Current and Future Therapies for β-Thalassaemia: A Review Article

This article will review recent and forthcoming advances in the treatment of thalassaemia. Prognosis of thalassaemia has dramatically improved in the last 50 years with the development of regular and safe blood transfusions and iron chelation. Almost 20 years ago, development of oral chelators, and more recently the improvement in the knowledge and understanding of iron pathophysiology, have led to optimal iron toxicity prevention and treatment. These considerable advancements in medical therapy have transformed transfusion-dependent thalassaemia from a lethal childhood disease to a chronic disease with an open prognosis, even in those individuals over 50 years of age, and with the disease being, in some instances, curable. In the 1980s, the introduction of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation provided the possibility of curing the congenital disease for the first time. More recent developments include an improved understanding of erythropoiesis, which led to the development of new erythroid-stimulating factors effective in thalassaemia, an expansion of donor pull for transplantation, and the approach of the long-term promised gene therapy in clinical practice. Moreover, ongoing trials of gene editing and agents modulating iron metabolism promise new improvements. Today, patients with thalassaemia have several weapons in their therapeutic arsenal and, hopefully, will have much more to come. As usual in medical practice, new advancements provide new challenges for the medical community, and it is the duty of this community to clearly understand the benefits and challenges of any new approach in order to provide the highest clinical benefit to patients

Outcomes of interventions in neonatal sepsis:A systematic review of qualitative research

BackgroundWhile a systematic review exists detailing neonatal sepsis outcomes from clinical trials, there remains an absence of a qualitative systematic review capturing the perspectives of key stakeholders.ObjectivesOur aim is to identify outcomes from qualitative research on any intervention to prevent or improve the outcomes of neonatal sepsis that are important to parents, other family members, healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers as a part of the development of a core outcome set (COS) for neonatal sepsis.Search StrategyA literature search was carried out using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycInfo databases.Selection CriteriaPublications describing qualitative data relating to neonatal sepsis outcomes were included.Data Collection and AnalysisDrawing on the concepts of thematic synthesis, texts related to outcomes were coded and grouped. These outcomes were then mapped to the domain headings of an existing model.Main ResultsOut of 6777 records screened, six studies were included. Overall, 19 outcomes were extracted from the included studies. The most frequently reported outcomes were those in the domains related to parents, healthcare workers and individual organ systemas such as gastrointestinal system. The remaining outcomes were classified under the headings of general outcomes, miscellaneous outcomes, survival, and infection.ConclusionsThe outcomes identified in this review are different from those reported in neonatal sepsis clinical trials, thus highlighting the importance of incorporating qualitative studies into COS development to encapsulate all relevant stakeholders' perspectives.This study reviews outcomes considered important in neonatal sepsis by stakeholders such as parents and healthcare providers, aiding in developing a core outcome set (COS)

Haploientical Transplants with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Role of Comorbidity Index and Pretransplant Positron Emission Tomography

Disease relapse remains an unmet medical need for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). With the aim of identifying patients at high risk for post-transplant relapse, we retrospectively reviewed 41 HL patients who had received haploidentical (haplo) nonmyeloablative (NMA) HCT with high dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) for graft-versus-host (GVHD) prophylaxis. Primary refractory disease, relapse within 6 months from autologous stem cell transplantation, age, pretransplant chemotherapy, HCT comorbidity index (HCT-CI), sex mismatch, tumor burden and pretransplant fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) status, assessed by Deauville score, were analyzed as variables influencing outcomes. All but 1 patient engrafted: median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was 15 (interquartile range, 13 to 23) days and 19 (interquartile range, 12 to 28) days, respectively. Cumulative incidence of severe (grade III to IV) acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and 3-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD was 2.4% and 11.8%, respectively. The 3-year overall (OS), progression free (PFS), and graft relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 75.6%, 43.9%, and 39%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, 3-year OS was significantly worse in patients with HCT-CI 653 (hazard ratio [HR], 5.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 21.8; P\u202f=\u202f.03). Three-year relapse rate, 3-year PFS, and 3-year GRFS were significantly worse in patients with HCT-CI 653 (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.3 to 9.3; P = .01; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.0; P\u202f=\u202f.02; and HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 9.9; P\u202f=\u202f.001, respectively) and in patients with a Deauville score 654 on pretransplant FDG-PET (HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.6-12.4; P\u202f=\u202f.005, HR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 9.7; P\u202f=\u202f.005; and 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.9; P\u202f=\u202f.01, respectively). On univariate analysis, 3-year NRM was significantly worse only in patients with a HCT-CI 653 (HR, 17.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 221.0). Among relapsed or refractory HL patients undergoing haplo NMA HCT with PT-Cy, pretransplant FDG-PET with a Deauville score 654 and HCT-CI 653 identified patients at high risk of relapse. Moreover, an HCT-CI 653 was associated with higher NRM and lower OS

Pre-Engraftment Bloodstream Infections after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Impact of T Cell-Replete Transplantation from a Haploidentical Donor

