36 research outputs found

    On Gc, Jc and the characterisation of the mode-I fracture resistance in delamination or adhesive debonding

    Get PDF
    We focus on the mode-I quasi-static crack propagation in adhesive joints or composite laminates, where inelastic behaviour is due to damage on a relatively thin interface that can be effectively modelled with a cohesive-zone model (CZM). We studied the difference between the critical energy release rate, G c , in- troduced in linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM), and the work of separation, , i.e. the area under the traction-separation law of the CZM. This difference is given by the derivative, with respect to the crack length, of the energy dissipated ahead of the crack tip per unit of specimen width. For a steady- state crack propagation, in which that energy remains constant as the crack tip advances, this derivative vanishes and =G c . Thus, the difference between and G c depends on how far from steady-state the process is, and not on the size of the damage zone, unlike what is stated elsewhere in the literature. Therefore, even for very ductile interfaces, G c = for a double cantilever beam (DCB) loaded with mo- ments and their difference is extremely small for a DCB loaded with forces. We also show that the proof that the critical value of the J integral, J c , is equal to the nonlinear energy release rate is not valid for a non-homogeneous material. To compute G c for a DCB, we use a method based on the introduction of an equivalent crack length, a eq , where the solution is a product of a closed-form part, which does not require the measurement of the actual crack length, and of a corrective factor where the knowledge of the actual crack length is required. However, we also show that this factor is close to unity and therefore has a very small effect on G c

    Master-slave approach for the modelling of joints with dependent degrees of freedom in flexible mechanisms

    Get PDF
    The analysis of multibody systems requires an exact description of the kinematics of the joints involved. In the present work the master–slave approach is employed and endowed with the possibility of including several more complex types of joints. We present the formulation for joints where some relation between the different released degrees of freedom exists such as the screw joint, the rack‐and‐pinion joint or the cam joint. These joints are implemented in conjunction with geometrically exact beams and an energy‐momentum conserving time‐stepping algorithm

    Dynamics of 3-D co-rotational beams

    No full text

    Energy-momentum dynamic integrator for geometrically exact 3D beams Attempt at a strain-invariant solution

    No full text
    SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:4360.170V(99-04) / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo
    corecore