Endoscopic Suturing for the Prevention and Treatment of Complications Associated with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Duodenal Adenomas

Background/Aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the primary treatment for duodenal adenomas; however, it is associated with a high risk of perforation and bleeding, especially with larger lesions. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic suturing (ES) for the closure of mucosal defects after duodenal EMR. Methods Consecutive adult patients who underwent ES of large mucosal defects after EMR of large (>2 cm) duodenal adenomas were retrospectively enrolled. The OverStitch ES system was employed for closing mucosal defects after EMR. Clinical outcomes and complications, including delayed bleeding and perforation, were documented. Results During the study period, ES of mucosal defects was performed in seven patients in eight sessions (six for prophylaxis and two for the treatment of perforation). All ES sessions were technically successful. No early or delayed post-EMR bleeding was recorded. In addition, no clinically obvious duodenal stricture or recurrence was encountered on endoscopic follow-up evaluation, and no patients required subsequent surgical intervention. Conclusions ES for the prevention and treatment of duodenal perforation after EMR is technically feasible, safe, and effective. ES should be considered an option for preventing or treating perforations associated with EMR of large duodenal adenomas

Recurrence of intestinal metaplasia and early neoplasia after endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett’s esophagus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Conflicting data exist with regard to recurrence rates of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and dysplasia after achieving complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) patients. Aim (i) To determine the incidence of recurrent IM and dysplasia achieving CE-IM and (ii) to compare recurrence rates between treatment modalities [radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with or without endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) vs stepwise complete EMR (SRER)]. Methods A systematic search was performed for studies reporting on outcomes and estimates of recurrence rates after achieving CE-IM. Pooled incidence [per 100-patient-years (PY)] and risk ratios with 95 %CI were obtained. Heterogeneity was measured using the I 2 statistic. Subgroup analyses, decided a priori, were performed to explore heterogeneity in results. Results A total of 39 studies were identified (25-RFA, 13-SRER, and 2 combined). The pooled incidence of any recurrence was 7.5 (95 %CI 6.1 – 9.0)/100 PY with a pooled incidence of IM recurrence rate of 4.8 (95 %CI 3.8 – 5.9)/100 PY, and dysplasia recurrence rate of 2.0 (95 %CI 1.5 – 2.5)/100 PY. Compared to the SRER group, the RFA group had significantly higher overall [8.6 (6.7 – 10.5)/100 PY vs. 5.1 (3.1 – 7)/100 PY, P = 0.01] and IM recurrence rates [5.8 (4.3 – 7.3)/100 PY vs. 3.1 (1.7 – 4)/100 PY, P &lt; 0.01] with no difference in recurrence rates of dysplasia. Significant heterogeneity between studies was identified. The majority of recurrences were amenable to repeat endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the incidence rates of overall, IM, and dysplasia recurrence rates post-EET are not inconsiderable and reinforce the importance of close surveillance after achieving CE-IM.</jats:p

A comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous and percutaneous biliary drainage after failed ERCP for malignant distal biliary obstruction

Background and study Aims: Selective biliary cannulation is unsuccessful in 5 % to 10 % of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). Percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) has been the gold standard, but endoscopic ultrasound guided rendezvous (EUSr) have been increasingly used for biliary decompression in this patient population. Our aim was to compare the initial success rate, long-term efficacy, and safety of PBD and EUSr in relieving MDBO after failed ERC Patients and methods: A retrospective study involving 50 consecutive patients who had an initial failed ERCP for MDBO. Twenty-five patients undergoing EUSr between 2008 – 2014 were compared to 25 patients who underwent PBD immediately prior to the introduction of EUSr at our center (2002 – 2008). Comparisons were made between the two groups with regard to technical success, duration of hospital stay and adverse event rates after biliary decompression. Results: The mean age at presentation was 66.5 (± 12.6 years), 28 patients (54.9 %) were female. The etiology of MDBO was pancreaticobiliary malignancy in 44 (88 %) and metastatic disease in 6 (12 %) cases. Biliary drainage was technically successful by EUSr in 19 (76 %) cases and by PBD in 25 (100 %) (P = 0.002). Median length of hospital stay after initial drainage was 1 day in the EUSr group vs 5 days in PBD group (P = 0.02). Repeat biliary intervention was required for 4 patients in the EUSr group and 15 in the PBD group (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Initial technical success with EUSr was significantly lower than with PBD, however when EUSr was successful, patients had a significantly shorter post-procedure hospital stay and required fewer follow-up biliary interventions. Meeting presentations: Annual Digestive Diseases Week 201

