Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty: 397 cases from the Australian Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent years have seen a rapid increase in the use of resurfacing hip arthroplasty despite the lack of literature on the long-term outcome. In particular, there is little evidence regarding the outcome of revisions of primary resurfacing. The purpose of this analysis was to examine the survivorship of primary resurfacing hip arthroplasties that have been revised. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over 12,000 primary resurfacing hip arthroplasties were recorded by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry between September 1, 1999 and December 31, 2008. During this time, 397 revisions for reasons other than infection were reported for these primary resurfacings and classified as acetabular, femoral, or both acetabular and femoral revisions. The survivorship of the different types of revisions was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using proportional hazard models. Additionally, the outcome of a femoral-only revision was compared to that of primary conventional total hip arthroplasty. RESULTS: Acetabular-only revision had a high risk of re-revision compared to femoral-only and both acetabular and femoral revision (5-year cumulative per cent revision of 20%, 7%, and 5% respectively). Femoral-only revision had a risk of re-revision similar to that of revision of both the acetabular and femoral components. Femoral-only revision had over twice the risk of revision of primary conventional total hip arthroplasty. INTERPRETATION: Revision of a primary resurfacing arthroplasty is associated with a major risk of re-revision. The best outcome is achieved when either the femoral-only or both the acetabular and femoral components are revised. Technically straightforward femoral-only revisions generally have a worse outcome than a primary conventional total hip arthroplasty

Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision: 12,093 replacements from the Australian Joint Registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The outcome of modern resurfacing remains to be determined. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) started collection of data on hip resurfacing at a time when modern resurfacing was started in Australia. The rate of resurfacing has been higher in Australia than in many other countries. As a result, the AOANJRR has one of the largest series of resurfacing procedures. This study was undertaken to determine the results of this series and the risk factors associated with revision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from the AOANJRR were used to analyze the survivorship of 12,093 primary resurfacing hip replacements reported to the Joint Replacement Registry between September 1999 and December 2008. This was compared to the results of primary conventional total hip replacement reported during the same period. The Kaplan-Meier method and proportional hazards models were used to determine risk factors such as age, sex, femoral component size, primary diagnosis, and implant design. RESULTS: Female patients had a higher revision rate than males; however, after adjusting for head size, the revision rates were similar. Prostheses with head sizes of less than 50 mm had a higher revision rate than those with head sizes of 50 mm or more. At 8 years, the cumulative per cent revision of hip resurfacing was 5.3 (4.6-6.2), as compared to 4.0 (3.8-4.2) for total hip replacement. However, in osteoarthritis patients aged less than 55 years with head sizes of 50 mm or more, the 7-year cumulative per cent revision for hip resurfacing was 3.0 (2.2-4.2). Also, hips with dysplasia and some implant designs had an increased risk of revision. INTERPRETATION: Risk factors for revision of resurfacing were older patients, smaller femoral head size, patients with developmental dysplasia, and certain implant designs. These results highlight the importance of patient and prosthesis selection in optimizing the outcome of hip resurfacing

Preoperative planning for redirective, periacetabular osteotomies.

Redirective, periacetabular osteotomies (PAO) represent a group of surgical procedures for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in skeletally mature and immature patients. The ultimate goal of all procedures is to reduce symptoms, improve function and delay or prevent progression of osteoarthritis. During the last two decades, the understanding of the underlying pathomechanisms has continuously evolved. This is mainly attributable to the development of the femoroacetabular impingement concept that has increased the awareness of the underlying three-dimensional complexity associated with DDH. With increasing knowledge about the pathobiomechanics of dysplastic hips, diagnostic tools have improved allowing for sophisticated preoperative analyses of the morphological and pathobiomechanical features, and early recognition of degenerative changes, which may alter the long-term outcome. As redirective, PAO are technically demanding procedures, preoperative planning is crucial to avoid intraoperative obstacles and to sufficiently address the patient-specific deformity. Although conventional radiography has been used for decades, it has not lost its primary role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with DDH. Furthermore, an increasing number of modern imaging techniques exists allowing for assessment of early cartilage degeneration (biochemical magnetic resonance imaging) as well as 3D planning and computer-based virtual treatment simulation of PAO. This article reviews the literature with regard to the current concepts of imaging of DDH, preoperative planning and treatment recommendations for redirective, PAO

Popliteal tendon impingement as a cause of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

IntroductionPopliteal tendon impingement (PTI) is an under-recognized cause of persistent pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the systematic review was to summarize and outline successful strategies in the diagnosis and management of PTI.MethodsA systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed for four databases: MEDLINE (Pubmed), Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database. It was registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42023398723. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the criteria of the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).ResultsA total of 8 studies were included. There were 2 retrospective case series and 6 case reports. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 30 months. Two studies described PTI as an intraoperative phenomenon during TKA with "snapping"; whilst 6 studies described indications and outcomes for arthroscopic tenotomy for PTI following TKA. In making the diagnosis, there was concurrence that the posterolateral pain should be focal and that dynamic ultrasonography and diagnostic injection play an important role. Two specific clinical tests have been described. There was no consistency regarding the need for imaging. There were no reports of instability following popliteal tendon tenotomy or other complications.ConclusionPTI should be suspected as a cause for persistent focal pain at the posterolateral knee following TKA. The diagnosis can be suspected on imaging and should be confirmed with dynamic ultrasonography and an ultrasound-guided diagnostic injection. An arthroscopic complete tenotomy of the tendon can reliably alleviate pain and relies on correct diagnosis. There is no evidence for clinically relevant negative biomechanical consequences following tenotomy.Level of evidenceSystematic Review of Level IV and V studies

