22 research outputs found
Experiences of dental behaviour support techniques: a qualitative systematic review
Background
Little is known about patients' or carers' reported experiences of dental care provided using dental behaviour support (DBS) techniques. Qualitative literature can provide unique insight into these experiences.
Aim
To explore and synthesize qualitative literature related to patient experience of dental behaviour support.
Methods
A PROSPERO-registered systematic review of qualitative articles was undertaken. Studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. Abstracts were screened by two reviewers and data were extracted to summarize the qualitative findings included within them. A thematic summary approach was used to synthesize the qualitative data identified.
Results
Twenty-three studies were included. Studies primarily explored experiences of dental care of children by speaking to their parents (nâ=â16), particularly regarding paediatric dental general anaesthesia (DGA) (nâ=â8). Studies of adults' experiences of DBS (nâ=â7) covered a range of techniques. Nine studies explored broader dental care experiences and did not study specific DBS approaches. A thematic synthesis identified five themes applicable across the studies identified: Trust and the therapeutic alliance supporting effective care delivery; considered information sharing often alleviated anticipatory anxiety; control and autonomy-reduced anxieties; variations in the perceived treatment successes and failures of DBS techniques; and DBS techniques produced longer positive and negative impacts on patients beyond direct care provision.
Conclusion
Qualitative research has been under-utilized in research on DBS techniques. Care experiences of most DBS techniques outside of paediatric DGA are poorly understood. Building trust with patients and enabling autonomy appear to support positive patient-reported experiences of care
A scoping review of interventions and outcome measures in trials of dental behavior support
Background
Dental behavior support (DBS) describes all techniques used by dental professionals to ensure that dental care is safe, effective, and acceptable. There is a need to standardize outcome measures across DBS techniques to reduce heterogeneity, limit selective reporting, promote consistency, and optimize outcomes across DBS research. A comprehensive review of existing measures is a prerequisite to understanding potential outcomes related to the area of interest.
Aim
This review had three aims: first, to identify the outcome measures (OMs) reported in trials of dental behavior support; second, to categorize the component DBS techniques reported within interventions according to emerging agreed terminology; and, third, to map outcome measures to intervention type.
Methods
A scoping review of trials evaluating DBS techniques was undertaken from 2012 to 2022. The review was prospectively registered. Studies were identified through Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO. Study abstracts were screened by two reviewers. Data were extracted by single selector. Outcome measures were sorted according to measurement domains (physiological, behavioral, psychological, and treatment). Responses were assimilated and summed to produce a refined list of distinguishable outcome measures. Intervention types were categorized according to accepted descriptors. Frequencies were presented; associations between outcome domain and DBS type were also reported (Chi-square test of independence).
Results
A total of 344 trials were included in the review from an initial 14,793 titles / title and abstracts screened. Most involved children (n = 215), most were from India (n = 104), involving basic dental care (n = 117). The median number of outcome measures per trial was four (range = 1â12); 1,317 individual outcomes were reported, categorized as: psychological (n = 501, 38.0%); physiological (n = 491, 37.3%), behavioral (n = 123, 9.3%) or, treatment-related (n = 202, 15.3%). DBS interventions were split between 239 (45.7%) pharmacological and 283 (54.1%) non-pharmacological; 96.6% of interventions mapped to accepted descriptors. A significant relationship was noted between the type of intervention and the outcome domain reported.
Conclusion
The findings demonstrate massive variation in outcome measures of DBS interventions that likely lead to unnecessary heterogeneity, selective reporting, and questionable relevance in the literature. A large range of DBS interventions were mapped according to BeSiDe list. There is a need for consensus on a core outcome set across the spectrum of DBS techniques
Putting Guidelines into Practice: Using Co-design to Develop a Complex Intervention Based on NG48 to Enable Care Staff to Provide Daily Oral Care to Older People Living in Care Homes
Objectives: 1) Explore the challenges of providing daily oral care in care homes; 2) Understand oral care practices provided by care home staff; 3) Co-design practical resources supporting care home staff in these activities.
Methods: Three Sheffield care homes were identified via the âENRICH Research Ready Care Home Networkâ and three to six staff per site were recruited as co-design partners. Design researchers led three co-design
workshops exploring care home staffâs experiences of providing daily oral care, including challenges, coping strategies and the role of current guidelines. New resources were prototyped to support the use of guidelines
in practice. The design researchers developed final resources to enable the use of these guidelines in-practice-in-context.
Findings: Care home staff operate under time and resource constraints. The proportion of residents with dementia and other neurodegenerative conditions is rapidly increasing. Care home staff face challenges when
residents adopt ârefusal behavioursâ and balancing daily oral care needs with resident and carer safety becomes complex. Care home staff have developed many coping strategies to navigate ârefusal behavioursâ.
Supporting resources need to âfitâ within the complexities of practice-in-context.
Conclusions: The provision of daily oral care practices in care homes is complex and challenging. The co-design process revealed care home staff have a âlibraryâ of context-specific practical knowledge and coping strategies.
This study offers insights into the process of making guidelines usable for professionals in their contexts of practice, exploring the agenda of implementing evidence-based guidelines