Sheep Updates 2005 - Part 7

This session covers eight papers from different authors: POSTERS 1. Sulpher in wool and its implications for fleece weight and sheep health, SM Liu, AC Schlink, JR Williams, CSIRO Livestock Industries Wembley WA, ME Dowling,JCGreef, Department of Agriculture Western Australia. 2. Stubbles for sheep: a reality check, Roy Butler, Keith Croker, Department of Agriculture Western Australia. 3. Genetic benchmarking using artificial insemination, LC Butler, JC Greeff, Department of Agriculture Western Australia. 4. The potential lambing performances of ewes in mixed age flocks, Kieth Croker, Department of Agriculture Western Australia, Rob Davidson, WAMMCO International, formally University of Western Australia, Ken Hart, Department of Agriculture Western Australia,Doug Harrington Cowcher Farms Narrogin, Mario D\u27Antuono, Department of Agriculture Western Australia. 5. National Livestock Identification System (Sheep) in Western Australia, Julian Gardner, Department of Agriculture Western Australia. DISPLAYS - TOOLS 6. To Feed or Not to Feed - I Only Hamlet had the Calculator!, Geoff Duddy, Livestock Officer(Sheep & Wool) Yanco. 7. WormBoss - a national Australian computer-based sheep worm control tool, RG Woodgate, Department of Agriculture Western Australia, A LeFeuvre, Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, and Genie Pty Ltd, Warwick Qld, A Bailey, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Kings Meadow Tas, RB Besier, Department of Agriculture Western Australia, N. Campbell, Department of Primary Industries Victoria, Attwood Vic, I Carmichael, South Australian Research and Development Institute, Glenside SA, S. Love, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Armidale NSW. 8. \u27Eye in the sky\u27 takes guesswork out of farmers pasture decisions, Richard Stovold, Department of Land Informatio

Core outcome set for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the COS-AECOPD ERS Task Force study protocol.

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the management of COPD exacerbations evaluate heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those that are clinically important and patient relevant. This limits their usability and comparability. A core outcome set (COS) is a consensus-based minimum set of clinically important outcomes that should be evaluated in all RCTs in specific areas of health care. We present the study protocol of the COS-AECOPD ERS Task Force, aiming to develop a COS for COPD exacerbation management, that could remedy these limitations. For the development of this COS we follow standard methodology recommended by the COMET initiative. A comprehensive list of outcomes is assembled through a methodological systematic review of the outcomes reported in relevant RCTs. Qualitative research with patients with COPD will also be conducted, aiming to identify additional outcomes that may be important to patients, but are not currently addressed in clinical research studies. Prioritisation of the core outcomes will be facilitated through an extensive, multi-stakeholder Delphi survey with a global reach. Selection will be finalised in an international, multi-stakeholder meeting. For every core outcome, we will recommend a specific measurement instrument and standardised time points for evaluation. Selection of instruments will be based on evidence-informed consensus. Our work will improve the quality, usability and comparability of future RCTs on the management of COPD exacerbations and, ultimately, the care of patients with COPD. Multi-stakeholder engagement and societal support by the European Respiratory Society will raise awareness and promote implementation of the COS

ERS statement: A core outcome set for clinical trials evaluating the management of COPD exacerbations

Clinical trials evaluating the management of acute exacerbations of COPD assess heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those that are clinically relevant or more important to patients. We have developed a core outcome set, a consensus-based minimum set of important outcomes that we recommend are evaluated in all future clinical trials on exacerbations management, to improve their quality and comparability. COPD exacerbations outcomes were identified through methodological systematic reviews and qualitative interviews with 86 patients from 11 countries globally. The most critical outcomes were prioritised for inclusion in the core outcome set through a two-round Delphi survey completed by 1063 participants (256 patients, 488 health professionals and 319 clinical academics) from 88 countries in five continents. Two global, multi-stakeholder, virtual consensus meetings were conducted to 1) finalise the core outcome set and 2) prioritise a single measurement instrument to be used for evaluating each of the prioritised outcomes. Consensus was informed by rigorous methodological systematic reviews. The views of patients with COPD were accounted for at all stages of the project. Survival, treatment success, breathlessness, quality of life, activities of daily living, the need for a higher level of care, arterial blood gases, disease progression, future exacerbations and hospital admissions, treatment safety and adherence were all included in the core outcome set. Focused methodological research was recommended to further validate and optimise some of the selected measurement instruments. The panel did not consider the prioritised set of outcomes and associated measurement instruments to be burdensome for patients and health professionals to use

Towards a landscape systems-based forage assessment tool for the Kimberly region of Western Australia

The Kimberly region of Western Australia is predominantly used for cattle production and the pastures are subjected to arid and high-rainfall conditions delineated by 'dry' and 'wet' seasons. Typical of this region, Liveringa Station, of 280,000 Ha is characterised by a number of land systems which, owing to variations in soil type and pasture composition sustain varying levels of stocking rates, ranging from 1.4 - 10.5 head/square km. A key challenge faced by livestock managers is to assess forage available at the end of the wet season in order to retain optimal stock numbers (generally cows with calves at foot) through the ensuing dry season. However during the wet season, limited accessibility precludes a detailed ground assessment of the forage resource. The aim of this project is to design and develop a satellite image-based pasture resource assessment tool, based on Pastures from Space®, that works within individual land systems. The initial calibration activities will involve site selection, based on production-relevant land system units, forage biomass sampling, ground cover and remnant vegetation assessment and field radiometry. Livestock tracking collars will also be deployed into key paddocks allowing a preliminary assessment of livestock-landscape interactions in each of the key land systems. This paper will outline the scope and experimental design of this project

Ground truthing protocols for biomass estimation in rangeland environments

Remote sensing for the assessment and mapping of total standing biomass relies on accurate ground data for calibration and validation. The spatial heterogeneity of rangelands pose challenges in sampling methodologies, demanding a large number of replicate measurements that are expensive and labour demanding when working on the scale of pastoral stations. In this paper we present a ground truthing protocol that can be used for biomass estimation in heterogeneous rangeland environments, important for the development of assessments based on remote sensing or growth modelling. The protocol is based on a combination of visual estimates, crop circle NDVI, and disk-plate meter height recordings. Relationships between these indirect measurements and biomass were specific for either season or vegetation type. A combination of these measurements in a multivariate regression provided an accurate alternative, while strongly reducing the number of cuts required