Administration of intravenous iron formulations induces complement activation in-vivo

Background: Intravenous (IV) iron is widely used to treat anemia in chronic kidney disease patients. Previously, iron formulations were shown to induce immune activation in-vitro. The current study aimed to investigate the effect of IV iron on complement activation in-vivo, and whether this subsequently induces inflammation and/or oxidative stress. Methods: Two distinct patient groups were included: 51 non-dialysis and 32 dialysis patients. The non-dialysis group received iron sucrose or ferric carboxymaltose, based on physicians’ choice. Plasma samples were collected prior to and 1 h after completion of IV iron infusion. The dialysis group received iron sucrose exclusively. Plasma samples were collected at the start and end of two consecutive hemodialysis sessions, one with and one without IV iron. Finally, plasma levels of MBL, C1q, properdin, factor D, sC5b-9, MPO, PTX3 were assessed by ELISA. Results: In the non-dialysis group, sC5b-9 levels significantly increased after IV iron by 32%, while levels of factor D and MBL significantly dropped. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that iron sucrose induced complement activation whereas ferric carboxymaltose did not. In the dialysis group, levels of sC5b-9 significantly increased by 46% during the dialysis session with IV iron, while factor D levels significantly fell. Furthermore, the relative decrease in factor D by IV iron correlated significantly with the relative increase in sC5b-9 by IV iron. MPO levels rose significantly during the dialysis session with IV iron, but not in the session without iron. Moreover, the relative increase in MPO and sC5b-9 by IV iron correlated significantly. PTX3 levels were not affected by IV iron. Conclusions: Iron sucrose but not ferric carboxymaltose, results in complement activation possibly via the lectin and alternative pathway partially mediating oxidative stress but not inflammation.Conflict of Interest Statement: CG received speaking fees and research funding from Vifor Pharma

Dutch guideline for the management of hypertensive crisis-2010 revision

Hypertensive crises are divided into hypertensive urgencies and emergencies. Together they form a heterogeneous group of acute hypertensive disorders depending on the presence or type of target organs involved. Despite better treatment options for hypertension, hypertensive crisis and its associated complications remain relatively common. In the Netherlands the number of patients starting renal replacement therapy because of 'malignant hypertension' has increased in the past two decades. In 2003, the first Dutch guideline on hypertensive crisis was released to allow a standardised evidence-based approach for patients presenting with a hypertensive crisis. In this paper we give an overview of the current management of hypertensive crisis and discuss several important changes incorporated in the 2010 revision. These changes include a modification in terminology replacing 'malignant hypertension' with 'hypertensive crisis with retinopathy' and reclassification of hypertensive crisis with retinopathy under hypertensive emergencies instead of urgencies. With regard to the treatment of hypertensive emergencies, nicardipine instead of nitroprusside or labetalol is favoured for the management of perioperative hypertension, whereas labetalol has become the drug of choice for the treatment of hypertension associated with pre-eclampsia. For the treatment of hypertensive urgencies, oral administration of nifedipine retard instead of captopril is recommended as first-line therapy. In addition, a section on the management of hypertensive emergencies according to the type of target organ involved has been added. Efforts to increase the awareness and treatment of hypertension in the population at large may lower the incidence of hypertensive crisis and its complications

Iron Administration, Infection, and Anemia Management in CKD: Untangling the Effects of Intravenous Iron Therapy on Immunity and Infection Risk

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk for infection, attributable to immune dysfunction, increased exposure to infectious agents, loss of cutaneous barriers, comorbid conditions, and treatment-related factors (eg, hemodialysis and immunosuppressant therapy). Because iron plays a vital role in pathogen reproduction and host immunity, it is biologically plausible that intravenous iron therapy and/or iron deficiency influence infection risk in CKD. Available data from preclinical experiments, observational studies, and randomized controlled trials are summarized to explore the interplay between intravenous iron and infection risk among patients with CKD, particularly those receiving maintenance hemodialysis. The current evidence base, including data from a recent randomized controlled trial, suggests that proactive judicious use of intravenous iron (in a manner that minimizes the accumulation of non–transferrin-bound iron) beneficially replaces iron stores while avoiding a clinically relevant effect on infection risk. In the absence of an urgent clinical need, intravenous iron therapy should be avoided in patients with active infection. Although serum ferritin concentration and transferrin saturation can help guide clinical decision making about intravenous iron therapy, definition of an optimal iron status and its precise determination in individual patients remain clinically challenging in CKD and warrant additional study

