Small bowel involvement is a prognostic factor in colorectal carcinomatosis treated with complete cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising treatment for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Our objective was to identify new prognostic factors in patients with PC from colorectal cancer treated with this procedure.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All patients with PC from colorectal cancer treated by HIPEC from January 2000 to December 2007 were prospectively included. The tumor extension was assessed by the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and the residual disease was recorded using the completeness cytoreductive score (CCs). All clinical and treatment data were computed in univariate and multivariable analyses using survival as primary end point.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We carried out 51 complete procedures in 49 consecutive patients. The mean PCI was 10. The allocation of CCs was: CC-0 = 37, CC-1 = 14. The five-year overall and progression-free survival rate were 40% and 20%, respectively. Several prognostic factors for survival were identified by univariate analysis: PCI < 9 (<it>P </it>< 0.001), CC-0 vs. CC-1 (<it>P </it>< 0.01) and involvement of area 4 (<it>P </it>= 0.06), area 5 (<it>P </it>= 0.031), area 7 (<it>P </it>= 0.014), area 8 (<it>P </it>= 0.022), area 10 (<it>P </it>< 0.0001), and area 11 (<it>P </it>= 0.02). Only the involvement of the distal jejunum (area 10) was significant in the multivariable analysis (<it>P </it>= 0.027).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We demonstrated that the involvement of area 10 (distal jejunum of the PCI score) was an independent factor associated with poor prognosis.</p

The Delphi and GRADE methodology used in the PSOGI 2018 consensus statement on Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (PMP) and Peritoneal Mesothelioma (PM) are both rare peritoneal malignancies. Currently, affected patients may be treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy offering long-term survival or even cure in selected patients. However, many issues regarding the optimal treatment strategy are currently under debate. To aid physicians involved in the treatment of these patients in clinical decision making, the PSOGI executive committee proposed to create a consensus statement on PMP and PM. This manuscript describes the methodology of the consensus process. The Delphi technique is a reliable method for attaining consensus on a topic that lacks scientific evidence through multiple voting rounds which feeds back responses to the participants in between rounds. The GRADE system provides a structured framework for presenting and grading the available evidence. Separate questionnaires were created for PMP and PM and sent during two voting rounds to 80 and 38 experts, respectively. A consensus threshold of 51.0% was chosen. After the second round, consensus was reached on 92.9%–100.0% of the questions. The results were presented and discussed in the plenary session at the PSOGI 2018 international meeting in Paris. A third round for the remaining issues is currently in progress. In conclusion, using the Delphi technique and GRADE methodology, consensus was reached in many issues regarding the treatment of PM and PMP amongst an international panel of experts. The main results will be published in the near future

La chimiohyperthermie intrapéritonéale (CHIP) dans les cancers ovariens

RésuméLe cancer de l’ovaire reste, en France, la quatrième cause de décès par cancer chez la femme. Il s’agit d’une maladie souvent diagnostiquée à un stade évolué avec carcinose péritonéale (CP) et dont l’histoire naturelle est marquée par des récidives essentiellement péritonéales et l’acquisition d’un profil de chimiorésistance. Malgré les nombreuses lignes de chimiothérapie systémique et les chirurgies de cytoréduction (CCR), le pronostic de ces récidives reste sombre. Depuis plus de 20ans, plusieurs équipes spécialisées ont développé un traitement combiné des CP, associant une chirurgie de cytoréduction complète à une chimiohyperthermie intrapéritonéale (CHIP). Cette thérapeutique a une large place dans le traitement des CP d’origine non gynécologiques. Le rationnel pour une utilisation de la CHIP dans le traitement des CP d’origine ovarienne est important. D’une part, 3 études prospectives randomisées ont démontré la supériorité de l’utilisation de la chimiothérapie intrapéritonéale (sans hyperthermie) par rapport à la chimiothérapie systémique sur des patientes sélectionnées. D’autre part, des études rétrospectives et cas-témoins évaluant la CHIP font état de données de survie encourageantes, en particulier en cas de récidive chimiorésistante. Néanmoins, la morbidité et la mortalité associées doivent appeler à une sélection rigoureuse des patientes éligibles, et à une prise en charge multidisciplinaire dans des centres spécialisés. L’évaluation de la CHIP doit se faire par le moyen d’études randomisées à différents stades évolutifs : 1re ligne, consolidation, récidives qu’elles soient chimiorésistantes ou chimiosensibles. Plusieurs études européennes sont en cours.SummaryOvarian cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women in France. It is all too often diagnosed at an advanced stage with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), but remains confined to the peritoneal cavity throughout much of its natural history. Because of cellular selection pressure over time, most tumor recurrences eventually develop resistance to systemic platinum. Options for salvage therapy include alternative systemic chemotherapies and further cytoreductive surgery (CRS), but the prognosis remains poor. Over the past two decades, a new therapeutic approach to PC has been developed that combines CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This treatment strategy has already been shown to be effective in non-gynecologic carcinomatosis in numerous reports. There is a strong rationale for the use of HIPEC for PC of ovarian origin. On the one hand, three prospective randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (without hyperthermia) in selected patients compared to systemic chemotherapy. Moreover, retrospective studies and case-control studies of HIPEC have reported encouraging survival data, especially when used to treat chemoresistant recurrence. However, HIPEC has specific morbidity and mortality; this calls for very careful selection of eligible patients by a multidisciplinary team in specialized centers. HIPEC needs to be evaluated by means of randomized trials for ovarian cancer at different developmental stages: as first line therapy, as consolidation, and for chemoresistant recurrence. Several European Phase III studies are currently ongoing

Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: rationale, evidence, and potential indications.

Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) was introduced as a new treatment for patients with peritoneal metastases in November, 2011. Reports of its feasibility, tolerance, and efficacy have encouraged centres worldwide to adopt PIPAC as a novel drug delivery technique. In this Review, we detail the technique and rationale of PIPAC and critically assess its evidence and potential indications. A systematic search was done to identify all relevant literature on PIPAC published between Jan 1, 2011, and Jan 31, 2019. A total of 106 articles or reports on PIPAC were identified, and 45 clinical studies on 1810 PIPAC procedures in 838 patients were included for analysis. Repeated PIPAC delivery was feasible in 64% of patients with few intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications (3% for each in prospective studies). Adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events greater than grade 2) occurred after 12-15% of procedures, and commonly included bowel obstruction, bleeding, and abdominal pain. Repeated PIPAC did not have a negative effect on quality of life. Using PIPAC, an objective clinical response of 62-88% was reported for patients with ovarian cancer (median survival of 11-14 months), 50-91% for gastric cancer (median survival of 8-15 months), 71-86% for colorectal cancer (median survival of 16 months), and 67-75% (median survival of 27 months) for peritoneal mesothelioma. From our findings, PIPAC has been shown to be feasible and safe. Data on objective response and quality of life were encouraging. Therefore, PIPAC can be considered as a treatment option for refractory, isolated peritoneal metastasis of various origins. However, its use in further indications needs to be validated by prospective studies

Indication of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer (Gastripec, Gastrichip)

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is associated with a poor prognosis mostly due to peritoneal metastasis, which will develop in time during the patient's disease history. To prevent and treat peritoneal metastasis, different kinds of treatment regimens have been described. Summary: In this review, we addressed two main topics - prophylaxis and treatment of peritoneal metastasis in GC. Prevention should be directed towards diminishing cancer cell spillage and reducing adherence of cancer cells to the abdominal cavity. Postoperative washing of the abdomen with or without chemotherapy and additional heat are herein discussed. Key Messages: Treatment of existing peritoneal metastasis is effective in patients with limited disease and tumour spread. Cytoreductive surgery including resection of peritoneal metastasis followed directly with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy can increase overall survival and progression-free survival in selected patients. Drugs, duration and time schedules of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are reviewed and presented. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy seems to improve the prognosis of patients with GC and peritoneal metastasis after complete resection of both primary and metastatic tumours

Caractérisation de la résistance en compression de structures composites Carbone-Epoxy haute performance dans le nautisme de compétition

Les matériaux composites Carbone/Epoxy à fibres hautes performancessontdes matériaux de premier choix pour la conception/fabrication de structures utilisées dans des conditions extrêmes. Ils présentent toutefois des résistances moindres en compression, d’autant plus importantes que le module d’élasticité des fibres est élevé. La prédiction analytique de leur rupture en compression est délicate, de par les mécanismes engagés. La caractérisation expérimentale n’est également pas aisée, les tests de compression axiale conduisant généralement à une rupture de la structure par flambement et non par rupture du matériau. Cette dernière constatation soulève la question de savoir si la résistance en compression d’un matériau composite est une propriété du matériau ou une propriété de la structure étudiée. Cette problématique est discutée ici par la réalisation d’une étude comparative entre un modèle et une campagne expérimentale en flexion 4pts réalisée sur différentes structures et configurations matériau