen zu den stärksten nachweisbaren seismischen Ereignissen im Norddeutschen Tiefland gehören. SIEBERG,der Ausgangspunkt für bisherige Intensitätsabschätzungen ist, gibt über die Herkunft der Quellen, die seiner Information zugrunde liegen, keine Auskunft. MEIER& GRÜNTHALfanden ein zeitgenössisches Dokument, das kurze Zeit nach dem Ereignis vom 3. September 1770 niedergeschrieben und am 3. November 1770 in: "Nützlicher Beylagen zum Osnabrückischen Intelligenz Blate" veröffentlicht wurde. Der Autor unterzeichnete seinen Artikel mit den Initialen J. H. B. P. (P in Antiqua), die mit Hilfe des Niedersächsischen Staatsarchivs in Osnabrück als J. H. BUCK,evangelischer Pastor von Neuenkirchen, identifiziert werden konnten. Die Aufzeichnungen von BUCKenthalten eine recht genaue Beschreibung der makroseismischen Erscheinungen des Alfhausen-Ereignisses. Ihre Analyse erlaubt, eine Neubewertung dieses Erdbebens und ermöglicht, die Angaben von SIEBERG(1940) und die darauf fußenden nachfolgenden Abschätzungen zu überprüfen. Die Ergebnisse der Analyse werden mitgeteilt, der seismologische Befund in den regionalgeologischen Rahmen eingeordnet und die mögliche Ursache für das Beben kurz dargestellt

The 2013 European seismic hazard model : key components and results

The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM13) results from a community-based probabilistic seismic hazard assessment supported by the EU-FP7 project “Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe” (SHARE, 2009–2013). The ESHM13 is a consistent seismic hazard model for Europe and Turkey which overcomes the limitation of national borders and includes a through quantification of the uncertainties. It is the first completed regional effort contributing to the “Global Earthquake Model” initiative. It might serve as a reference model for various applications, from earthquake preparedness to earthquake risk mitigation strategies, including the update of the European seismic regulations for building design (Eurocode 8), and thus it is useful for future safety assessment and improvement of private and public buildings. Although its results constitute a reference for Europe, they do not replace the existing national design regulations that are in place for seismic design and construction of buildings. The ESHM13 represents a significant improvement compared to previous efforts as it is based on (1) the compilation of updated and harmonised versions of the databases required for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, (2) the adoption of standard procedures and robust methods, especially for expert elicitation and consensus building among hundreds of European experts, (3) the multi-disciplinary input from all branches of earthquake science and engineering, (4) the direct involvement of the CEN/TC250/SC8 committee in defining output specifications relevant for Eurocode 8 and (5) the accounting for epistemic uncertainties of model components and hazard results. Furthermore, enormous effort was devoted to transparently document and ensure open availability of all data, results and methods through the European Facility for Earthquake Hazard and Risk (www.efehr.org)

The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: key components and results

The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM13) results from a community-based probabilistic seismic hazard assessment supported by the EU-FP7 project “Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe” (SHARE, 2009–2013). The ESHM13 is a consistent seismic hazard model for Europe and Turkey which overcomes the limitation of national borders and includes a through quantification of the uncertainties. It is the first completed regional effort contributing to the “Global Earthquake Model” initiative. It might serve as a reference model for various applications, from earthquake preparedness to earthquake risk mitigation strategies, including the update of the European seismic regulations for building design (Eurocode 8), and thus it is useful for future safety assessment and improvement of private and public buildings. Although its results constitute a reference for Europe, they do not replace the existing national design regulations that are in place for seismic design and construction of buildings. The ESHM13 represents a significant improvement compared to previous efforts as it is based on (1) the compilation of updated and harmonised versions of the databases required for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, (2) the adoption of standard procedures and robust methods, especially for expert elicitation and consensus building among hundreds of European experts, (3) the multi-disciplinary input from all branches of earthquake science and engineering, (4) the direct involvement of the CEN/TC250/SC8 committee in defining output specifications relevant for Eurocode 8 and (5) the accounting for epistemic uncertainties of model components and hazard results. Furthermore, enormous effort was devoted to transparently document and ensure open availability of all data, results and methods through the European Facility for Earthquake Hazard and Risk (www.​efehr.​org)

An earthquake catalogue for central, northern and northwestern Europe based on MW magnitudes

repor

Zwei angebliche Erdbeben in den Jahren 1303 und 1328 im heutigen Raum Kaliningrad

Grünthal G, Riedel P. Zwei angebliche Erdbeben in den Jahren 1303 und 1328 im heutigen Raum Kaliningrad. Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften. 2007;35.3:157-163

project PEGASOS by the Expert Group 2 (EG1b)

source zone characterization for the seismic hazard assessmen