2 research outputs found

    Informal and shared mobility: A bibliometric analysis and researcher network mapping

    Get PDF
    This study was commissioned by the Volvo Research and Educational Foundations to inform the content of the next phase of its Future Urban Transport programme. The aim of the study was to define the subject field (provisionally described by VREF as ‘informal public transport’ and ‘shared mobility’), analyse its bibliometric attributes. The study method involved an analysis of the nomenclature and focus of seminal or consolidating in-field literature to delineate the scope of the study, a systematic search of multiple platforms for in-field English language publications between 2010 and the present, the creation and augmentation of a database for bibliometric analysis, and a survey of leading researchers across eight global regions. The subject field was divided into four main categories of passenger services (flexible transport, informal transport, shared mobility and for-hire transport), which sit between purely private transport and scheduled mass public transport, and can be found in various guises across the Global North and Global South. The timeline of innovation in the field reveals complex and multi-directional global diffusion of service innovations, triggered by changed operating environments and technology disruption. It was found that research in this field is growing fast (doubling every four years). The recent literature is dominated by authors affiliated to universities in Europe, Eastern Asia and Northern America at a regional scale, and to universities in China and the United States at a country scale. Shared mobility (and bike-sharing, car-sharing and ride hailing in particular) has received most attention (62%), followed by for-hire transport (17%), informal transport (11%), and flexible transport (10%). Most publications concerning shared mobility and for-hire transport were produced by lead authors in China (19,3% and 44,1%), followed by the United States (15,0% and 9,9%). Most publications concerning informal transport were produced in South Africa (18,2%) followed by India (9,8%), and concerning flexible transport were produced in the United States (13,1%) followed by Australia (9,6%). There has been extensive international research collaboration, with collaboration between research institutions in China and the United States found to be particularly strong, as was collaboration between China and other East Asian countries. Somewhat paradoxically, while the quantity of collaborations with universities in Africa, Latin America, and Western Asia was relatively small, authors from many countries within these regions are most likely to publish through international collaboration. Citation networks between institutions followed a similar pattern to collaboration networks. Geographical gaps in the literature were found, with heatmaps revealing countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, that received no dedicated research attention. While difficult to quantify, there were also indications of thematic gaps in the literature, or at least disparity between the prevalence of a service type and the number of publications about it. Most notably, compared to their global prevalence, bike-sharing, car-sharing and carpooling were well researched, compared to informal for-hire transport and informal public transport, which received significantly less attention. Given the multi-directional innovation diffusion in the subject field, and the disparity of research capacity and output across regions, it is a field of inquiry that presents rich possibilities for global research collaboration in the next phase of the FUT programme. The survey of leading researchers suggested that: integrating with mass public transport services; serving the needs of vulnerable passengers; regulating service providers; introducing electric vehicles into shared mobility and informal transport fleets; and digitalising aspects of informal transport operations; are priority future research needs

    Systematic significance of bulb morphology of the Southern African members of Oxalis L. (Oxalidaceae)

    Get PDF
    Thesis (MSc)--Stellenbosch University, 2004.ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The systematics of the southern African members of the genus Oxalis L. (Oxalidaceae) is in a state of flux. The bulbs of these species contain potential taxonomically important characters and therefore require detailed study (Salter, 1944). A pilot study assessed the homology of bulbs among southern African Oxalis species (Gebregziabher, 2001), and found that they are all homologous structures. This pilot study also emphasized the range of potentially informative characters from different bulb parts. The aim of the present study was to assess the taxonomic significance of bulb morphology in selected southern African Oxalis species. As far as possible, efforts were made to represent both the taxonomic (Salter, 1944) and palynological diversity (Dreyer, 1996) present in the genus. Detailed bulb morphological studies of 30 species of southern African Oxalis species revealed 41 potentially informative characters. Different bulb-types were identified based on these characters. Bulb-type affinities of taxa included in this study, as well as bulb descriptions from the pilot study (Gebregziabher, 2001), were discussed. Comparison with the current taxonomic classification (Salter, 1944), palynological classification (Dreyer, 1996) and a preliminary phylogeny based on the non-coding plastid trnL-trnF DNA region (Oberlander, 2003), were also made. Bulb morphology conflicted with the current taxonomic classification (Salter, 1944), but showed greater congruence with both the palynological groupings and the trnL-trnF based phylogeny. Based on this study, bulb morphology is found to be taxonomically significant. Further studies on the bulb morphology and anatomy of southern African Oxalis species are merited. Key words: bulb morphology, Oxalis, informative characters, basal plates, fleshy leaves, tunicsAFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die sistematiek van die suider Afrikaanse lede van Oxalis L. (Oxalidaceae) is labiel. Die bolle van hierdie spesies sluit potensieel taksonomies belangrike kenmerke in, en behoort daarom in detail bestudeer te word (Salter, 1944). In Loodsstudie het die homologie van die bolle van die suider Afrikaanse Oxalis spesies ge-evalueer (Gebregziabher, 2001), en gevind dat hulle homoloë strukture is. Resultate van hierdie loodsstudie het ook die reeks van potensieel informatiewe kenmerke van verskillende boldele beklemtoon. Die doel van hierdie studie was om die taksonomiese belang van boImorfologie in geselekteerde suider Afrikaanse Oxalis spesies te ondersoek. Pogings is aangewend om, sover moontlik, beide die taksonomiese (Salter, 1944) en die palinologiese (Dreyer, 1996) diversiteit van die genus in die studie in te sluit. Gedetailleerde bol-morfologiese studies van 30 suider Afrikaanse Oxalis spesies het 41 potensieel informatiewe kenmerke uitgewys. Gebaseer op hierdie kenmerke, is verskillende bol-tipes geïdentifiseer. Verwantskappe tussen die bol-tipes van die spesies ingesluit in hierdie studie, sowel as beskrywings van bolle volgens die loodsstudie (Gebregziabher, 2001), word bespreek. Vergelykings met die huidige taksonomiese klassifikasie (Salter, 1944), palinologiese klassifikasie (Dreyer, 1996) en In voorlopige filogenie gebaseer op die niekoderende plastied trnL-F DNA-streek (Oberlander, 2003) is ook getref. BoImorfologie weerspreek die huidige taksonomiese klassifikasie (Salter, 1944), maar toon groter ooreenstemming met beide die palinologiese groeperings en die trnL-F gebaseerde filogenie. Hierdie studie het bevind dat bolmorfologie van taksonomiese waarde is. Verdere studies op die bolmorfologie en -anatomie van die suider Afrikaanse Oxalis spesies word aanbeveel
    corecore