arthropodpitfalldata

Arthropod prey abundance at study sites in two habitats. arthropods: number of arthropod prey caught in each pitfall trap (over 24 hours) month: number identifying month the trap was set site: number (1:10) identifying the site where the trap was set hab: character identifying whether the trap was set in the upland (u) or wash (w

thermalqualitydata

The thermal quality in study sites. time.tset: number of hours the thermal model was between 32.2 C and 26.0 C (preferred temperature range of ornate tree lizards) for each julian day a model recorded data site: number (1:10) identifying the site hab: character identifying whether the thermal model was in the upland (u) or wash (w) month: number identifying the mont

Appendix B. A list of references used in the construction of the phylogenetic tree of study species (Appendix D) necessary for the calculation of phylogenetically independent contrasts used to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.

A list of references used in the construction of the phylogenetic tree of study species (Appendix D) necessary for the calculation of phylogenetically independent contrasts used to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation

Appendix D. A phylogenetic tree of study species generated from references in Appendix B and used to derive phylogenetically independent contrasts testing the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.

A phylogenetic tree of study species generated from references in Appendix B and used to derive phylogenetically independent contrasts testing the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation

Appendix C. A figure showing world distribution of locations where thermoregulation was studied quantitatively, allowing a test of the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.

A figure showing world distribution of locations where thermoregulation was studied quantitatively, allowing a test of the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation

Appendix A. A table showing information on species for which quantitative thermoregulatory data were available to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.

A table showing information on species for which quantitative thermoregulatory data were available to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation

Classification performance for the testing data used to classify Blanding’s turtle and Painted turtle activity based on accelerometry data, using the other species’ threshold values.

Classification performance for the testing data used to classify Blanding’s turtle and Painted turtle activity based on accelerometry data, using the other species’ threshold values.</p

S2 Fig -

Accelerometer (left) and VHF transmitter (right) bolted onto the rear carapace margin of a Painted turtle. (PDF)</p

Overall classification performance for the testing data used to classify Blanding’s turtle and Painted turtle activity based on accelerometry and water sensor data, sampled at 1 Hz.

Overall classification performance for the testing data used to classify Blanding’s turtle and Painted turtle activity based on accelerometry and water sensor data, sampled at 1 Hz.</p

Sample histogram separating activity modes in Blanding’s turtles: Terrestrial in-motion from motionless and aquatic in-motion from motionless.

The red vertical line indicates the threshold value determined after testing the accuracy of ΔODBA values within the overlapping regions. These histograms are based on data sampled at 1 Hz. (PDF)</p