Transfer to the Local Stroke Center vs Direct Transfer to Endovascular Center of Acute Stroke Patients with Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion in the Catalan Territory (RACECAT): study protocol of a cluster randomized within a cohort trial

Rationale: Optimal pre-hospital delivery pathways for acute stroke patients suspected to harbor a large vessel occlusion (LVO) have not been assessed in randomized trials. Aim: To establish whether stroke subjects with RACE scale based suspicion of LVO evaluated by Emergency Medical Services in the field, have higher rates of favorable outcome when transferred directly to an Endovascular Center (EVT-SC), as compared to the standard transfer to the closest Local Stroke Center (Local-SC).Design: Multicenter, superiority, cluster randomized within a cohort trial with blinded endpoint assessment. Procedure: Eligible patients must be 18 or older, have acute stroke symptoms and not have an immediate life threatening condition requiring emergent medical intervention. They must be suspected to have intracranial LVO based on a pre-hospital RACE scale of ≥5, be located in geographical areas where the default health authority assigned referral stroke center is a non-thrombectomy capable hospital, and estimated arrival at a thrombectomy capable stroke hospital in less than 7 hours from time last seen well. Cluster randomization is performed according to a pre-established temporal sequence (temporal cluster design) with 3 strata: day/night, distance to the EVT-SC and week/week-end day. Study outcome: The primary endpoint is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. The primary safety outcome is mortality at 90 days. Analysis: The primary endpoint based on the modified intention-to-treat population is the distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores (mRS) at 90 days analyzed under a sequential triangular design. The maximum sample size is 1754 patients, with two planned interim analyses when 701 (40%) and 1227 patients have completed follow-up. Hypothesized common odds ratio is 1.35.The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The trial is sponsored by the nonprofit foundation Fundació Privada Ictus Malaltia Vascular, beneficiary of an unrestricted grant by Medtronic. Trial sponsor: Fundació Privada Ictus Malaltia Vascular. Elisabeth Ortínez ([email protected]). Study sponsor and funders do not participate in the study design, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report or the decision to submit results for publication

Rehabilitation profiles of older adult stroke survivors admitted to intermediate care units: A multi-centre study

Background: Stroke is a major cause of disability in older adults, but the evidence around post-acute treatment is limited and heterogeneous. We aimed to identify profiles of older adult stroke survivors admitted to intermediate care geriatric rehabilitation units. Methods: We performed a cohort study, enrolling stroke survivors aged 65 years or older, admitted to 9 intermediate care units in Catalonia-Spain. To identify potential profiles, we included age, caregiver presence, comorbidity, pre-stroke and post-stroke disability, cognitive impairment and stroke severity in a cluster analysis. We also proposed a practical decision tree for patient’s classification in clinical practice. We analyzed differences between profiles in functional improvement (Barthel index), relative functional gain (Montebello index), length of hospital stay (LOS), rehabilitation efficiency (functional improvement by LOS), and new institutionalization using multivariable regression models (for continuous and dichotomous outcomes). Results: Among 384 patients (79.1±7.9 years, 50.8% women), we identified 3 complexity profiles: a) Lower Complexity with Caregiver (LCC), b) Moderate Complexity without Caregiver (MCN), and c) Higher Complexity with Caregiver (HCC). The decision tree showed high agreement with cluster analysis (96.6%). Using either linear (continuous outcomes) or logistic regression, both LCC and MCN, compared to HCC, showed statistically significant higher chances of functional improvement (OR = 4.68, 95%CI = 2.54–8.63 and OR = 3.0, 95%CI = 1.52–5.87, respectively, for Barthel index improvement =20), relative functional gain (OR = 4.41, 95%CI = 1.81–10.75 and OR = 3.45, 95%CI = 1.31–9.04, respectively, for top Vs lower tertiles), and rehabilitation efficiency (OR = 7.88, 95%CI = 3.65–17.03 and OR = 3.87, 95%CI = 1.69–8.89, respectively, for top Vs lower tertiles). In relation to LOS, MCN cluster had lower chance of shorter LOS than LCC (OR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.23–0.75) and HCC (OR = 0.37, 95%CI = 0.19–0.73), for LOS lower Vs higher tertiles. Conclusion: Our data suggest that post-stroke rehabilitation profiles could be identified using routine assessment tools and showed differential recovery. If confirmed, these findings might help to develop tailored interventions to optimize recovery of older stroke patients.Peer Reviewe

