11 research outputs found

    An unexpected diagnosis of pericardial effusion

    No full text

    A collaborative cardiologist-pharmacist care model to improve hypertension management in patients with or at high risk for cardiovascular disease

    No full text
    Physician led collaborative drug therapy management utilizing clinical pharmacists to aid in the medication management of patients with hypertension has been shown to improve blood pressure control. With recommendations for lower blood pressures in patients with coronary artery disease, a cardiologist-pharmacist collaborative care model may be a novel way to achieve these more rigorous goals of therapy. Objective: The purpose of this project was to evaluate this type of care model in a high cardiac risk patient population. Methods: A retrospective cohort study determined the ability of a cardiologist-pharmacist care model (n=59) to lower blood pressure and achieve blood pressure goals (< 130/80 mmHg) in patients with or at high risk for coronary artery disease compared to usual cardiologist care (n=58) in the same clinical setting. Results: The cardiologist-pharmacist care model showed a higher percentage of patients obtaining their goal blood pressure compared to cardiologist care alone, 49.2% versus 31.0% respectively, p=0.0456. Greater reductions in systolic blood pressure (-22 mmHg versus -12 mmHg, p=0.0077) and pulse pressure (-15 mmHg versus -7 mmHg, p=0.0153) were noted in the cardiologist-pharmacist care model. No differences in diastolic blood pressure were found. There was a shorter duration of clinic follow-up (7.0 versus 13.2 months, p=0.0013) but a higher frequency of clinic visits (10.7 versus 3.45, p<0.0001) in the cardiologistpharmacist care model compared to usual care. The number of antihypertensive agents used did not change over the time period evaluated. Conclusion: This study suggests a team-based approach to hypertensive care using a collaborative cardiologist-pharmacist care model improves blood pressure from baseline in a high cardiac risk patient population and was more likely to obtain more stringent blood pressure goals than usual care.La gesti贸n de la terap茅utica en colaboraci贸n con los m茅dicos utilizando farmac茅uticos cl铆nicos para ayudar con la medicaci贸n de pacientes con hipertensi贸n ha demostrado mejorar el control de la presi贸n arterial. Con las recomendaciones de menores presiones arteriales para los pacientes con enfermedad coronaria, un modelo de colaborativo cardi贸logo-farmac茅utico puede ser un m茅todo novedoso de conseguir resultados terap茅uticos m谩s rigurosos. Objetivo: El prop贸sito de este proyecto fue evaluar este tipo de cuidados en una poblaci贸n de pacientes en alto riesgo cardiovascular. M茅todos: Un estudio de cohorte retrospectiva (n=59) determin贸 la capacidad de que un modelo de cuidados cardi贸logo-farmac茅utico baje la presi贸n arterial y alcance los objetivos de presi贸n arterial (<130 mmHg) en pacientes con o en riesgo de enfermedad coronaria comparado con el cuidados normales de un cardi贸logo (n=58) en el mismo establecimiento cl铆nico. Resultados: El modelo de cuidados cardi贸logofarmac茅utico mostr贸 un mayor porcentaje de pacientes alcanzando su objetivo de presi贸n arterial comparado con el cuidado del cardi贸logo solo, 49,2% vs 31,0%, respectivamente, p=0,0456. Se encontraron mayores reducciones de presi贸n arterial sist贸lica (-22 mmHg vs. -12 mmHg, p=0.0077) y presi贸n de pulso (-15 mmHg vs. -7 mmHg, p=0.0153) en el modelo de cuidados cardi贸logo-farmac茅utico. No se encontraron diferencias en la presi贸n arterial diast贸lica. Hubo menor duraci贸n del seguimiento (7.0 vs. 13.2 meses, p=0.0013) pero mayor frecuencia de visitas a la cl铆nica (10.7 vs. 3.45, p<0.0001) en el modelo colaborativo comparado con el cardi贸logo solo. El n煤mero de antihipertensivos utilizado no cambi贸 durante el periodo evaluado. Conclusi贸n: Este estudio sugiere que un abordaje de los cuidados de la hipertensi贸n en equipo usando un modelo de cuidados colaborativo cardi贸logofarmac茅utico mejora la presi贸n arterial en una poblaci贸n de pacientes en riesgo cardiaco elevado, y alcanz贸 los objetivos de presi贸n arterial m谩s rigurosamente que la atenci贸n normal
    corecore