Association of Use of Oral Contraceptives With Depressive Symptoms Among Adolescents and Young Women

Importance: Oral contraceptives have been associated with an increased risk of subsequent clinical depression in adolescents. However, the association of oral contraceptive use with concurrent depressive symptoms remains unclear. Objectives: To investigate the association between oral contraceptive use and depressive symptoms and to examine whether this association is affected by age and which specific symptoms are associated with oral contraceptive use. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from the third to sixth wave of the prospective cohort study Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS), conducted from September 1, 2005, to December 31, 2016, among females aged 16 to 25 years who had filled out at least 1 and up to 4 assessments of oral contraceptive use, were used. Data analysis was performed from March 1, 2017, to May 31, 2019. Exposure: Oral contraceptive use at 16, 19, 22, and 25 years of age. Main Outcomes and Measures: Depressive symptoms were assessed by the DSM-IV-oriented affective problems scale of the Youth (aged 16 years) and Adult Self-Report (aged 19, 22, and 25 years). Results: Data from a total of 1010 girls (743-903 girls, depending on the wave) were analyzed (mean [SD] age at the first assessment of oral contraceptive use, 16.3 [0.7]; (mean [SD] age at the final assessment of oral contraceptive use, 25.6 [0.6] years). Oral contraceptive users particularly differed from nonusers at age 16 years, with nonusers having a higher mean (SD) socioeconomic status (0.17 [0.78] vs-0.15 [0.71]) and more often being virgins (424 of 533 [79.5%] vs 74 of 303 [24.4%]). Although all users combined (mean [SD] ages, 16.3 [0.7] to 25.6 [0.6] years) did not show higher depressive symptom scores compared with nonusers, adolescent users (mean [SD] age, 16.5 [0.7] years) reported higher depressive symptom scores compared with their nonusing counterparts (mean [SD] age, 16.1 [0.6] years) (mean [SD] score, 0.40 [0.30] vs 0.33 [0.30]), which persisted after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and ethnicity (β coefficient for interaction with age,-0.021; 95% CI,-0.038 to-0.005; P =.0096). Adolescent contraceptive users particularly reported more crying (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.38-2.58; P <.001), hypersomnia (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.14-2.48; P =.006), and more eating problems (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.13-2.10; P =.009) than nonusers. Conclusions and Relevance: Although oral contraceptive use showed no association with depressive symptoms when all age groups were combined, 16-year-old girls reported higher depressive symptom scores when using oral contraceptives. Monitoring depressive symptoms in adolescents who are using oral contraceptives is important, as the use of oral contraceptives may affect their quality of life and put them at risk for nonadherence

Predictors of irritability symptoms in mildly depressed perimenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: Irritability is a highly burdensome complaint, commonly, but not universally, linked with depressive symptoms. While increased variability in estradiol has been associated with depressive symptoms during perimenopause, more insight is needed into reproductive hormone dynamics and other factors that predispose perimenopausal women to irritable mood. METHODS: Among 50 mildly depressed perimenopausal women (mean (SD) age 48.4 (3.9) years), severity of irritability symptoms (on Symptom Questionnaire Hostility subscale, range 0-23) was assessed weekly for eight weeks, concurrent with potential predictors. Associations between these were examined using generalized estimating equating models. RESULTS: Most women (82.0%) reported having moderate to severe irritability at least once. However, the severity of irritability was highly variable from week-to-week (between-subject mean coefficient of variation [CV] 72.9% and within-subject mean CV 63.7%). In multivariate analyses, less variable serum estradiol levels (standardized beta within-person CV -0.23 95%CI [-0.32, -0.14], p \u3c 0.001), greater depression severity (0.45 [0.35, 0.56], p \u3c 0.001), younger age (-0.23, [-0.28, -0.09], p \u3c 0.001), and more frequent vasomotor symptoms (0.14 [0.05, 0.23], p=0.002) were associated with more irritability. Depression severity explained the largest portion of the variance in irritability, but still not more than 20.3%. Neither crude values, weekly change in, or variability of progesterone or FSH levels were associated with irritability. CONCLUSIONS: Irritability was highly prevalent among mildly depressed perimenopausal women. In contrast to depressive symptoms, decreased rather than increased variability in estradiol levels was associated with more irritability. This highlights that irritable mood can be disentangled from depressive symptoms in perimenopausal women and might be linked with different estradiol dynamics

