4 research outputs found

    Post-fire Management Effects on Sediment (Dis)Connectivity in Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems: Channel and Catchment Response

    Get PDF
    [Abstract] Forest fires and post-fire practices influence sediment connectivity (SC). In this study, we use the ‘aggregated index of connectivity’ (AIC) to assess SC in five Mediterranean catchments (198–1090 ha) affected by a wildfire in 2012 in south-eastern Spain. Two temporal scenarios were considered, immediately after the fire and before post-fire management, and 2 years after the fire including all practices (hillslope barriers, check-dams, afforestation, salvage logging and skid trails). One LiDAR (light detection and ranging)-derived digital elevation model (DEM, 2 m × 2 m resolution) was generated, per scenario. The five catchment outlets were established as the computation target (AICоᴜᴛ), and structural and functional SC were calculated. Index outputs were normalized to make the results of the non-nested catchments comparable (AICɴ₋оᴜᴛ). The output analysis includes the SC distribution along the catchments and at local scale (929 sub-catchments, 677 in the burned area), the hillslope and channel measures' effect on SC, and a sedimentological analysis using observed area-specific sediment yield (SSY) at 10 new (built after post-fire practices) concrete check-dams located in the catchments (SSY = 1.94 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹; σ = 1.22). The catchments with more circular shapes and steeper slopes were those with higher AICɴ₋оᴜᴛ. The structural SC maps – removing the rainfall erosivity influence – allowed evaluating the actual role played by the post-fire practices that reduced SC (x̅ = − 1.19%; σ = 0.41); while functional SC was linked to the actual change of SC (x̅ = + 5.32%; σ = 0.62). Hillslope treatments resulted in significant changes on AICɴ₋оᴜᴛ at sub-catchment scale with certain disconnectivity. A good and positive correlation was found between the SSY and the changes of AICɴ₋оᴜᴛ. However, the coarse DEM resolution explained the lack of effect of the rock check-dams – located on the secondary channels – on AICɴ₋оᴜᴛ. AICɴ₋оᴜᴛ proved to be a useful tool for decision making in post-fire restoration, but an optimal input data is still necessary to refine calculations.European Cooperation in Science and Technology; CA18135Gobierno de Castilla-la Mancha; Sbply/16/180501/ 000109This study was supported by funds provided to the VIS4FIRE Spanish R&D project (RTA2017-00042-C05-00) co-funded by the “Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria” (INIA) and FEDER programme. This study was done in the frame of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action CA18135 ‘FIRElinks’ (Fire in the Earth System:Science & Society). J. González-Romero holds a scholarship (Sbply/16/180501/000109) from the Regional Government of Castilla-La Mancha/European Social Fund (ESF, EU)

    Post-fire Management Effects on Hillslope-Stream Sediment Connectivity in a Mediterranean Forest Ecosystem

    Get PDF
    [Abstract] Forest fires intensify sediment transport and aggravate local and off-site consequences of soil erosion. This study evaluates the influence of post-fire measures on structural and functional sediment connectivity (SC) in five fire-affected Mediterranean catchments, which include 929 sub-catchments, by using the “aggregated index of connectivity” (AIC) at two temporal scenarios: I) immediately after the fire and before implementing post-fire practices (‘Pre-man’), and II) two years after the fire (‘Post-man’). The latter includes all the emergency stabilization practices, that are hillslope barriers, check-dams and afforestation. The stream system was set as the target of the computation (STR), to be representative of intense rainfall-runoff events with effective sediment delivery outside the catchments. Output normalization (AICN) allows comparing the results of the five basins between them. The sedimentological analysis is based on specific sediment yield (SSY) –measured at the check-dams installed after the fire –, and this data is used for output evaluation. Stream density and slope variables were the most influential factors on AICN-STR results at the sub-catchment scale. Post-fire hillslope treatments (barriers when built in high densities and afforestation) significantly reduced AICN-STR in comparison with untreated areas in both structural and functional approaches. Despite the presence of hillslope treatments, the higher erosive rainfall conditions resulted in higher AICN-STR values in the Post-man scenario (functional approach). A positive and good correlation was found between the measured SSY and the AICN-STR changes due to the post-fire practices and vegetation recovery, showing the good correspondence of the computation results and the real sediment dynamics of the studied catchments. Overall, AICN demonstrated to be a useful and versatile tool for post-fire management, which needs further research to optimize its applicability.The authors thank the Regional Government of Castilla-La Mancha (Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha) for supporting the study and providing information about the undertaken measures in the burned area. This study was supported by funds provided to the VIS4FIRE Spanish R&D project (RTA 2017-00042-C05-00) co-funded by the “Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria” (INIA) and FEDER programme. This study was done in the frame of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action CA18135 ‘FIRElinks’ (Fire in the Earth System: Science & Society). J. González-Romero holds a postdoctoral contract supported by the European Social Fund (ESF, EU). The authors declare no conflict of interest. E. Peña holds a scholarship (2020-PREUCLM-16032) from the UCLM and the European Social Fund (FSE). Pedro Antonio Plaza Álvarez holds a predoctoral fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (FPU16/03296)Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha; 2020-PREUCLM-1603

