The pharmacogenetic and immunomodulatory response to Vitamin D in tuberculosis

Tuberculosis is a global problem, with little change in antibiotic therapy over the last fifty years, but with the emergence of both multi-drug resistant disease and extensive drug resistant disease further treatments are needed to ensure successful management of the disease. Severe vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in patients with tuberculosis and the immunomodulatory mechanisms of elements of the vitamin D axis, including vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and vitamin D receptor (VDR) have been explored in part. Aims This thesis will ascertain the role of polymorphisms in vitamin D axis genes in determining response to vitamin D in tuberculosis patients. Additionally it will aim to determine whether the interaction between underlying genotype, baseline vitamin D level and other elements of the vitamin D axis has the potential to influence clinical outcome and further investigate in vitro effects of vitamin D and elements of the vitamin D axis in influencing the frequency and functionality of monocytes and T cells, both of which are key elements in the immune response to tuberculosis infection. Results Associations between vitamin D baseline and response to supplementation appear to have a genetic association with DBP, VDR and DHCR7 genotypes and varying DBP haplotypes appear to determine the level of DBP at baseline measurement. The effect of vitamin D has an immunomodulatory role in both monocyte response and T regulatory activity, with a clear effect of vitamin D on cytokine response. Conclusion There appears to be a role for vitamin D in the treatment of tuberculosis but further questions are raised regarding the benefits and risks of immune response modulation in an inflammatory/ cytopathogenic condition such as tuberculosis

Tuberculosis incidence correlates with sunshine : an ecological 28-year time series study

Birmingham is the largest UK city after London, and central Birmingham has an annual tuberculosis incidence of 80 per 100,000. We examined seasonality and sunlight as drivers of tuberculosis incidence. Hours of sunshine are seasonal, sunshine exposure is necessary for the production of vitamin D by the body and vitamin D plays a role in the host response to tuberculosis. Methods: We performed an ecological study that examined tuberculosis incidence in Birmingham from Dec 1981 to Nov 2009, using publicly-available data from statutory tuberculosis notifications, and related this to the seasons and hours of sunshine (UK Meteorological Office data) using unmeasured component models. Results: There were 9,739 tuberculosis cases over the study period. There was strong evidence for seasonality, with notifications being 24.1% higher in summer than winter (p<0.001). Winter dips in sunshine correlated with peaks in tuberculosis incidence six months later (4.7% increase in incidence for each 100 hours decrease in sunshine, p<0.001). Discussion and Conclusion: A potential mechanism for these associations includes decreased vitamin D levels with consequent impaired host defence arising from reduced sunshine exposure in winter. This is the longest time series of any published study and our use of statutory notifications means this data is essentially complete. We cannot, however, exclude the possibility that another factor closely correlated with the seasons, other than sunshine, is responsible. Furthermore, exposure to sunlight depends not only on total hours of sunshine but also on multiple individual factors. Our results should therefore be considered hypothesis-generating. Confirmation of a potential causal relationship between winter vitamin D deficiency and summer peaks in tuberculosis incidence would require a randomized-controlled trial of the effect of vitamin D supplementation on future tuberculosis incidence

Process evaluation of a workplace-based health promotion and exercise cluster-randomised trial to increase productivity and reduce neck pain in office workers: A RE-AIM approach

© 2020 The Author(s). Background: This study uses the RE-AIM framework to provide a process evaluation of a workplace-based cluster randomised trial comparing an ergonomic plus exercise intervention to an ergonomic plus health promotion intervention; and to highlight variations across organisations; and consider the implications of the findings for intervention translation. Method: This study applied the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) methodology to examine the interventions' implementation and to explore the extent to which differences between participating organisations contributed to the variations in findings. Qualitative and quantitative data collected from individual participants, research team observations and organisations were interrogated to report on the five RE-AIM domains. Results: Overall reach was 22.7% but varied across organisations (range 9 to 83%). Participants were generally representative of the recruitment pool though more females (n = 452 or 59%) were recruited than were in the pool (49%). Effectiveness measures (health-related productivity loss and neck pain) varied across all organisations, with no clear pattern emerging to indicate the source of the variation. Organisation-level adoption (66%) and staffing level adoption (91%) were high. The interventions were implemented with minimal protocol variations and high staffing consistency, but organisations varied in their provision of resources (e.g. training space, seniority of liaisons). Mean adherence of participants to the EET intervention was 56% during the intervention period, but varied from 41 to 71% across organisations. At 12 months, 15% of participants reported regular EET adherence. Overall mean (SD) adherence to EHP was 56% (29%) across organisations during the intervention period (range 28 to 77%), with 62% of participants reporting regular adherence at 12 months. No organisations continued the interventions after the follow-up period. Conclusion: Although the study protocol was implemented with high consistency and fidelity, variations in four domains (reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation) arose between the 14 participating organisations. These variations may be the source of mixed effectiveness across organisations. Factors known to increase the success of workplace interventions, such as strong management support, a visible commitment to employee wellbeing and participant engagement in intervention design should be considered and adequately measured for future interventions. Trial registration: ACTRN12612001154897; 29 October 2012

Summary of patient characteristics.

*<p>Gender was missing in 19 cases.</p>**<p>Last five years of study only.</p>†<p>In those for whom country of birth is recorded, the five largest non-UK countries were Pakistan (35.8%), India (20.1%), Somalia (13.9%), Bangladesh (4.9%) and Zimbabwe (3.0%).</p>‡<p>18 cases did not have site of infection notified.</p

Seasonal difference in tuberculosis notifications.

<p>Note.– The solid lines show the percentage of excess notifications compared to winter, the interrupted lines are the 95% confidence intervals. <b>A.</b> all notifications; <b>B.</b> pulmonary tuberculosis only; <b>C.</b> extra-pulmonary tuberculosis only; <b>D.</b> Non-UK-born cases only; <b>E.</b> UK-born cases only.</p

Total hours of sunshine and tuberculosis notifications.

<p>Note.– The thin black line above is the tuberculosis incidence per season. The tuberculosis incidence has been decomposed into a trend component (the thick blue line above) and a stochastic seasonal component (the thick red line across the middle of the graph). The thick black line below is the total hours of sunshine per season shifted two seasons (six months) to the right. Thin vertical interrupted lines mark the winter troughs in hours of sunlight. The graph shows that troughs in the total hours of sunshine per season correlate with peaks in the number of tuberculosis notifications two seasons later.</p

Students' participation in collaborative research should be recognised

Letter to the editor