13 research outputs found
Automatic segmentation and alignment of uterine shapes from 3D ultrasound data
Background: The uterus is the most important organ in the female reproductive system. Its shape plays a critical role in fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Advances in medical imaging, such as 3D ultrasound, have significantly improved the exploration of the female genital tract, thereby enhancing gynecological healthcare. Despite well-documented data for organs like the liver and heart, large-scale studies on the uterus are lacking. Existing classifications, such as VCUAM and ESHRE/ESGE, provide different definitions for normal uterine shapes but are not based on real-world measurements. Moreover, the lack of comprehensive datasets significantly hinders research in this area. Our research, part of the larger NURSE study, aims to fill this gap by establishing the shape of a normal uterus using real-world 3D vaginal ultrasound scans. This will facilitate research into uterine shape abnormalities associated with infertility and recurrent miscarriages.
Methods: We developed an automated system for the segmentation and alignment of uterine shapes from 3D ultrasound data, which consists of two steps: automatic segmentation of the uteri in 3D ultrasound scans using deep learning techniques, and alignment of the resulting shapes with standard geometrical approaches, enabling the extraction of the normal shape for future analysis. The system was trained and validated on a comprehensive dataset of 3D ultrasound images from multiple medical centers. Its performance was evaluated by comparing the automated results with manual annotations provided by expert clinicians.
Results: The presented approach demonstrated high accuracy in segmenting and aligning uterine shapes from 3D ultrasound data. The segmentation achieved an average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.90. Our method for aligning uterine shapes showed minimal translation and rotation errors compared to traditional methods, with the preliminary average shape exhibiting characteristics consistent with expert findings of a normal uterus.
Conclusion: We have presented an approach to automatically segment and align uterine shapes from 3D ultrasound data. We trained a deep learning nnU-Net model that achieved high accuracy and proposed an alignment method using a combination of standard geometrical techniques. Additionally, we have created a publicly available dataset of 3D transvaginal ultrasound volumes with manual annotations of uterine cavities to support further research and development in this field. The dataset and the trained models are available at https://github.com/UL-FRI-LGM/UterUS
Clinical approach for the classification of congenital uterine malformations Grigoris F. Grimbizis & Rudi Campo & On behalf of the Scientific Committee of the Congenital Uterine Malformations (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ ESGE working group: Stephan Gordts, Sara Brucker, Marco Gergolet, Vasilios Tanos, T.-C. Li, Carlo De Angelis, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo
A more objective, accurate and non-invasive estimation of uterine morphology is nowadays feasible based
on the use of modern imaging techniques. The validity of
the current classification systems in effective categorization
of the female genital malformations has been already challenged. A new clinical approach for the classification of
uterine anomalies is proposed. Deviation from normal uterine anatomy is the basic characteristic used in analogy to the
American Fertility Society classification. The embryological
origin of the anomalies is used as a secondary parameter.
Uterine anomalies are classified into the following classes:
0, normal uterus; I, dysmorphic uterus; II, septate uterus
(absorption defect); III, dysfused uterus (fusion defect); IV,
unilateral formed uterus (formation defect); V, aplastic or
dysplastic uterus (formation defect); VI, for still unclassified
cases. A subdivision of these main classes to further anatomical varieties with clinical significance is also presented.
The new proposal has been designed taking into account the
experience gained from the use of the currently available
classification systems and intending to be as simple as
possible, clear enough and accurate as well as open for
further development. This proposal could be used as a
starting point for a working group of experts in the fiel
The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies
The new ESHRE/ESGE classification system of female genital anomalies is presented, aiming to provide a more suitable classification system for the accurate, clear, correlated with clinical management and simple categorization of female genital anomalies. Congenital malformations of the female genital tract are common miscellaneous deviations from normal anatomy with health and reproductive consequences. Until now, three systems have been proposed for their categorization, but all of them are associated with serious limitations. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) have established a common Working Group, under the name CONUTA (CONgenital UTerine Anomalies), with the goal of developing a new updated classification system. A scientific committee has been appointed to run the project, looking also for consensus within the scientists working in the field. The new system is designed and developed based on: (1) scientific research through critical review of current proposals and preparation of an initial proposal for discussion between the experts, (2) consensus measurement among the experts through the use of the DELPHI procedure and (3) consensus development by the scientific committee, taking into account the results of the DELPHI procedure and the comments of the experts. Almost 90 participants took part in the process of development of the ESHRE/ESGE classification system, contributing with their structured answers and comments. The ESHRE/ESGE classification system is based on anatomy. Anomalies are classified into the following main classes, expressing uterine anatomical deviations deriving from the same embryological origin: U0, normal uterus; U1, dysmorphic uterus; U2, septate uterus; U3, bicorporeal uterus; U4, hemi-uterus; U5, aplastic uterus; U6, for still unclassified cases. Main classes have been divided into sub-classes expressing anatomical varieties with clinical significance. Cervical and vaginal anomalies are classified independently into sub-classes having clinical significance. The ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital anomalies seems to fulfil the expectations and the needs of the experts in the field, but its clinical value needs to be proved in everyday practice. The ESHRE/ESGE classification system of female genital anomalies could be used as a starting point for the development of guidelines for their diagnosis and treatment
Does hysteroscopic metroplasty for septate uterus represent a risk factor for adverse outcome during pregnancy and labor?
