16 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Genomic footprints of activated telomere maintenance mechanisms in cancer
Abstract: Cancers require telomere maintenance mechanisms for unlimited replicative potential. They achieve this through TERT activation or alternative telomere lengthening associated with ATRX or DAXX loss. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, we dissect whole-genome sequencing data of over 2500 matched tumor-control samples from 36 different tumor types aggregated within the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium to characterize the genomic footprints of these mechanisms. While the telomere content of tumors with ATRX or DAXX mutations (ATRX/DAXXtrunc) is increased, tumors with TERT modifications show a moderate decrease of telomere content. One quarter of all tumor samples contain somatic integrations of telomeric sequences into non-telomeric DNA. This fraction is increased to 80% prevalence in ATRX/DAXXtrunc tumors, which carry an aberrant telomere variant repeat (TVR) distribution as another genomic marker. The latter feature includes enrichment or depletion of the previously undescribed singleton TVRs TTCGGG and TTTGGG, respectively. Our systematic analysis provides new insight into the recurrent genomic alterations associated with telomere maintenance mechanisms in cancer
Recommended from our members
Genomic footprints of activated telomere maintenance mechanisms in cancer
Abstract: Cancers require telomere maintenance mechanisms for unlimited replicative potential. They achieve this through TERT activation or alternative telomere lengthening associated with ATRX or DAXX loss. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, we dissect whole-genome sequencing data of over 2500 matched tumor-control samples from 36 different tumor types aggregated within the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium to characterize the genomic footprints of these mechanisms. While the telomere content of tumors with ATRX or DAXX mutations (ATRX/DAXXtrunc) is increased, tumors with TERT modifications show a moderate decrease of telomere content. One quarter of all tumor samples contain somatic integrations of telomeric sequences into non-telomeric DNA. This fraction is increased to 80% prevalence in ATRX/DAXXtrunc tumors, which carry an aberrant telomere variant repeat (TVR) distribution as another genomic marker. The latter feature includes enrichment or depletion of the previously undescribed singleton TVRs TTCGGG and TTTGGG, respectively. Our systematic analysis provides new insight into the recurrent genomic alterations associated with telomere maintenance mechanisms in cancer
Recommended from our members
Genomic footprints of activated telomere maintenance mechanisms in cancer
Abstract: Cancers require telomere maintenance mechanisms for unlimited replicative potential. They achieve this through TERT activation or alternative telomere lengthening associated with ATRX or DAXX loss. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, we dissect whole-genome sequencing data of over 2500 matched tumor-control samples from 36 different tumor types aggregated within the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium to characterize the genomic footprints of these mechanisms. While the telomere content of tumors with ATRX or DAXX mutations (ATRX/DAXXtrunc) is increased, tumors with TERT modifications show a moderate decrease of telomere content. One quarter of all tumor samples contain somatic integrations of telomeric sequences into non-telomeric DNA. This fraction is increased to 80% prevalence in ATRX/DAXXtrunc tumors, which carry an aberrant telomere variant repeat (TVR) distribution as another genomic marker. The latter feature includes enrichment or depletion of the previously undescribed singleton TVRs TTCGGG and TTTGGG, respectively. Our systematic analysis provides new insight into the recurrent genomic alterations associated with telomere maintenance mechanisms in cancer
Correlation of the Electronic and Geometric Structures in Mononuclear Copper(II) Superoxide Complexes
The geometry of mononuclear copperÂ(II)
superoxide complexes has been shown to determine their ground state
where side-on bonding leads to a singlet ground state and end-on complexes
have triplet ground states. In an apparent contrast to this trend,
the recently synthesized (HIPT<sub>3</sub>tren)ÂCu<sup>II</sup>O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup> (<b>1</b>) was proposed
to have an end-on geometry and a singlet ground state. However, reexamination
of <b>1</b> with resonance Raman, magnetic circular dichroism,
and <sup>2</sup>H NMR spectroscopies indicate that <b>1</b> is,
in fact, an end-on superoxide species with a triplet ground state
that results from the single Cu<sup>II</sup>O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup> bonding interaction being weaker than the spin-pairing energy
Peroxo and Superoxo Moieties Bound to Copper Ion: Electron-Transfer Equilibrium with a Small Reorganization Energy
A N<sub>3</sub>S<sub>(thioether)</sub>-Ligated Cu<sup>II</sup>-Superoxo with Enhanced Reactivity
Previous
efforts to synthesize a cupric superoxide complex possessing
a thioether donor have resulted in the formation of an end-on <i>trans</i>-peroxo-dicopperÂ(II) species, [{(Ligand)ÂCu<sup>II</sup>}<sub>2</sub>(μ-1,2-O<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>)]<sup>2+</sup>. Redesign/modification of previous N<sub>3</sub>S tetradentate
ligands has now allowed for the stabilization of the monomeric, superoxide
product possessing a S<sub>(thioether)</sub> ligation, [(<sup>DMA</sup>N<sub>3</sub>S)ÂCu<sup>II</sup>(O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>2</b><sup><b>S</b></sup>), as characterized
by UV–vis and resonance Raman spectroscopies. This complex