Three essays on political economy, trade and international economic integration

SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:DXN035296 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo

Mechanical thrombectomy in and outside the REVASCAT trial insights from a concurrent population-based Stroke registry

Background and Purpose-Recent trials have shown the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) over medical therapy alone in certain stroke patients with proximal arterial occlusion. Using data from the Randomized Trial of Revascularization With Solitaire FR Device Versus Best Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Stroke due to Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Presenting Within 8-Hours of Symptom Onset (REVASCAT) and a parallel reperfusion treatment registry, we sought to assess the utilization of EVT in a defined patient population, comparing the outcomes of patients treated in and outside the REVASCAT trial. Methods-SONIIA [Sistema Online d'Informacio de l'Ictus Agut], a population-based, government-mandated, prospective registry of reperfusion therapies for stroke encompassing the entire population of Catalonia, was used as data source. The registry documents 5 key inclusion criteria of the REVASCAT trial: age, stroke severity, time to treatment, baseline functional status, and occlusion site. We compared procedural, safety, and functional outcomes in patients treated inside and outside the trial. Results-From November 2012 to December 2014, out of 17596 ischemic stroke patients in Catalonia (population 7.5 million), 2576 patients received reperfusion therapies (17/100000 inhabitants-year), mainly intravenous thrombolysis only (2036). From the remaining 540 treated with EVT, 103 patients (out of 206 randomized) were treated within REVASCAT and 437 outside the trial. Of these, 399 did not fulfill some of the study criteria, and 38 were trial candidates (8 treated at REVASCAT centers and 30 at 2 non-REVASCAT centers). The majority of procedural, safety, and functional outcomes were similar in patients treated with EVT within and outside REVASCAT. Conclusions-REVASCAT enrolled nearly all eligible patients representing one third of all patients treated with EVT. Patients treated with EVT within and outside REVASCAT had similar outcomes, reinforcing the therapeutic value of EVT.Peer Reviewe

Transfer to the Local Stroke Center versus Direct Transfer to Endovascular Center of Acute Stroke Patients with Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion in the Catalan Territory (RACECAT): study protocol of a cluster randomized within a cohort trial

Rationale: Optimal pre-hospital delivery pathways for acute stroke patients suspected to harbor a large vessel occlusion (LVO) have not been assessed in randomized trials. Aim: To establish whether stroke subjects with RACE scale based suspicion of LVO evaluated by Emergency Medical Services in the field, have higher rates of favorable outcome when transferred directly to an Endovascular Center (EVT-SC), as compared to the standard transfer to the closest Local Stroke Center (Local-SC). Design: Multicenter, superiority, cluster randomized within a cohort trial with blinded endpoint assessment. Procedure: Eligible patients must be 18 or older, have acute stroke symptoms and not have an immediate life threatening condition requiring emergent medical intervention. They must be suspected to have intracranial LVO based on a pre-hospital RACE scale of =5, be located in geographical areas where the default health authority assigned referral stroke center is a non-thrombectomy capable hospital, and estimated arrival at a thrombectomy capable stroke hospital in less than 7 hours from time last seen well. Cluster randomization is performed according to a pre-established temporal sequence (temporal cluster design) with 3 strata: day/night, distance to the EVT-SC and week/week-end day. Study outcome: The primary endpoint is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. The primary safety outcome is mortality at 90 days. Analysis: The primary endpoint based on the modified intention-to-treat population is the distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores (mRS) at 90 days analyzed under a sequential triangular design. The maximum sample size is 1754 patients, with two planned interim analyses when 701 (40%) and 1227 patients have completed follow-up. Hypothesized common odds ratio is 1.35.Peer Reviewe