Weight Loss Can Lead to Resolution of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms: A Prospective Intervention Trial

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Singh, M., Lee, J., Gupta, N., Gaddam, S., Smith, B. K., Wani, S. B., Sullivan, D. K., Rastogi, A., Bansal, A., Donnelly, J. E. and Sharma, P. (2013), Weight loss can lead to resolution of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: A prospective intervention trial. Obesity, 21: 284–290. doi:10.1002/oby.20279, which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20279. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.OBJECTIVE Weight gain is an important risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, whether weight loss can lead to resolution of GERD symptoms is not clear. Our aim was to measure the impact of weight loss on GERD symptoms. DESIGN AND METHODS In a prospective cohort study at a tertiary referral center, overweight/obese subjects (BMI 25-39.9 kg/m2) were enrolled in a structured weight loss program. Weight loss strategies included dietary modifications, increased physical activity and behavioral changes. At baseline and at 6 months, BMI and waist circumference were measured and all participants completed a validated reflux disease questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 332 adult subjects, mean age 46 years and 66% women were prospectively enrolled. At baseline, the mean body weight, BMI, and waist circumference were 101 (±18) kg, 35 (±5) kg/m2 and 103 (±13) cm. At 6 months, majority of the subjects (97%) lost weight (average weight loss: 13 ± 7.7 kg) and as compared with baseline, there was a significant decrease in the overall prevalence of GERD (15 vs. 37%; P < 0.01) and the mean GERD symptom score (1.8 vs. 5.5; P < 0.01). Overall, 81% of the subjects had reduction in GERD symptom scores; 65% had complete resolution and 15% had partial resolution of reflux symptoms. There was a significant correlation between % body weight loss and reduction in GERD symptom scores (r = 0.17, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the overall prevalence of GERD symptoms is high (37%) in overweight and obese subjects. A structured weight loss program can lead to complete resolution of GERD symptoms in the majority of these subjects

Patterns of antiplatelet agent use in the US

Background: The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) published updated guidelines in 2009 to help endoscopists manage the treatment of their patients who have been prescribed antiplatelet therapy (APT). Study aim: To assess the use of APT among endoscopists, and to identify factors guiding their use of APT while treating their patients. Method: A survey questionnaire was distributed to endoscopists at two national meetings to assess their usage of APT while treating patients during the peri-endoscopic period. Results: The survey was provided to 400 attendees of whom 239 (60 %) responded. Only 30 % of respondents followed the ASGE guidelines for treating their patients and 26 % percent of respondents withheld all APT before engaging in any patient procedure. Endoscopists’ decisions appeared to be influenced by their own particular experiences rather than any specific APT usage guidelines (46 % vs 22 %; P < 0.05). As expected, more endoscopists (P < 0.05) continued APT for patients who underwent low risk procedures (90 %) than for patients who underwent high risk procedures (47 %). Approximately 50 % of the respondents did not perform high risk procedures for patients prescribed aspirin therapy. Conclusions: About one-fourth of endoscopists surveyed discontinued APT treatment of patients who underwent any endoscopic procedure, and one-half of them discontinued use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment of patients who underwent a high risk endoscopic procedure. Inappropriate withdrawal of APT medications may expose patients to unnecessary risks, and efforts to improve endoscopists’ application of ASGE guidelines for the use of APT to treat patients during the peri-endoscopic period are warranted

In-stent thrombosis after 68 months of implantation inspite of continuous dual antiplatelet therapy: a case report

Lately, there has been an increased incidence of late stent thrombosis; especially following Drug eluting stent (DES) implantation. Several factors are associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis, including the procedure itself, patient and lesion characteristics, stent design, and premature cessation of anti-platelet drugs. We present a case of late stent thrombosis (LST) following DES implantation after a period of 68 months, making it the longest reported case of LST reported in the literature, despite the use of dual anti-platelet therapy

Retrospective quantification of clinical abdominal DCE-MRI using pharmacokinetics-informed deep learning: a proof-of-concept study

IntroductionDynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI has important clinical value for early detection, accurate staging, and therapeutic monitoring of cancers. However, conventional multi-phasic abdominal DCE-MRI has limited temporal resolution and provides qualitative or semi-quantitative assessments of tissue vascularity. In this study, the feasibility of retrospectively quantifying multi-phasic abdominal DCE-MRI by using pharmacokinetics-informed deep learning to improve temporal resolution was investigated.MethodForty-five subjects consisting of healthy controls, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and chronic pancreatitis (CP) were imaged with a 2-s temporal-resolution quantitative DCE sequence, from which 30-s temporal-resolution multi-phasic DCE-MRI was synthesized based on clinical protocol. A pharmacokinetics-informed neural network was trained to improve the temporal resolution of the multi-phasic DCE before the quantification of pharmacokinetic parameters. Through ten-fold cross-validation, the agreement between pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from synthesized multi-phasic DCE after deep learning inference was assessed against reference parameters from the corresponding quantitative DCE-MRI images. The ability of the deep learning estimated parameters to differentiate abnormal from normal tissues was assessed as well.ResultsThe pharmacokinetic parameters estimated after deep learning have a high level of agreement with the reference values. In the cross-validation, all three pharmacokinetic parameters (transfer constant Ktrans, fractional extravascular extracellular volume ve, and rate constant kep) achieved intraclass correlation coefficient and R2 between 0.84–0.94, and low coefficients of variation (10.1%, 12.3%, and 5.6%, respectively) relative to the reference values. Significant differences were found between healthy pancreas, PDAC tumor and non-tumor, and CP pancreas.DiscussionRetrospective quantification (RoQ) of clinical multi-phasic DCE-MRI is possible by deep learning. This technique has the potential to derive quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters from clinical multi-phasic DCE data for a more objective and precise assessment of cancer

Multitasking dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can accurately differentiate chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background and aimsAccurate differentiation of chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an area of unmet clinical need. In this study, a novel Multitasking dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique was used to quantitatively evaluate the microcirculation properties of pancreas in CP and PDAC and differentiate between them.MethodsThe Multitasking DCE technique was able to acquire one 3D image per second during the passage of MRI contrast agent, allowing the quantitative estimation of microcirculation properties of tissue, including blood flow Fp, plasma volume fraction vp, transfer constant Ktrans, and extravascular extracellular volume fraction ve. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to differentiate the CP pancreas, PDAC pancreas, normal control pancreas, PDAC tumor, PDAC upstream, and PDAC downstream. ROCs from quantitative analysis and conventional analysis were compared.ResultsFourteen PDAC patients, 8 CP patients and 20 healthy subjects were prospectively recruited. The combination of Fp, vp, Ktrans, and ve can differentiate CP versus PDAC pancreas with good AUC (AUC [95% CI] = 0.821 [0.654 – 0.988]), CP versus normal pancreas with excellent AUC (1.000 [1.000 – 1.000]), PDAC pancreas versus normal pancreas with excellent AUC (1.000 [1.000 – 1.000]), CP versus PDAC tumor with excellent AUC (1.000 [1.000 – 1.000]), CP versus PDAC downstream with excellent AUC (0.917 [0.795 – 1.000]), and CP versus PDAC upstream with fair AUC (0.722 [0.465 – 0.980]). This quantitative analysis outperformed conventional analysis in differentiation of each pair.ConclusionMultitasking DCE MRI is a promising clinical tool that is capable of unbiased quantitative differentiation between CP from PDAC

Transpapillary drainage has no added benefit on treatment outcomes in patients undergoing EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a large multicenter study

Background and Aims The need for transpapillary drainage (TPD) in patients undergoing transmural drainage (TMD) of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) remains unclear. The aims of this study were to compare treatment outcomes between patients with pancreatic pseudocysts undergoing TMD versus combined (TMD and TPD) drainage (CD) and to identify predictors of symptomatic and radiologic resolution. Methods This is a retrospective review of 375 consecutive patients with PFCs who underwent EUS-guided TMD from 2008 to 2014 at 15 academic centers in the United States. Main outcome measures included TMD and CD technical success, treatment outcomes (symptomatic and radiologic resolution) at follow-up, and predictors of treatment outcomes on logistic regression. Results A total of 375 patients underwent EUS-guided TMD of PFCs, of which 174 were pseudocysts. TMD alone was performed in 95 (55%) and CD in 79 (45%) pseudocysts. Technical success was as follows: TMD, 92 (97%) versus CD, 35 (44%) (P = .0001). There was no difference in adverse events between the TMD (15%) and CD (14%) cohorts (P = .23). Median long-term (LT) follow-up after transmural stent removal was 324 days (interquartile range, 72-493 days) for TMD and 201 days (interquartile range, 150-493 days) (P = .37). There was no difference in LT symptomatic resolution (TMD, 69% vs CD, 62%; P = .61) or LT radiologic resolution (TMD, 71% vs CD, 67%; P = .79). TPD attempt was negatively associated with LT radiologic resolution of pseudocyst (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.8; P = .03). Conclusions TPD has no benefit on treatment outcomes in patients undergoing EUS-guided TMD of pancreatic pseudocysts and negatively affects LT resolution of PFCs