mimics the putative Cu<sup>II</sup>(O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>) active species of the copper monooxygenase PHM and exhibits enhanced
reactivity toward both O–H and C–H substrates in comparison
to close analogues [(L)ÂCu<sup>II</sup>(O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup>, where L contains only nitrogen donor atoms. Also,
comparisons of [(L)ÂCu<sup>II/I</sup>]<sup>n+</sup> compound reduction
potentials (L = various N<sub>4</sub> vs <sup>DMA</sup>N<sub>3</sub>S ligands) provide evidence that <sup>DMA</sup>N<sub>3</sub>S is
a weaker donor to copper ion than is found for any N<sub>4</sub> ligand-complex
Peroxo and Superoxo Moieties Bound to Copper Ion: Electron-Transfer Equilibrium with a Small Reorganization Energy
Oxygenation of [Cu<sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)Â(DMF)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>1</b>), a structurally characterized dicopper
Robin–Day class I mixed-valent CuÂ(II)ÂCuÂ(I) complex, with UN-O<sup>–</sup> as a binucleating ligand and where dimethylformamide
(DMF) binds to the CuÂ(II) ion, leads to a superoxo-dicopperÂ(II) species
[Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)Â(O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b>). The
formation kinetics provide that <i>k</i><sub>on</sub> =
9 × 10<sup>–2</sup> M<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> (−80 °C), Δ<i>H</i><sup>‡</sup> = 31.1 kJ mol<sup>–1</sup> and Δ<i>S</i><sup>‡</sup> = −99.4 J K<sup>–1</sup> mol<sup>–1</sup> (from −60 to −90 °C data). Complex <b>2</b> can be reversibly reduced to the peroxide species [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)Â(O<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>3</b>), using varying outer-sphere ferrocene
or ferrocenium redox reagents. A Nernstian analysis could be performed
by utilizing a monodiphenylamine substituted ferrocenium salt to oxidize <b>3</b>, leading to an equilibrium mixture with <i>K</i><sub>et</sub> = 5.3 (−80 °C); a standard reduction potential
for the superoxo–peroxo pair is calculated to be <i>E</i>° = +130 mV vs SCE. A literature survey shows that this value
falls into the range of biologically relevant redox reagents, e.g.,
cytochrome <i>c</i> and an organic solvent solubilized ascorbate
anion. Using mixed-isotope resonance Raman (rRaman) spectroscopic
characterization, accompanied by DFT calculations, it is shown that
the superoxo complex consists of a mixture of μ-1,2- (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup>) and μ-1,1- (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,1</b></sup>) isomers, which are in rapid equilibrium.
The electron transfer process involves only the μ-1,2-superoxo
complex [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)Â(μ-1,2-O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup>) and μ-1,2-peroxo structures [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)Â(O<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>3</b>) having a small bond reorganization
energy of 0.4 eV (λ<sub>in</sub>). A stopped-flow kinetic study
results reveal an outer-sphere electron transfer process with a total
reorganization energy (λ) of 1.1 eV between <b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup> and <b>3</b> calculated in the context
of Marcus theory
Peroxo and Superoxo Moieties Bound to Copper Ion: Electron-Transfer Equilibrium with a Small Reorganization Energy
Oxygenation of [Cu<sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)Â(DMF)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>1</b>), a structurally characterized dicopper
Robin–Day class I mixed-valent CuÂ(II)ÂCuÂ(I) complex, with UN-O<sup>–</sup> as a binucleating ligand and where dimethylformamide
(DMF) binds to the CuÂ(II) ion, leads to a superoxo-dicopperÂ(II) species
[Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)Â(O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b>). The
formation kinetics provide that <i>k</i><sub>on</sub> =
9 × 10<sup>–2</sup> M<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> (−80 °C), Δ<i>H</i><sup>‡</sup> = 31.1 kJ mol<sup>–1</sup> and Δ<i>S</i><sup>‡</sup> = −99.4 J K<sup>–1</sup> mol<sup>–1</sup> (from −60 to −90 °C data). Complex <b>2</b> can be reversibly reduced to the peroxide species [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)Â(O<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>3</b>), using varying outer-sphere ferrocene
or ferrocenium redox reagents. A Nernstian analysis could be performed
by utilizing a monodiphenylamine substituted ferrocenium salt to oxidize <b>3</b>, leading to an equilibrium mixture with <i>K</i><sub>et</sub> = 5.3 (−80 °C); a standard reduction potential
for the superoxo–peroxo pair is calculated to be <i>E</i>° = +130 mV vs SCE. A literature survey shows that this value
falls into the range of biologically relevant redox reagents, e.g.,
cytochrome <i>c</i> and an organic solvent solubilized ascorbate
anion. Using mixed-isotope resonance Raman (rRaman) spectroscopic
characterization, accompanied by DFT calculations, it is shown that
the superoxo complex consists of a mixture of μ-1,2- (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup>) and μ-1,1- (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,1</b></sup>) isomers, which are in rapid equilibrium.
The electron transfer process involves only the μ-1,2-superoxo
complex [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)Â(μ-1,2-O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup>) and μ-1,2-peroxo structures [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)Â(O<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>3</b>) having a small bond reorganization
energy of 0.4 eV (λ<sub>in</sub>). A stopped-flow kinetic study
results reveal an outer-sphere electron transfer process with a total
reorganization energy (λ) of 1.1 eV between <b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup> and <b>3</b> calculated in the context
of Marcus theory