22 research outputs found

    A review of dieback - a disorder of the papaw (Carica papaya L.) in Queensland

    Get PDF
    Dieback is a disorder of the pawpaw which causes annual losses in southern sub-tropical Queensland. Tree deaths in plantations may be as high as 100%. This paper collates available information relating to dieback since it was first reported in 1922. It includes origin and production areas, symptoms and occurrence with respect to plant characteristics and cultivars, soils, weather and localities

    Biuret injury on pineapples

    Get PDF
    Biuret added to regular urea foliar sprays induced leaf yellowing and leaf tip dieback and at higher rates reduced plant crop yield by about 6%. The biuret impurity ranged from the equivalent of 0路5 to 0路4% biuret content in urea or 105 to 837 mg biuret per plant. Fruit yield was reduced at the 3 路 0 and 4 路 0% impurity levels but there was no significant difference between 0 路 5, 1路0 and 2 路 0% biuret impurity levels

    Effect of five watering frequencies on growth and yield of various plant parts of container grown Queensland Cayenne pineapples

    Get PDF
    The effect of five watering frequencies (namely, twice weekly, weekly, fortnightly, monthly and 2 monthly) on potted Queensland Cayenne Clone 13 pineapples gave the following responses as frequency was reduced: D leaf length, D leaf weight and thus plant weight reduction within 4 months of planting; a slight reduction in leaf moisture percentage at harvest, at the end of a watering cycle; dry weight reduction of all plant parts (namely, tops, fruit, peduncle, leaves, butt, roots) and thus whole plant dry weight at harvest; a reduction in harvest index (HI); fruit weight was commercially unacceptable for the monthly and 2 monthly waterings even though eye number and thus potential fruit size was unaffected by watering frequency; and leaf area (LA), and dry matter increment (DMI) decreased

    Applied aspects of pineapple flowering

    Full text link

    Archean to Recent aeolian sand systems and their preserved successions: current understanding and future prospects

    Get PDF
    The sedimentary record of aeolian sand systems extends from the Archean to the Quaternary, yet current understanding of aeolian sedimentary processes and product remains limited. Most preserved aeolian successions represent inland sand-sea or dunefield (erg) deposits, whereas coastal systems are primarily known from the Cenozoic. The complexity of aeolian sedimentary processes and facies variability are under-represented and excessively simplified in current facies models, which are not sufficiently refined to reliably account for the complexity inherent in bedform morphology and migratory behaviour, and therefore cannot be used to consistently account for and predict the nature of the preserved sedimentary record in terms of formative processes. Archean and Neoproterozoic aeolian successions remain poorly constrained. Palaeozoic ergs developed and accumulated in relation to the palaeogeographical location of land masses and desert belts. During the Triassic, widespread desert conditions prevailed across much of Europe. During the Jurassic, extensive ergs developed in North America and gave rise to anomalously thick aeolian successions. Cretaceous aeolian successions are widespread in South America, Africa, Asia, and locally in Europe (Spain) and the USA. Several Eocene to Pliocene successions represent the direct precursors to the present-day systems. Quaternary systems include major sand seas (ergs) in low-lattitude and mid-latitude arid regions, Pleistocene carbonate and Holocene鈥揗odern siliciclastic coastal systems. The sedimentary record of most modern aeolian systems remains largely unknown. The majority of palaeoenvironmental reconstructions of aeolian systems envisage transverse dunes, whereas successions representing linear and star dunes remain under-recognized. Research questions that remain to be answered include: (i) what factors control the preservation potential of different types of aeolian bedforms and what are the characteristics of the deposits of different bedform types that can be used for effective reconstruction of original bedform morphology; (ii) what specific set of controlling conditions allow for sustained bedform climb versus episodic sequence accumulation and preservation; (iii) can sophisticated four-dimensional models be developed for complex patterns of spatial and temporal transition between different mechanisms of accumulation and preservation; and (iv) is it reasonable to assume that the deposits of preserved aeolian successions necessarily represent an unbiased record of the conditions that prevailed during episodes of Earth history when large-scale aeolian systems were active, or has the evidence to support the existence of other major desert basins been lost for many periods throughout Earth history
    corecore