Clinical approach for the classification of congenital uterine malformations. PMID: 22611348 [PubMed]
Abstract
A more objective, accurate and non-invasive estimation of uterine morphology is nowadays feasible based on the use of modern imaging techniques. The validity of the current classification systems in effective categorization of the female genital malformations has been already challenged. A new clinical approach for the classification of uterine anomalies is proposed. Deviation from normal uterine anatomy is the basic characteristic used in analogy to the American Fertility Society classification. The embryological origin of the anomalies is used as a secondary parameter. Uterine anomalies are classified into the following classes: 0, normal uterus; I, dysmorphic uterus; II, septate uterus (absorption defect); III, dysfused uterus (fusion defect); IV, unilateral formed uterus (formation defect); V, aplastic or dysplastic uterus (formation defect); VI, for still unclassified cases. A subdivision of these main classes to further anatomical varieties with clinical significance i
Hysteroscopy in recurrent in-vitro fertilisation failure (TROPHY):a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies
What is the recommended diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies according to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) system? The ESHRE/ESGE consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies is presented. Accurate diagnosis of congenital anomalies still remains a clinical challenge due to the drawbacks of the previous classification systems and the non-systematic use of diagnostic methods with varying accuracy, with some of them quite inaccurate. Currently, a wide range of non-invasive diagnostic procedures are available, enriching the opportunity to accurately detect the anatomical status of the female genital tract, as well as a new objective and comprehensive classification system with well-described classes and sub-classes. The ESHRE/ESGE Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) Working Group established an initiative with the goal of developing a consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies. The CONUTA working group and imaging experts in the field have been appointed to run the project. The consensus is developed based on (1) evaluation of the currently available diagnostic methods and, more specifically, of their characteristics with the use of the experts panel consensus method and of their diagnostic accuracy performing a systematic review of evidence and (2) consensus for (a) the definition of where and how to measure uterine wall thickness and (b) the recommendations for the diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies, based on the results of the previous evaluation procedure, with the use of the experts panel consensus method. Uterine wall thickness is defined as the distance between interostial line and external uterine profile at the midcoronal plane of the uterus; alternatively, if a coronal plane is not available, the mean anterior and posterior uterine wall thickness at the longitudinal plane could be used. Gynaecological examination and two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) are recommended for the evaluation of asymptomatic women. Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) is recommended for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies in "symptomatic" patients belonging to high-risk groups for the presence of a female genital anomaly and in any asymptomatic woman suspected to have an anomaly from routine avaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic evaluation are recommended for the sub-group of patients with suspected complex anomalies or in diagnostic dilemmas. Adolescents with symptoms suggestive for the presence of a female genital anomaly should be thoroughly evaluated with 2D US, 3D US, MRI and endoscopy. The various diagnostic methods should be used in a proper way and evaluated by experts to avoid mis-, over- and underdiagnosis. The role of a combined ultrasound examination and outpatient hysteroscopy should be prospectively evaluated. It is a challenge for further research, based on diagnosis, to objectively evaluate the clinical consequences related to various degrees of uterine deformity.status: publishe
The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomaliesâ€
STUDY QUESTION: What is the recommended diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies according to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) system? SUMMARY ANSWER: The ESHRE/ESGE consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies is presented. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Accurate diagnosis of congenital anomalies still remains a clinical challenge because of the drawbacks of the previous classification systems and the non-systematic use of diagnostic methods with varying accuracy, some of them quite inaccurate. Currently, a wide range of non-invasive diagnostic procedures are available enriching the opportunity to accurately detect the anatomical status of the female genital tract, as well as a new objective and comprehensive classification system with well-described classes and sub-classes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The ESHRE/ESGE CONgenital UTerine Anomalies (CONUTA) Working Group established an initiative with the goal of developing a consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies. The CONUTA working group and imaging experts in the field have been appointed to run the project. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The consensus is developed based on: (i) evaluation of the currently available diagnostic methods and, more specifically, of their characteristics with the use of the experts panel consensus method and of their diagnostic accuracy by performing a systematic review of evidence and (ii) consensus for the definition of where and how to measure uterine wall thickness and the recommendations for the diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies, based on the results of the previous evaluation procedure, with the use of the experts panel consensus method. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Uterine wall thickness is defined as the distance between the interostial line and external uterine profile at the midcoronal plane of the uterus; alternatively, if a coronal plane is not available, the mean anterior and posterior uterine wall thickness at the longitudinal plane could be used. Gynecological examination and two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) are recommended for the evaluation of asymptomatic women. Three-dimensional (3D) US is recommended for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies in 'symptomatic' patients belonging to high risk groups for the presence of a female genital anomaly and in any asymptomatic woman suspected to have an anomaly from routine evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic evaluation are recommended for the subgroup of patients with suspected complex anomalies or in diagnostic dilemmas. Adolescents with symptoms suggestive for the presence of a female genital anomaly should be thoroughly evaluated with 2D US, 3D US, MRI and endoscopically. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The various diagnostic methods should always be used in the proper way and evaluated by experts to avoid mis-, over- and underdiagnosis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The role of a combined US examination and outpatient hysteroscopy should be prospectively evaluated. It is a challenge for further research, based on diagnosis, to objectively evaluate the clinical consequences related to various degrees of uterine deformity. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None.status: publishe
The Future of Adhesion Prophylaxis Trials in Abdominal Surgery: An Expert Global Consensus
Postoperative adhesions represent a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. Adhesions can result from infection, ischemia, and foreign body reaction, but commonly develop after any surgical procedure. The morbidity caused by adhesions affects quality of life and, therefore, it is paramount to continue to raise awareness and scientific recognition of the burden of adhesions in healthcare and clinical research. This 2021 Global Expert Consensus Group worked together to produce consented statements to guide future clinical research trials and advise regulatory authorities. It is critical to harmonize the expectations of research, to both develop and bring to market improved anti-adhesion therapies, with the ultimate, shared goal of improved patient outcomes