Innovative organotypic in vitro models for safety assessment: aligning with regulatory requirements and understanding models of the heart, skin, and liver as paradigms

The development of improved, innovative models for the detection of toxicity of drugs, chemicals, or chemicals in cosmetics is crucial to efficiently bring new products safely to market in a cost-effective and timely manner. In addition, improvement in models to detect toxicity may reduce the incidence of unexpected post-marketing toxicity and reduce or eliminate the need for animal testing. The safety of novel products of the pharmaceutical, chemical, or cosmetics industry must be assured; therefore, toxicological properties need to be assessed. Accepted methods for gathering the information required by law for approval of substances are often animal methods. To reduce, refine, and replace animal testing, innovative organotypic in vitro models have emerged. Such models appear at different levels of complexity ranging from simpler, self-organized three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures up to more advanced scaffold-based co-cultures consisting of multiple cell types. This review provides an overview of recent developments in the field of toxicity testing with in vitro models for three major organ types: heart, skin, and liver. This review also examines regulatory aspects of such models in Europe and the UK, and summarizes best practices to facilitate the acceptance and appropriate use of advanced in vitro models

In vivo tumorigenicity of the 20q11.21 amplicon in an engraftment model of hPSCs and differentiated liver cells

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are a promising source of somatic cells for clinical applications and disease modelling. However, during culture they accumulate genetic aberrations such as amplification of 20q11.21 which occurs in approximately 20% of extensively cultured hPSC lines and confers a BCL2L1-mediated survival advantage. During the production of the large number of cells required for transplantation and therapy these aberrations may become unavoidable which has important safety implications for therapies and may also impact upon disease modelling. Presently, these risks are poorly understood; whilst it is apparent that large-scale genetic aberrations can pose an oncogenic risk, the risks associated with smaller, more insidious changes have not been fully explored. In this report, the effects of engraftment of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and hESC-derived hepatocyte-like cells (HLCs) with and without amplification of the 20q11.21 minimal amplicon and isochromosome 20q (i20q) in SCID-beige mice are presented. The cells were tracked in vivo using a luminescent reporter over a period of approximately four months. Intrasplenic injection of hESCs showed greater engraftment potential and the formation of more severely disruptive lesions in the liver and spleen of animals injected with cells containing 20q11.21 compared with i20q and wild type. HLCs with 20q11.21 engrafted more successfully and formed more severely disruptive lesions than wild type cells or cells with i20q. These results reinforce the notion that karyotyping of therapeutic hPSC is required for transplant, and suggest that screening for known common aberrations is necessary. Further work to identify commonly arising genetic aberrations should be performed and routine screening for hPSCs intended for therapeutic use should be used

Preclinical imaging methods for assessing the safety and efficacy of regenerative medicine therapies

Regenerative medicine therapies hold enormous potential for a variety of currently incurable conditions with high unmet clinical need. Most progress in this field to date has been achieved with cell-based regenerative medicine therapies, with over a thousand clinical trials performed up to 2015. However, lack of adequate safety and efficacy data is currently limiting wider uptake of these therapies. To facilitate clinical translation, non-invasive in vivo imaging technologies that enable careful evaluation and characterisation of the administered cells and their effects on host tissues are critically required to evaluate their safety and efficacy in relevant preclinical models. This article reviews the most common imaging technologies available and how they can be applied to regenerative medicine research. We cover details of how each technology works, which cell labels are most appropriate for different applications, and the value of multi-modal imaging approaches to gain a comprehensive understanding of the responses to cell therapy in vivo