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are frequent and important infectious complications after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of pre-engraftment BSIs after allogeneic HCT. We retrospectively analyzed data from 553 consecutive patients who underwent HCT between 2010 and 2016. Sixty percent of the patients received T cell-replete unmanipulated haploidentical bone marrow with high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. The BSI rate was 30%; among isolated 213 pathogens, 54% were Gram-positive, 43% were Gram-negative, and 3% were fungi. Independent risk factors for pre-engraftment BSI were transplantation from a haploidentical donor or from cord blood (P <.001), active disease (P =.002), age (P =.04), and myeloproliferative disorders or aplastic anemia (P <.001). Transplantation from a haploidentical donor was an independent risk factor for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative BSI. The 7-day mortality after any BSI was 5% (9 of 178), and in multivariate analysis, BSI etiology was the sole risk factor, with increased mortality in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative BSI (P <.001). Nonrelapse mortality at day +60 after HCT was 3.8% (21 of 553); independent predictors were active disease (P =.045), year of HCT (P =.027), nonengraftment (P =.001), and pre-engraftment BSI (P <.001), with significantly higher risk in BSI due to Gram-negative pathogens compared with Gram-positive pathogens, and BSI due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens compared with susceptible pathogens. Pre-engraftment BSI is a frequent complication after HCT from a haploidentical donor or cord blood. Because the negative impact of pre-engraftment BSI on 60-day nonrelapse mortality was caused mainly by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, particular attention should be given to appropriate empiric therapy and management of patients at high risk for Gram-negative BSI

Early CAR- CD4+ T-lymphocytes recovery following CAR-T cell infusion: A worse outcome in diffuse large B cell lymphoma

CAR(-) CD4(+) T cell lymphopenia is an emerging issue following CAR-T cell therapy. We analyzed the determinants of CD4(+) T cell recovery and a possible association with survival in 31 consecutive patients treated with commercial CAR-T for diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) or mantle cell lymphoma. Circulating immune subpopulations were characterized through multiparametric-flow cytometry. Six-month cumulative incidence of CAR(- )CD4(+) T cell recovery (>= 200 cells/mu L) was 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.65). Among possible determinants of CD4(+) T cell recovery, we recognized infusion of a 4-1BB product (tisagenlecleucel, TSA) in comparison with a CD28 (axicabtagene/brexucabtagene, AXI/BRX) (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]: 5.79 [1.16-24.12] p = 0.016). Higher CD4(+) T cell counts resulted with TSA at month-1, -2 and -3. Moderate-to-severe infections were registered with prolonged CD4(+) T cell lymphopenia. Early, month-1 CD4(+ )T cell recovery was associated with a worse outcome in the DLBCL cohort, upheld in a multivariate regression model for overall survival (HR: 4.46 [95% CI: 1.12-17.71], p = 0.03). We conclude that a faster CAR(- )CD4(+) T cell recovery is associated with TSA as compared to AXI/BRX. Month-1 CAR(-) CD4(+) T cell subset recovery could represent a "red flag" for CAR-T cell therapy failure in DLBCL patients

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for neonatal sepsis (NESCOS)

Neonatal sepsis is a serious public health problem; however, there is substantial heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and reported in research evaluating the effectiveness of the treatments. Therefore, we aim to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatments for neonatal sepsis. Since a systematic review of key outcomes from randomised trials of therapeutic interventions in neonatal sepsis was published recently, we will complement this with a qualitative systematic review of the key outcomes of neonatal sepsis identified by parents, other family members, parent representatives, healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers. We will interpret the outcomes of both studies using a previously established framework. Stakeholders across three different groups i.e., (1) researchers, (2) healthcare providers, and (3) patients’ parents/family members and parent representatives will rate the importance of the outcomes in an online Real-Time Delphi Survey. Afterwards, consensus meetings will be held to agree on the final COS through online discussions with key stakeholders. This COS is expected to minimize outcome heterogeneity in measurements and publications, improve comparability and synthesis, and decrease research waste

Outcomes of interventions in neonatal sepsis: A systematicreview of qualitative research

Background: While a systematic review exists detailing neonatal sepsis outcomes from clinical trials, there remains an absence of a qualitative systematic review capturing the perspectives of key stakeholders.Objectives: Our aim is to identify outcomes from qualitative research on any intervention to prevent or improve the outcomes of neonatal sepsis that are important to parents, other family members, healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchersas a part of the development of a core outcome set (COS) for neonatal sepsis.Search Strategy: A literature search was carried out using MEDLINE, EMBASE,CINAHL, and PsycInfo databases. Selection Criteria: Publications describing qualitative data relating to neonatal sepsis outcomes were included. Data Collection and Analysis: Drawing on the concepts of thematic synthesis, texts related to outcomes were coded and grouped. These outcomes were then mapped to the domain headings of an existing model. Main Results: Out of 6777 records screened, six studies were included. Overall, 19outcomes were extracted from the included studies. The most frequently reported outcomes were those in the domains related to parents, healthcare workers and individual organ system as such as gastrointestinal system. The remaining outcomes were classified under the headings of general outcomes, miscellaneous outcomes, survival, and infection. Conclusions: The outcomes identified in this review are different from those reported in neonatal sepsis clinical trials, thus highlighting the importance of incorporating qualitative studies into COS development to encapsulate all relevant stakeholders' perspectives