    Optimización de cimentaciones directas de medianería y esquina mediante modelos de elementos finitos

    Full text link
    Existe un amplio catálogo de posibles soluciones para resolver la problemática de las zapatas de medianería así como, por extensión, las zapatas de esquina como caso particular de las anteriores. De ellas, las más habitualmente empleadas en estructuras de edificación son, por un lado, la utilización de una viga centradora que conecta la zapata de medianería con la zapata del pilar interior más próximo y, por otro, la colaboración de la viga de la primera planta trabajando como tirante. En la primera solución planteada, el equilibrio de la zapata de medianería y el centrado de la respuesta del terreno se consigue gracias a la colaboración del pilar interior con su cimentación y al trabajo a flexión de la viga centradora. La modelización clásica considera que se logra un centrado total de la reacción del terreno, con distribución uniforme de las tensiones de contacto bajo ambas zapatas. Este planteamiento presupone, por tanto, que la viga centradora logra evitar cualquier giro de la zapata de medianería y que el pilar puede, por ello, considerarse perfectamente empotrado en la cimentación. En este primer modelo, el protagonismo fundamental recae en la viga centradora, cuyo trabajo a flexión conduce frecuentemente a unas escuadrías y a unas cuantías de armado considerables. La segunda solución, plantea la colaboración de la viga de la primera planta, trabajando como tirante. De nuevo, los métodos convencionales suponen un éxito total en el mecanismo estabilizador del tirante, que logra evitar cualquier giro de la zapata de medianería, dando lugar a una distribución de tensiones también uniforme. Los modelos convencionales existentes para el cálculo de este tipo de cimentaciones presentan, por tanto, una serie de simplificaciones que permiten el cálculo de las mismas, por medios manuales, en un tiempo razonable, pero presentan el inconveniente de su posible alejamiento del comportamiento real de la cimentación, con las consecuencias negativas que ello puede suponer en el dimensionamiento de estos elementos estructurales. La presente tesis doctoral desarrolla un contraste de los modelos convencionales de cálculo de cimentaciones de medianería y esquina, mediante un análisis alternativo con modelos de elementos finitos, con el objetivo de poner de manifiesto las diferencias entre los resultados obtenidos con ambos tipos de modelización, analizar cuáles son las variables que más influyen en el comportamiento real de este tipo de cimentaciones y proponer un nuevo modelo de cálculo, de tipo convencional, más ajustado a la realidad. El proceso de investigación se desarrolla mediante una etapa experimental virtual que utiliza como modelo un pórtico tipo de edificación, ortogonal, de hormigón armado, con dos vanos y número variable de plantas. Tras identificar el posible giro de la cimentación como elemento clave en el comportamiento de las zapatas de medianería y de esquina, se adoptan como variables de estudio aquellas que mayor influencia puedan tener sobre el citado giro de las zapatas y sobre la rigidez del conjunto del elemento estructural. Así, se han estudiado luces de 3 m a 7 m, diferente número de plantas desde baja+1 hasta baja+4, resistencias del terreno desde 100 kN/m2 hasta 300 kN/m2, relaciones de forma de la zapata de medianería de 1,5 : 1 y 2 : 1, aumento y reducción de la cuantía de armado de la viga centradora y variación del canto de la viga centradora desde el mínimo canto compatible con el anclaje de la armadura de los pilares hasta un incremento del 75% respecto del citado canto mínimo. El conjunto de pórticos generados al aplicar las variables indicadas, se ha calculado tanto por métodos convencionales como por el método de los elementos finitos. Los resultados obtenidos ponen de manifiesto importantes discrepancias entre ambos métodos que conducen a importantes diferencias en el dimensionamiento de este tipo de cimentaciones. El empleo de los métodos tradicionales da lugar, por un lado, a un sobredimensionamiento de la armadura de la viga centradora y, por otro, a un infradimensionamiento, tanto del canto de la viga centradora, como del tamaño de la zapata de medianería y del armado de la viga de la primera planta. Finalizado el análisis y discusión de resultados, la tesis propone un nuevo método alternativo, de carácter convencional y, por tanto, aplicable a un cálculo manual en un tiempo razonable, que permite obtener los parámetros clave que regulan el comportamiento de las zapatas de medianería y esquina, conduciendo a un dimensionamiento más ajustado a las necesidades reales de este tipo de cimentación. There is a wide catalogue of possible solutions to solve the problem of party shoes and, by extension, corner shoes as a special case of the above. From all of them, the most commonly used in building structures are, on one hand, the use of a centering beam that connects the party shoe with the shoe of the nearest interior pillar and, on the other hand, the