16 research outputs found

    Correlation of the Electronic and Geometric Structures in Mononuclear Copper(II) Superoxide Complexes

    No full text
    The geometry of mononuclear copper­(II) superoxide complexes has been shown to determine their ground state where side-on bonding leads to a singlet ground state and end-on complexes have triplet ground states. In an apparent contrast to this trend, the recently synthesized (HIPT<sub>3</sub>tren)­Cu<sup>II</sup>O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup> (<b>1</b>) was proposed to have an end-on geometry and a singlet ground state. However, reexamination of <b>1</b> with resonance Raman, magnetic circular dichroism, and <sup>2</sup>H NMR spectroscopies indicate that <b>1</b> is, in fact, an end-on superoxide species with a triplet ground state that results from the single Cu<sup>II</sup>O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup> bonding interaction being weaker than the spin-pairing energy

    A N<sub>3</sub>S<sub>(thioether)</sub>-Ligated Cu<sup>II</sup>-Superoxo with Enhanced Reactivity

    No full text
    Previous efforts to synthesize a cupric superoxide complex possessing a thioether donor have resulted in the formation of an end-on <i>trans</i>-peroxo-dicopper­(II) species, [{(Ligand)­Cu<sup>II</sup>}<sub>2</sub>(μ-1,2-O<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>)]<sup>2+</sup>. Redesign/modification of previous N<sub>3</sub>S tetradentate ligands has now allowed for the stabilization of the monomeric, superoxide product possessing a S<sub>(thioether)</sub> ligation, [(<sup>DMA</sup>N<sub>3</sub>S)­Cu<sup>II</sup>(O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>2</b><sup><b>S</b></sup>), as characterized by UV–vis and resonance Raman spectroscopies. This complex mimics the putative Cu<sup>II</sup>(O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>) active species of the copper monooxygenase PHM and exhibits enhanced reactivity toward both O–H and C–H substrates in comparison to close analogues [(L)­Cu<sup>II</sup>(O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup>, where L contains only nitrogen donor atoms. Also, comparisons of [(L)­Cu<sup>II/I</sup>]<sup>n+</sup> compound reduction potentials (L = various N<sub>4</sub> vs <sup>DMA</sup>N<sub>3</sub>S ligands) provide evidence that <sup>DMA</sup>N<sub>3</sub>S is a weaker donor to copper ion than is found for any N<sub>4</sub> ligand-complex

    Peroxo and Superoxo Moieties Bound to Copper Ion: Electron-Transfer Equilibrium with a Small Reorganization Energy

    No full text
    Oxygenation of [Cu<sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)­(DMF)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>1</b>), a structurally characterized dicopper Robin–Day class I mixed-valent Cu­(II)­Cu­(I) complex, with UN-O<sup>–</sup> as a binucleating ligand and where dimethylformamide (DMF) binds to the Cu­(II) ion, leads to a superoxo-dicopper­(II) species [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)­(O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b>). The formation kinetics provide that <i>k</i><sub>on</sub> = 9 × 10<sup>–2</sup> M<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> (−80 °C), Δ<i>H</i><sup>‡</sup> = 31.1 kJ mol<sup>–1</sup> and Δ<i>S</i><sup>‡</sup> = −99.4 J K<sup>–1</sup> mol<sup>–1</sup> (from −60 to −90 °C data). Complex <b>2</b> can be reversibly reduced to the peroxide species [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)­(O<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>3</b>), using varying outer-sphere ferrocene or ferrocenium redox reagents. A Nernstian analysis could be performed by utilizing a monodiphenylamine substituted ferrocenium salt to oxidize <b>3</b>, leading to an equilibrium mixture with <i>K</i><sub>et</sub> = 5.3 (−80 °C); a standard reduction potential for the superoxo–peroxo pair is calculated to be <i>E</i>° = +130 mV vs SCE. A literature survey shows that this value falls into the range of biologically relevant redox reagents, e.g., cytochrome <i>c</i> and an organic solvent solubilized ascorbate anion. Using mixed-isotope resonance Raman (rRaman) spectroscopic characterization, accompanied by DFT calculations, it is shown that the superoxo complex consists of a mixture of μ-1,2- (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup>) and μ-1,1- (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,1</b></sup>) isomers, which are in rapid equilibrium. The electron transfer process involves only the μ-1,2-superoxo complex [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)­(μ-1,2-O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup>) and μ-1,2-peroxo structures [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)­(O<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>3</b>) having a small bond reorganization energy of 0.4 eV (λ<sub>in</sub>). A stopped-flow kinetic study results reveal an outer-sphere electron transfer process with a total reorganization energy (λ) of 1.1 eV between <b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup> and <b>3</b> calculated in the context of Marcus theory

    Peroxo and Superoxo Moieties Bound to Copper Ion: Electron-Transfer Equilibrium with a Small Reorganization Energy

    No full text
    Oxygenation of [Cu<sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)­(DMF)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>1</b>), a structurally characterized dicopper Robin–Day class I mixed-valent Cu­(II)­Cu­(I) complex, with UN-O<sup>–</sup> as a binucleating ligand and where dimethylformamide (DMF) binds to the Cu­(II) ion, leads to a superoxo-dicopper­(II) species [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)­(O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b>). The formation kinetics provide that <i>k</i><sub>on</sub> = 9 × 10<sup>–2</sup> M<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> (−80 °C), Δ<i>H</i><sup>‡</sup> = 31.1 kJ mol<sup>–1</sup> and Δ<i>S</i><sup>‡</sup> = −99.4 J K<sup>–1</sup> mol<sup>–1</sup> (from −60 to −90 °C data). Complex <b>2</b> can be reversibly reduced to the peroxide species [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)­(O<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>3</b>), using varying outer-sphere ferrocene or ferrocenium redox reagents. A Nernstian analysis could be performed by utilizing a monodiphenylamine substituted ferrocenium salt to oxidize <b>3</b>, leading to an equilibrium mixture with <i>K</i><sub>et</sub> = 5.3 (−80 °C); a standard reduction potential for the superoxo–peroxo pair is calculated to be <i>E</i>° = +130 mV vs SCE. A literature survey shows that this value falls into the range of biologically relevant redox reagents, e.g., cytochrome <i>c</i> and an organic solvent solubilized ascorbate anion. Using mixed-isotope resonance Raman (rRaman) spectroscopic characterization, accompanied by DFT calculations, it is shown that the superoxo complex consists of a mixture of μ-1,2- (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup>) and μ-1,1- (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,1</b></sup>) isomers, which are in rapid equilibrium. The electron transfer process involves only the μ-1,2-superoxo complex [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)­(μ-1,2-O<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup>)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup>) and μ-1,2-peroxo structures [Cu<sup>II</sup><sub>2</sub>(UN-O<sup>–</sup>)­(O<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>3</b>) having a small bond reorganization energy of 0.4 eV (λ<sub>in</sub>). A stopped-flow kinetic study results reveal an outer-sphere electron transfer process with a total reorganization energy (λ) of 1.1 eV between <b>2</b><sup><b>1,2</b></sup> and <b>3</b> calculated in the context of Marcus theory
    corecore