Pooled Analysis of Clinical Outcome of Patients with Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated within Phase I/II Clinical Studies Based on Individual Biomarkers of Susceptibility : a Single-Institution Experience

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies have a poor prognosis. In this setting, recruitment into clinical trials is warranted, and studies driven by selection according to individual tumor molecular characteristics are expected to provide added value. OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with mCRC refractory to or following failure of standard therapies who were enrolled into phase I/II clinical studies at the Niguarda Cancer Center based on the presence of a specific molecular profile expected to represent the target of susceptibility to the experimental drug(s). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2011 to May 2016, 2044 patients with mCRC underwent molecular screening. Eighty patients (3.9%) were enrolled in ad hoc studies; the median age was 60 years (range 36-86) and the median number of previous treatment lines was five (range 2-8). Molecular characteristics exploited within these studies were MGMT promoter hypermethylation (48.7%), HER2 amplification (28.8%), BRAF V600E mutation (20%), and novel gene fusions involving ALK or NTRK (2.5%). RESULTS: One patient (1%) had RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) complete response (CR), 13 patients (16.5%) experienced a partial response (PR), and 28 (35%) stable disease (SD). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months (range 2.63-3.83), with 24% of patients displaying PFS >5 months. Median growth modulation index (GMI) was 0.85 (range 0-15.61) and 32.5% of patients had GMI >1.33. KRAS exon 2 mutations were found in 38.5% of patients, and among the 78 patients with known KRAS status, those with wild-type tumors had longer PFS than those with mutated tumors (3.80 [95% CI 2.80-5.03] vs. 2.13 months [95% CI 1.77-2.87], respectively, p = 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 7.83 months (range 7.17-9.33) for all patients, and patients with KRAS wild-type tumors had longer OS than those with mutated tumors (7.83 [95% CI 7.33-10.80] vs. 7.18 months [95% CI 5.63-9.33], respectively, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This single-institution retrospective study indicates that in a heavily pretreated population approximately 4% of mCRC tumors display a potential actionable molecular context suitable for therapeutic intervention. Application of molecular selection is challenging but improves clinical outcome even in later lines of treatment

Guideline Application in Real world: multi-Institutional Based survey of Adjuvant and first-Line pancreatic Ductal adenocarcinoma treatment in Italy. Primary analysis of the GARIBALDI survey

Background: Information about the adherence to scientific societies guidelines in the ‘real-world’ therapeutic management of oncological patients are lacking. This multicenter, prospective survey was aimed to improve the knowledge relative to 2017-2018 recommendations of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM). Patients and methods: Treatment-naive adult patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Group A received adjuvant therapy, group B received primary chemotherapy, and group C had metastatic disease. The results on patients accrued until 31 October 2019 with a mature follow-up were presented. Results: Since July 2017, 833 eligible patients of 923 (90%) were enrolled in 44 Italian centers. The median age was 69 years (range 36-89 years; 24% >75 years); 48% were female; 93% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) score of 0 or 1; group A: 16%, group B: 30%; group C: 54%; 72% Nord, 13% Center, 15% South. In group A, guidelines adherence was 68% [95% confidence interval (CI) 59% to 76%]; 53% of patients received gemcitabine and 15% gemcitabine + capecitabine; median CA19.9 was 29 (range 0-7300; not reported 15%); median survival was 36.4 months (95% CI 27.5-47.3 months). In group B, guidelines adherence was 96% (95% CI 92% to 98%); 55% of patients received nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine, 27% FOLFIRINOX, 12% gemcitabine, and 3% clinical trial; median CA19.9 was 337 (range 0-20220; not reported 9%); median survival was 18.1 months (95% CI 15.6-19.9 months). In group C, guidelines adherence was 96% (95% CI 94% to 98%); 71% of patients received nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine, 16% gemcitabine, 8% FOLFIRINOX, and 4% clinical trial; liver and lung metastases were reported in 76% and 23% of patients, respectively; median CA19.9 value was 760 (range 0-1374500; not reported 9%); median survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 9.1-11.1 months). Conclusions: The GARIBALDI survey shows a very high rate of adherence to guidelines and survival outcome in line with the literature. CA19.9 testing should be enhanced; nutritional and psychological counseling represent an unmet need. Enrollment to assess adherence to updated AIOM guidelines is ongoing

Ultrastruttura dei tessuti dentari affetti da carie iniziale in un campione di bambini in età scolare

Aim of the work. The purpose of this work is twofold: to describe the epidemiological investigation on food habits and oral hygiene of a sample of children and to show images of ultrastructural hard dental tissue modifications during the acid demineralization process and the carious one. The study aim at evaluating the correlation between an incorrect diet and an inadequate dental hygiene, and the consequent clinical and therapeutical implications. Materials and methods. The epidemiological study, carried out on a sample of children, was supported by the use of a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to better observe the effects that an incorrect diet has on hard dental tissues. Results. The microscopic scansion observation of hard dental tissues is objectively the best way to detect even the slightest and sub-clinical morphological alterations. Conclusions. The alterations of hard dental tissues found were the result of acid dissolution due to the activity of the demineralization of food containing a high cariogenic power and to the incorrect oral hygiene habits, which were very common in the sample of children studied

Entrectinib for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC: safety and efficacy

Introduction: Gene fusions are strong driver alterations in various cancers, increasingly diagnosed with multiple testing techniques. ROS1 fusions can be found in 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been tested in this oncogene-driven disease. NTRK fusions are characteristic of a few rare types of cancer, also infrequently seen in some common cancers including NSCLC. Entrectinib is a newer ROS1 and NTRK inhibitor developed across different tumor types harboring rearrangements in these genes. Entrectinib was granted FDA accelerated approval in August 2019 for the treatment of ROS1+ NSCLC and NTRK-driven solid tumors. Areas covered: This review covers the mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of entrectinib in patients with metastatic NSCLC. Expert opinion: Entrectinib is an orally bioavailable TKI of TrkA, TrkB, TrkC, and ROS1, with the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Entrectinib was effective and well-tolerated in patients harboring ROS1- or NTRK-rearranged NSCLC treated within phase I and II studies. Entrectinib appears to be the most appropriate treatment choice for TKIs-na\uefve patients, especially in those presenting brain metastasis. Conversely, in case of systemic progression with the evidence of acquired resistance mutations in ROS1 or Trk proteins, a sequential therapy with entrectinib could not be successful