collaboration of the beam of the first floor working as a tie rod. In the first proposed solution, the balance of the party shoe and the centering of the ground response is achieved thanks to the collaboration of the interior pillar with his foundation along with the bending work of the centering beam. Classical modeling considers that a whole centering of the ground reaction is achieved, with uniform contact stress distribution under both shoes. This approach to the issue presupposes that the centering beam manages to avoid any rotation of the party shoe, so the pillar can be considered perfectly embedded in the foundation. In this first model, the leading role lies in the centering beam, whose bending work usually leads to important section sizes and high amounts of reinforced. The second solution, consideres the collaboration of the beam of the first floor, working as tie rod. Again, conventional methods involve a total success in the stabilizing mechanism of the tie rod, that manages to avoid any rotation of the party shoe, resulting in a stress distribution also uniform. Existing conventional models for calculating such foundations show, therefore, a series of simplifications which allow calculation of the same, by manual means, in a reasonable time, but have the disadvantage of the possible distance from the real behavior of the foundation, with the negative consequences this could bring in the dimensioning of these structural elements. The present thesis develops a contrast of conventional models of calculation of party and corner foundations by an alternative analysis with finite element models with the aim of bring to light the differences between the results obtained with both types of modeling, analysis which are the variables that influence the real behavior of this type of foundations and propose a new calculation model, conventional type, more adjusted to reality. The research process is developed through a virtual experimental stage using as a model a typical building frame, orthogonal, made of reinforced concrete, with two openings and variable number of floors. After identifying the possible spin of the foundation as the key element in the behavior of the party and corner shoes, it has been adopted as study variables, those that may have greater influence on the spin of the shoes and on the rigidity of the whole structural element. So, it have been studied lights from 3 m to 7 m, different number of floors from lower floor + 1 to lower floor + 4, máximum ground stresses from 100 kN/m2 300 kN/m2, shape relationships of party shoe 1,5:1 and 2:1, increase and decrease of the amount of reinforced of the centering beam and variation of the height of the centering beam from the minimum compatible with the anchoring of the reinforcement of pillars to an increase of 75% from the minimum quoted height. The set of frames generated by applying the indicated variables, is calculated both by conventional methods such as by the finite element method. The results show significant discrepancies between the two methods that lead to significant differences in the dimensioning of this type of foundation. The use of traditional methods results, on one hand, to an overdimensioning of the reinforced of the centering beam and, on the other hand, to an underdimensioning, both the height of the centering beam, such as the size of the party shoe and the reinforced of the beam of the first floor. After the analysis and discussion of results, the thesis proposes a new alternative method, conventional type and, therefore, applicable to a manual calculation in a reasonable time, that allows to obtain the key parameters that govern the behavior of party and corner shoes, leading to a dimensioning more adjusted to the real needings of this type of foundation

    Estudio del comportamiento de zapatas de medianería con viga centradora mediante modelos de elementos finitos

    Full text link
    Investigación sobre el cálculo de zapatas de medianería utilizando métodos no convencionales. Las dos soluciones más empleadas en edificación para el problema de las cimentaciones de medianería son la utilización de una viga centradora que conecta la zapata de medianería con la zapata del pilar interior más próximo y la colaboración de la viga de la primera planta trabajando como tirante. Los modelos convencionales existentes para el cálculo de este tipo de cimentaciones presentan una serie de simplificaciones que permiten el cálculo de las mismas, por medios manuales, en un tiempo razonable, pero presentan el inconveniente de su posible alejamiento del comportamiento real de la cimentación. El presente trabajo desarrolla un contraste de los modelos convencionales de cálculo de cimentaciones de medianería, mediante un análisis alternativo con modelos de elementos finitos. Los resultados obtenidos constatan importantes discrepancias entre ambos modelos y ponen de manifiesto las grandes posibilidades del método de elementos finitos como herramienta apropiada para desarrollar modelos simplificados más ajustados a la realidad
    corecore