Broadly altered gene expression in blood leukocytes in essential hypertension is absent during treatment

We assessed whether large-scale expression profiling of leukocytes of patients with essential hypertension reflects characteristics of systemic disease and whether such changes are responsive to antihypertensive therapy. Total RNA from leukocytes were obtained from untreated (n=6) and treated (n=6) hypertensive patients without apparent end-organ damage and from normotensive controls (n=9). RNA was reverse-transcribed and labeled and gene expression analyzed using a 19-K oligonucleotide microarray using dye swaps. Samples of untreated and of treated patients were pooled for each sex and compared with age- and sex-matched controls. In untreated patients, 680 genes were differentially regulated (314 up and 366 down). In the treated patients, these changes were virtually absent (4 genes up, 3 genes down). A myriad of changes was observed in pathways involved in inflammation. Inflammation-dampening interleukin receptors were decreased in expression. Intriguingly, inhibitors of cytokine signaling (the PIAS family of proteins) were differentially expressed. The expression of several genes that are involved in regulation of blood pressure were also differentially expressed: angiotensin II type 1 receptor, ANP-A receptor, endothelin-2, and 3 of the serotonin receptors were increased, whereas endothelin-converting enzyme-1 was decreased. Strikingly, virtually no changes in gene expression could be detected in hypertensive patients who had become normotensive with treatment. This observation substantiates the long-standing idea that hypertension is associated with a complex systemic response involving inflammation-related genes. Furthermore, leukocytes display differential gene expression that is of importance in blood pressure control. Importantly, treatment of blood pressure to normal values can virtually correct such disturbances

An observational study on disturbed peripheral circadian rhythms in hemodialysis patients

The quality of life of hemodialysis (HD) patients is hampered by reduced nocturnal sleep quality and excessive daytime sleepiness. In addition to the sleep/wake cycle, levels of circadian biomarkers (e.g. melatonin) are disturbed in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This suggests impaired circadian clock performance in HD patients, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. In this observational study, diurnal rhythms of sleep, serum melatonin and cortisol concentrations and clock gene mRNA expression are compared between HD patients (n = 9) and healthy control subjects (n = 9). In addition, the presence of circulating factors that might affect circadian rhythmicity is tested in vitro with cell culture experiments. Reduced sleep quality (median sleep onset latency [interquartile range] of 23.9 [17.3] min for patients versus 5.0 [10] minutes for controls, p < 0.01; mean (+/- SD) sleep efficiency 70.2 +/- 8.1% versus 82.9 +/- 10.9%, p = 0.02 and mean awake minutes after sleep onset 104.8 +/- 27.9 versus 54.6 +/- 41.6 minutes, p = 0.01) and increased daytime sleepiness (mean Epworth Sleepiness Score of 10.0 +/- 4.8 versus 3.9 +/- 2.0, p < 0.01) were confirmed in HD patients. Reduced nocturnal melatonin concentrations (1 AM: 98.1 [122.9] pmol/L versus 12.5 [44.2] pmol/L, p = 0.019; 5 AM: 114.0 [131.6] pmol/L versus 11.8 [86.8] pmol/L, p = 0.031) and affected circadian control of cortisol rhythm and circadian expression of the clock gene REV-ERB alpha were found. HD patient serum had a higher capacity to synchronize cells in vitro, suggesting an accumulated level of clock resetting compounds in HD patients. These compounds were not cleared by hemodialysis treatment or related to frequently used medications. In conclusion, the abovementioned results strongly suggest a disturbance in circadian timekeeping in peripheral tissues of HD patients. Accumulation of clock resetting compounds possibly contributes to this. Future studies are needed for a better mechanistic understanding of the interaction between renal failure and perturbation of the circadian clock