Preoperative planning for redirective, periacetabular osteotomies

Redirective, periacetabular osteotomies (PAO) represent a group of surgical procedures for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in skeletally mature and immature patients. The ultimate goal of all procedures is to reduce symptoms, improve function and delay or prevent progression of osteoarthritis. During the last two decades, the understanding of the underlying pathomechanisms has continuously evolved. This is mainly attributable to the development of the femoroacetabular impingement concept that has increased the awareness of the underlying three-dimensional complexity associated with DDH. With increasing knowledge about the pathobiomechanics of dysplastic hips, diagnostic tools have improved allowing for sophisticated preoperative analyses of the morphological and pathobiomechanical features, and early recognition of degenerative changes, which may alter the long-term outcome. As redirective, PAO are technically demanding procedures, preoperative planning is crucial to avoid intraoperative obstacles and to sufficiently address the patient-specific deformity. Although conventional radiography has been used for decades, it has not lost its primary role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with DDH. Furthermore, an increasing number of modern imaging techniques exists allowing for assessment of early cartilage degeneration (biochemical magnetic resonance imaging) as well as 3D planning and computer-based virtual treatment simulation of PAO. This article reviews the literature with regard to the current concepts of imaging of DDH, preoperative planning and treatment recommendations for redirective, PAO

Popliteal tendon impingement as a cause of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Acknowledgements: None.Abstract Introduction Popliteal tendon impingement (PTI) is an under-recognized cause of persistent pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the systematic review was to summarize and outline successful strategies in the diagnosis and management of PTI. Methods A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed for four databases: MEDLINE (Pubmed), Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database. It was registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42023398723. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the criteria of the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). Results A total of 8 studies were included. There were 2 retrospective case series and 6 case reports. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 30 months. Two studies described PTI as an intraoperative phenomenon during TKA with “snapping”; whilst 6 studies described indications and outcomes for arthroscopic tenotomy for PTI following TKA. In making the diagnosis, there was concurrence that the posterolateral pain should be focal and that dynamic ultrasonography and diagnostic injection play an important role. Two specific clinical tests have been described. There was no consistency regarding the need for imaging. There were no reports of instability following popliteal tendon tenotomy or other complications. Conclusion PTI should be suspected as a cause for persistent focal pain at the posterolateral knee following TKA. The diagnosis can be suspected on imaging and should be confirmed with dynamic ultrasonography and an ultrasound-guided diagnostic injection. An arthroscopic complete tenotomy of the tendon can reliably alleviate pain and relies on correct diagnosis. There is no evidence for clinically relevant negative biomechanical consequences following tenotomy. Level of evidence Systematic Review of Level IV and V studies. </jats:sec

Popliteal tendon impingement as a cause of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Abstract Introduction Popliteal tendon impingement (PTI) is an under-recognized cause of persistent pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the systematic review was to summarize and outline successful strategies in the diagnosis and management of PTI. Methods A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed for four databases: MEDLINE (Pubmed), Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database. It was registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42023398723. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the criteria of the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). Results A total of 8 studies were included. There were 2 retrospective case series and 6 case reports. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 30 months. Two studies described PTI as an intraoperative phenomenon during TKA with “snapping”; whilst 6 studies described indications and outcomes for arthroscopic tenotomy for PTI following TKA. In making the diagnosis, there was concurrence that the posterolateral pain should be focal and that dynamic ultrasonography and diagnostic injection play an important role. Two specific clinical tests have been described. There was no consistency regarding the need for imaging. There were no reports of instability following popliteal tendon tenotomy or other complications. Conclusion PTI should be suspected as a cause for persistent focal pain at the posterolateral knee following TKA. The diagnosis can be suspected on imaging and should be confirmed with dynamic ultrasonography and an ultrasound-guided diagnostic injection. An arthroscopic complete tenotomy of the tendon can reliably alleviate pain and relies on correct diagnosis. There is no evidence for clinically relevant negative biomechanical consequences following tenotomy. Level of evidence Systematic Review of Level IV and V studies

Imaging of femoroacetabular impingement-current concepts

Following the recognition of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) as a clinical entity, diagnostic tools have continuously evolved. While the diagnosis of FAI is primarily made based on the patients' history and clinical examination, imaging of FAI is indispensable. Routine diagnostic work-up consists of a set of plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR-arthrography. Recent advances in MRI technology include biochemically sensitive sequences bearing the potential to detect degenerative changes of the hip joint at an early stage prior to their appearance on conventional imaging modalities. Computed tomography may serve as an adjunct. Advantages of CT include superior bone to soft tissue contrast, making CT applicable for image-guiding software tools that allow evaluation of the underlying dynamic mechanisms causing FAI. This article provides a summary of current concepts of imaging in FAI and a review of the literature on recent advances, and their application to clinical practice