C-reactive protein haplotypes and dispositional optimism in obese and nonobese elderly subjects

Background Chronic low-grade inflammation, characterized by elevated plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), has been inversely associated with dispositional optimism. Using a Mendelian randomization design, this study explores whether CRP haplotypes that determine CRP plasma levels are also associated with dispositional optimism. Methods In a sample of 1,084 community-dwelling subjects (aged 60–85 years) from three cohort studies (Arnhem Elderly Study, n = 426; Leiden Longevity Study, n = 355; Zutphen Elderly Study, n = 303), six CRP polymorphisms (rs2808628, rs2808630, rs1205, rs1800947, rs1417938, and rs3091244) coding for five common haplotypes were genotyped. The association of CRP haplotypes with CRP plasma levels and dispositional optimism was analyzed using multivariable linear regression models. Subanalyses were stratified by body mass index (BMI =25 kg/m2). Results CRP haplotypes determined CRP plasma levels (adjusted ß = 0.094, p <0.001). In the whole group, no association was found between CRP haplotypes and dispositional optimism scores (adjusted ß = -0.02, p = 0.45). In BMI strata, CRP haplotypes were associated with increasing levels of plasma CRP levels (adjusted ß = 0.112; p = 0.002) and lower dispositional optimism levels (adjusted ß = -0.068; p = 0.03) in the obese group only. Conclusions These results suggest that genetically increased CRP levels are involved in low dispositional optimism, but only in case of obesit

Traumatic experiences, family functioning and mood disorder development in bipolar offspring.

Stress and Psychopatholog

An integrated approach to understand biological stress system dysregulation across depressive and anxiety disorders

Background: Affective disorders involve dysregulation of major biological stress systems (hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA)-axis, immune system, autonomic nervous system (ANS)). Suchdysregulationshave rarely beensimultaneously examined across different stress systems.Methods: In the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (n=2789), we investigated whether current or remitted depressive and/or anxiety disorders (based on the CIDI semi-structured interview), including specific symptom profiles, were associated with separate markers and cumulative indexes of the HPA-axis (cortisol awakening response, evening cortisol, dexamethasone suppression test cortisol), immune system (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha), and ANS (heart rate, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, pre-ejection period).Results: Depressive andanxiety disorderswere significantlyassociated with changes in three biological stress systemsincluding HPA-axis hyperactivity, increased inflammatory activity, and a higher ANS tone, particularly for integrative and cumulative indexes of these stress systems (pFDR <.05) vs. controls. The strongest associations were seen with current disorders andcumulative indexes of the HPA-axis (13=.124, pFDR=.001), the immune system (13 =.057, pFDR=.032), and total cumulative index across stress systems (13=.102, pFDR=.004). Atypical, energy-related depression severity was linked to immune system markers (pFDR<0.001), melancholic depression severity to HPA-axis markers (pFDR=.032), and anxiety arousal severity to both HPA-axis and immune system markers (pFDR<0.05). Findings were partially explained by poorer lifestyle, more chronic diseases, or (especially for ANS-function) antidepressant use. Limitations: Cross-sectional analyses limit examination of temporal associations.Conclusion: Patients withdepressive and anxiety disorders showed consistent dysregulation across biological stress systems, particularly for current episodes.To understand stress system functionality in affective disorders, an integrated approach capturing cumulative stress indices within and across biological stress systems is important.Stress-related psychiatric disorders across the life spa