Macquarie dictionary of English for the Fiji Islands

A Dictionary specifically compiled for the users of English in the Fiji Isalnds. It is unique in that it provides an extensive coverage of the distinct English of Fiji, along with the full range of international English. Definitions are given in clear, simple language, making it ideal for use by the general reader in Fiji, as well as in the education and office environment

Sentinel node localization in primary melanoma : learning curve and results

AB Ninety primary melanoma patients were studied to investigate the importance of adopting the simultaneous use of patent blue dye (PBD) and lymphoscintigraphy plus gamma detection probe to locate the sentinel node (SN). In total 135 SNs in 105 basins were visualized preoperatively under a gamma camera after lymphoscintigraphy. When a SN was identified intraoperatively, its radioactivity level and colour were verified and documented. Two of the SNs seen on lymphoscintigraphy were not found. Using PBD 78.52% of the SNs were identified; 95.5% were identified using the gamma detection probe. Using both methods together 98.5% of the SNs were detected. Twenty-two patients (24.4%) had pathologically positive SNs. The surgical learning curve was assessed for the two techniques. The learning curve associated with the methodology was important in finding the SN when using PBD associated with lymphoscintigraphy, but not when the gamma detection probe was used; we found a statistically significant reduction in the percentage of stained SNs found using PBD in the initial 14 SNs biopsied compared with the subsequent 121 nodes. This is important as not all institutions have access to a gamma probe. The time required to identify each SN was documented and analysed. The duration of the procedure was significantly shorter for stained SNs than for non-stained SNs, which support the use of both PBD and the gamma probe. In conclusion, SN biopsy should be performed by surgeons and nuclear medicine doctors in co-operation, both methods being adopted simultaneously to reduce the percentage of procedure failures

Emergency upper urinary tract decompression: double-J stent or nephrostomy? A European YAU/ESUT/EULIS/BSIR survey among urologists and radiologists

Purpose: To evaluate the decompression of the pelvicalyceal system between urologists and radiologists. Methods: A survey was distributed to urologists and to radiologists comparing double-J stent (DJS), percutaneous nephrostomy (PN) and primary ureteroscopy (URS) for three clinical scenarios (1-febrile hydronephrosis; 2-obstruction and persistent pain; 3-obstruction and anuria) before and after reading literature The survey included perception on radiation dose, cost and quality of life (QoL). Results: Response rate was 40% (366/915). 93% of radiologists believe that DJS offers a better QOL compared to 70.6% of urologists (p = 0.006). 28.4% of urologists consider PN to be more expensive compared to 8.9% of radiologists (p = 0.006). 75% of radiologists believe that radiation exposure is higher with DJS as opposed to 33.9% of urologists. There was not a difference in the decompression preference in the first scenario. After reading the literature, 28.6% of radiologists changed their opinion compared to 5.2% of urologists (p < 0.001). The change favored DJS. In the second scenario, responders preferred equally DJS and they did not change their opinion. In the third scenario, 41% of radiologists chose PN as opposed to 12.6% of urologists (p < 0.001). After reading the literature, 17.9% of radiologists changed their opinion compared to 17.9% of urologists (p < 0.001), in favor of DJS. Although the majority of urologists (63.4%) consistently perform primary URS, only 3, 37 and 21% preferred it for the first, second and third scenarios, respectively. Conclusion: The decision on the type of drainage of a stone-obstructing hydronephrosis should be individualized. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature