Postsorafenib systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: questions and opportunities after the regorafenib trial.

The search for systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma has been characterized by difficulties and failures. Despite recent progresses, many issues are still to be settled. In particular, the development of drugs inhibiting different neoplastic pathways remains a priority for patients intolerant or resistant to antiangiogenic drugs. This task may be daunting, as previous failures extensively demonstrated. We aimed to identify the future perspective of postsorafenib trials analyzing the strengths and the critical points of past and currently undergoing studies, in the light of the most recent evidences in the field. We identified various points (including stratification, biomarkers, end points, radiologic criteria of response, treatment beyond radiologic progression) that should be considered by future trials to reduce the risks of failure

MicroRNA expression profiling with a droplet digital PCR assay enables molecular diagnosis and prognosis of cancers of unknown primary

Metastasis is responsible for the majority of cancer‐related deaths. Particularly, challenging is the management of metastatic cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), whose tissue of origin (TOO) remains undetermined even after extensive investigations and whose therapy is rather unspecific and poorly effective. Molecular approaches to identify the most probable TOO of CUPs can overcome some of these issues. In this study, we applied a predetermined set of 89 microRNAs (miRNAs) to infer the TOO of 53 metastatic cancers of unknown or uncertain origin. The miRNA expression was assessed with droplet digital PCR in 159 samples, including primary tumors from 17 tumor classes (reference set) and metastases of known and unknown origin (test set). We combined two different statistical models for class prediction to obtain the most probable TOOs: the nearest shrunken centroids approach of Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAMR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models. The molecular test was successful for all formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples and provided a TOO identification within 1 week from the biopsy procedure. The most frequently predicted origins were gastrointestinal, pancreas, breast, lung, and bile duct. The assay was applied also to multiple metastases from the same CUP, collected from different metastatic sites: The predictions showed a strong agreement, intrinsically validating our assay. The final CUPs' TOO prediction was compared with the clinicopathological hypothesis of primary site. Moreover, a panel of 13 miRNAs proved to have prognostic value and be associated with overall survival in CUP patients. Our study demonstrated that miRNA expression profiling in CUP samples could be employed as diagnostic and prognostic test. Our molecular analysis can be performed on request, concomitantly with standard diagnostic workup and in association with genetic profiling, to offer valuable indications about the possible primary site, thereby supporting treatment decisions

Real-Life Clinical Data of Cabozantinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction: Cabozantinib has been approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with sorafenib. Cabozantinib is also being tested in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the frontline setting. Real-life clinical data of cabozantinib for HCC are still lacking. Moreover, the prognostic factors for HCC treated with cabozantinib have not been investigated. Methods: We evaluated clinical data and outcome of HCC patients who received cabozantinib in the legal context of named patient use in Italy. Results: Ninety-six patients from 15 centres received cabozantinib. All patients had preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A), mostly with an advanced HCC (77.1%) in a third-line setting (75.0%). The prevalence of performance status (PS) > 0, macrovascular invasion (MVI), extrahepatic spread, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >400 ng/mL was 50.0, 30.2, 67.7, and 44.8%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 12.1 (95% confidence interval 9.4–14.8) and 5.1 (3.3–6.9) months, respectively. Most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (67.7%), diarrhoea (54.2%), anorexia (45.8%), HFSR (43.8%), weight loss (24.0%), and hypertension (24.0%). Most common treatment-related Grade 3–4 AEs were fatigue (6.3%), HFSR (6.3%), and increased aminotransferases (6.3%). MVI, ECOG-PS > 0, and AFP >400 ng/mL predicted a worse OS. Discontinuation for intolerance and no new extrahepatic lesions at the progression were associated with better outcomes. Conclusions: In a real-life Western scenario (mostly in a third-line setting), cabozantinib efficacy and safety data were comparable with those reported in its registration trial. Data regarding the prognostic factors might help in patient selection and design of clinical trials

Oxaliplatin in pre-treated patients: Maybe not the match point?

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease and is projected to become one of the major causes of cancer-related death in western countries. Intensification of first-line treatment with the use of polychemotherapeutic regimens (FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel) has significantly improved the overall survival and progression-free survival; as a consequence, the number of patients alive and fit for second-line treatment is increasing. However, the selection of the best second-line treatment is difficult and large phase III trials are urgently needed. After the positive results of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil combination in the CONKO-003 trial, two recent phase III studies, PANCREOX and NAPOLI-1, investigating the use of second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine-based first-line, showed controversial results. Giving the practice-changing advances rapidly growing in last years and the multiple therapeutic strategies that are becoming available for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, the real issue seems to be the optimal sequence of treatment much more than second-line treatment

Biological Hallmarks and New Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of PDAC

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest solid tumors and is estimated to become a leading cause of cancer-related death in coming years. Despite advances in surgical approaches and the emergence of new chemotherapy options, its poor prognosis has not improved in the last decades. The current treatment for PDAC is the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy agents. However, PDAC shows resistance to many antineoplastic therapies with rapid progression. Although PDAC represents a heterogeneous disease, there are common alterations including oncogenic mutations of KRAS, and the frequent inactivation of different cell cycle regulators including the CDKN2A tumor suppressor gene. An emerging field of investigation focuses on inhibiting the function of proteins that suppress the immune checkpoint PD-1/PD-L1, with activation of the endogenous immune response. To date, all conventional immunotherapies have been less successful in patients with PDAC compared to other tumors. The need for new targets, associated with an extended molecular analysis of tumor samples could give new pharmacological options for the treatment of PDAC. It is, therefore, important to push for a broader molecular approach in PDAC research. Here, we provide a selected summary of emerging strategy options for targeting PDAC using CDK4/6 inhibitors, RAS inhibitors, and new drug combinations with immune checkpoint agents

Oxaliplatin in pre-treated patients: Maybe not the match point?

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease and is projected to become one of the major causes of cancer-related death in western countries. Intensification of first-line treatment with the use of polychemotherapeutic regimens (FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel) has significantly improved the overall survival and progression-free survival; as a consequence, the number of patients alive and fit for second-line treatment is increasing. However, the selection of the best second-line treatment is difficult and large phase III trials are urgently needed. After the positive results of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil combination in the CONKO-003 trial, two recent phase III studies, PANCREOX and NAPOLI-1, investigating the use of second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine-based first-line, showed controversial results. Giving the practice-changing advances rapidly growing in last years and the multiple therapeutic strategies that are becoming available for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, the real issue seems to be the optimal sequence of treatment much more than second-line treatment

Epigenetic and epitranscriptomic changes in colorectal cancer: diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment implications

A cancer cell is the final product of a complex mixture of genetic, epigenetic and epitranscriptomic alterations, whose final interplay contribute to cancer onset and progression. This is specifically true for colorectal cancer, a tumor with a strong epigenetic component, which acts earlier than any other genetic alteration in promoting cancer cell malignant transformation. The pattern of progressive, and usually subtype-specific, DNA and histone modifications that occur in colorectal cancer has been extensively studied in the last decade, providing plenty of data to explore. For this tumor, it became recently evident that also RNA modifications play a relevant role in the activation of oncogenes or repression of tumor suppressor genes. In this review we provide a brief overview of all epigenetic and epitranscriptomic changes that have been found associated to colorectal cancer till now. We explore the impact of these alterations in cancer prognosis and response to treatment and discuss their potential use as cancer biomarkers