Survey of Period Variations of Superhumps in SU UMa-Type Dwarf Novae. VIII: The Eighth Year (2015-2016)

Continuing the project described by Kato et al. (2009, arXiv:0905.1757), we collected times of superhump maxima for 128 SU UMa-type dwarf novae observed mainly during the 2015-2016 season and characterized these objects. The data have improved the distribution of orbital periods, the relation between the orbital period and the variation of superhumps, the relation between period variations and the rebrightening type in WZ Sge-type objects. Coupled with new measurements of mass ratios using growing stages of superhumps, we now have a clearer and statistically greatly improved evolutionary path near the terminal stage of evolution of cataclysmic variables. Three objects (V452 Cas, KK Tel, ASASSN-15cl) appear to have slowly growing superhumps, which is proposed to reflect the slow growth of the 3:1 resonance near the stability border. ASASSN-15sl, ASASSN-15ux, SDSS J074859.55+312512.6 and CRTS J200331.3-284941 are newly identified eclipsing SU UMa-type (or WZ Sge-type) dwarf novae. ASASSN-15cy has a short (~0.050 d) superhump period and appears to belong to EI Psc-type objects with compact secondaries having an evolved core. ASASSN-15gn, ASASSN-15hn, ASASSN-15kh and ASASSN-16bu are candidate period bouncers with superhump periods longer than 0.06 d. We have newly obtained superhump periods for 79 objects and 13 orbital periods, including periods from early superhumps. In order that the future observations will be more astrophysically beneficial and rewarding to observers, we propose guidelines how to organize observations of various superoutbursts.Comment: 123 pages, 162 figures, 119 tables, accepted for publication in PASJ (including supplementary information

Crustal structure of the Mendeleev Rise and the Chukchi Plateau (Arctic Ocean) along the Russian wide-angle and multichannel seismic reflection experiment “Arctic-2012”

We present a seismic and density model for the crust and the uppermost mantle of the Arctic Ocean off-shore Chukotka down to a 40 km depth along a 740-km long latitudinal (at ca. 77°N) “Arctic-2012” wide-angle/MCS profile. Joint seismic and gravity modeling indicates significant differences in the crustal velocity and density structure of the northeastern Vilkitsky Trough, the Mendeleev Rise, the Chukchi Basin, and the Chukchi Plateau. The Vilkitsky Trough and the Chukchi Basin have a thin crust (23 km and 18 km, correspondingly), 6–8 km thick sedimentary cover, 3–6 km thick upper/middle crust (with the smallest thickness of 3–4 km beneath the Chukchi Basin), and 9–10 km thick lower crust. The uppermost mantle of the Chukchi Basin has a high density (3.27–3.31 g/cm3) and a low velocity (Vp ∼ 7.8 km/s), which we explain by 5–10% serpentinization of mantle peridotite at a 22–35 km depth as a result of crustal hyperextension and seawater penetration. The Chukchi Plateau and the Mendeleev Rise have a thick crust (28–29 km and 33–34 km, correspondingly), underlain by a normal mantle (Vp ∼ 8.0 km/s). The Chukchi Plateau has a 2‐4 km thick sedimentary cover, a thick (15–18 km) upper/middle crust with low-Vp, low-density lenses interpreted as magmatic intrusions, and a 9–12 km thick lower crust. The Mendeleev Rise has a 3–7 km thick sedimentary cover (most of which is formed by metasediments with a possible presence of volcanic rocks), a 7–8 km thick upper/middle crust, and a thick (20 km) lower crust which includes a 3–4 km thick high-velocity (Vp ∼ 7.3 km/s) underplated magmatic material. The high density anomaly (at depths >35 km) below the Mendeleev Rise is interpreted as an eclogitic body in the upper mantle lithosphere. Seismic Vp and Vp/Vs structure of the crust along the “Arctic-2012” profile indicates its continental nature: a 3–18 km thick upper/middle crustal layer with Vp ∼ 6.0–6.8 km/s and Vp/Vs ∼ 1.70–1.73 typical of felsic-intermediate continental upper crust is present along the entire profile. Strong variability of the crustal structure along the profile reflects its significant modification by metamorphism and magmatism, possibly related to the High-Arctic Large Igneous Province and localized lithosphere extension beneath the Chukchi Basin

EFFICIENCY OF PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OF VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY IN YOUNG CHILDREN IN RUSSIA DEPENDING ON THE REGION OF RESIDENCE (BASED ON THE RESULTS OF RODNICHOK-2 STUDY)

Medical examination of 360 children from four regions of Russia (Moscow, Astrakhan, Stavropol, Kazan) showed significant regional differences in the sufficiency and compensation of vitamin D deficiency at the baseline (Day 0) and established factors associated with vitamin D sufficiency on Day 0. The established interregional differences in vitamin D levels were not due to insolation, but primarily to adequate vitamin D supplementation received at the baseline. Vitamin D supplementation (an average of 894 ± 632.6 IU/day) significantly reduced the risk of vitamin D deficiency (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.09–0.26, P = 5.7 x 10–14). The study included the analysis of factors associated with the increase in 25(OH)D levels during the administration of Aquadetrim, identification of predictors of patient’s response and the analysis of identified predictors. The most important factor determining the patient’s response was the dose of vitamin D taken by the patient: 25(OH)D levels increased by 1 ng/ml with an increase in the dose of vitamin D by 90 IU per day. As can be seen from the above, the study results indicate that the vitamin D deficiency requires a long-term preventive therapy (for at least several months) with adequate doses of vitamin D (1000–2000 IU/day)