The Trichoptera barcode initiative: a strategy for generating a species-level Tree of Life

DNA barcoding was intended as a means to provide species-level identifications through associating DNA sequences from unknown specimens to those from curated reference specimens. Although barcodes were not designed for phylogenetics, they can be beneficial to the completion of the Tree of Life. The barcode database for Trichoptera is relatively comprehensive, with data from every family, approximately two-thirds of the genera, and one-third of the described species. Most Trichoptera, as with most of life’s species, have never been subjected to any formal phylogenetic analysis. Here, we present a phylogeny with over 16 000 unique haplotypes as a working hypothesis that can be updated as our estimates improve. We suggest a strategy of implementing constrained tree searches, which allow larger datasets to dictate the backbone phylogeny, while the barcode data fill out the tips of the tree. We also discuss how this phylogeny could be used to focus taxonomic attention on ambiguous species boundaries and hidden biodiversity. We suggest that systematists continue to differentiate between ‘Barcode Index Numbers’ (BINs) and ‘species’ that have been formally described. Each has utility, but they are not synonyms. We highlight examples of integrative taxonomy, using both barcodes and morphology for species description. This article is part of the themed issue ‘From DNA barcodes to biomes’

DMPS-arsenic challenge test. I. Increased ur excretion of monomethylarsonic acid in humans given dimercaptopro sulfonate,

ABSTRACT The purpose of the present study was to evaluate in a novel manner the arsenic exposure of humans living in two towns in Northeastern Chile. Residents of one town drink water containing 593 g As/l. Those in the control town drink water containing 21 g As/l. Our hypothesis was that the administration of the chelating agent, 2,3-dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonic acid, Na salt (DMPS, DIMAVAL) would increase the urinary excretion of arsenic, alter the urinary profile of arsenic species and thus result in a better indication of the body load of arsenic and a better biomarker for arsenic exposure. The method used to evaluate these subjects was to give them 300 mg DMPS by mouth, after an overnight fast, and collect urine at specified time periods. The urine samples were analyzed for inorganic arsenic, monomethylarsonic acid (MMA), dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) and total arsenic by hydride generation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The results indicated that: 1) During the 2-hr period after DMPS administration, MMA represented 42%, inorganic As, 20 to 22% and DMA, 37 to 38% of the total urinary arsenic. The usual range of the MMA percentage in human urine has been 10 to 20%. The % MMA increased almost equally for both the arsenic-exposed and control subjects. 2) The exposed subjects had a greater urinary excretion of total arsenic, before and after DMPS administration, than the control subjects. 3) Although buccal cells were obtained only from a few subjects, the prevalence of mononucleated buccal cells, an indication of genotoxicity, was 5-fold greater for those who consumed drinking water with the higher arsenic content than among control subjects. Our conclusions are that 1) DMPS has a highly specific effect in humans on MMA metabolism and/or urinary excretion; 2) the human body stores substantial amounts of arsenic; and 3) the urinary arsenic concentration after DMPS administration may be more indicative of the body burden of arsenic because it was greater than that found before DMPS was given

The Trichoptera barcode initiative: a strategy for generating a species-level Tree of Life.

DNA barcoding was intended as a means to provide species-level identifications through associating DNA sequences from unknown specimens to those from curated reference specimens. Although barcodes were not designed for phylogenetics, they can be beneficial to the completion of the Tree of Life. The barcode database for Trichoptera is relatively comprehensive, with data from every family, approximately two-thirds of the genera, and one-third of the described species. Most Trichoptera, as with most of life's species, have never been subjected to any formal phylogenetic analysis. Here, we present a phylogeny with over 16 000 unique haplotypes as a working hypothesis that can be updated as our estimates improve. We suggest a strategy of implementing constrained tree searches, which allow larger datasets to dictate the backbone phylogeny, while the barcode data fill out the tips of the tree. We also discuss how this phylogeny could be used to focus taxonomic attention on ambiguous species boundaries and hidden biodiversity. We suggest that systematists continue to differentiate between 'Barcode Index Numbers' (BINs) and 'species' that have been formally described. Each has utility, but they are not synonyms. We highlight examples of integrative taxonomy, using both barcodes and morphology for species description.This article is part of the themed issue 'From DNA barcodes to biomes'