Left ventricular flow from apex to base during systole and isovolumic relaxation in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and midventricular obstruction

The occurrence of a left ventricular anterograde flow velocity (maximal: 3·9m . s−1) is demonstrated in a 32-year-old patient with hypertrophic cardioinyopathy and midveniricular obstruction, beginning at early systole and persisting throughout the isovolumic relaxation. Cardiac catheterization with simultaneous dual high fidelity pressure measurements in the apical and basal chambers confirmed the presence of the Doppler maximal instantaneous pressure gradient of 60 mmHg. Contrast left ventricular angiography excluded apical dyskinesia. In the two intracavity compartments, isovolumic relaxation time and the time constant of pressure decay (τ) were abnormal whereby τ was more delayed in the apical than in the basal portion. The presence of an apical high pressure zone during systole with impeded and delayed emptying through the midventricular obstacle and the late onset and prolongation of relaxation are thought to be the cause of the intraventricular flow from apex to base lasting from early systole throughout isovolumic relaxatio

Predictability of aortic dissection as a function of aortic diameter

The role of aortic diameter on the occurrence of type A dissection was investigated in 73 patients with dilated ascending aorta at the lime of pre-operative evaluation. Using transthoracic echocardiography for diagnosis and measurements, 54 patients were identified with type A dissection (group 1) and 19 without dissection (group 2). The true mean aortic diameters were identical (6·0±1·3 cm in group 1 and 6·4±1·4 cm in group 2; mean±SD; ns) as were the indexed aortic diameters (ratio of diameter/body surface area; 3·2±0·8 cm . m−12 and 3·4±0·7cm m−2 respectively; ns). However, the individual diameters showed a pronounced scatter in both groups (range from 3·6±11·0 cm). Of the 73 patients, 66 had surgery (47/54 with and 19/19 without dissection) and seven patients were treated medically. Emergency surgery was performed in 45/66 patients (all with acute type A dissection) andelective repair in 21/66 (19 without and two with chronic type A dissection). In-hospital mortality was 18% in the emergency group, 5% in the elective group and 57% in the medical group. It is concluded that patients with dilated ascending aorta have a substantial incidence of acute dissection. Their clinical course is unpredictable; acute dissection occurs in some, and in others the ascending aorta continues to enlarge without dissection. Because patients with dissection often arrive too late for elective repair andhave to be operated on as emergencies with a higher operative risk, we recommend elective surgery before the diameter of the ascending aorta has reached 6 c

Intramural haematoma of the thoracic aorta: who's to be alerted the cardiologist or the cardiac surgeon?

This review article is written so as to present the pathophysiology, the symptomatology and the ways of diagnosis and treatment of a rather rare aortic disease called Intra-Mural Haematoma (IMH). Intramural haematoma is a quite uncommon but potentially lethal aortic disease that can strike as a primary occurrence in hypertensive and atherosclerotic patients to whom there is spontaneous bleeding from vasa vasorum into the aortic wall (media) or less frequently, as the evolution of a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU). IMH displays a typical of dissection progress, and could be considered as a precursor of classic aortic dissection. IMH enfeebles the aortic wall and may progress to either outward rupture of the aorta or inward disruption of the intima layer, which ultimately results in aortic dissection. Chest and back acute penetrating pain is the most commonly noticed symptom at patients with IMH. Apart from a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), a tomographic imaging such as a chest computed tomography (CT), a magnetic resonance (MRI) and most lately a multy detector computed tomography (MDCT) can ensure a quick and accurate diagnosis of IMH. Similar to type A and B aortic dissection, surgery is indicated at patients with type-A IMH, as well as at patients with a persistent and/or recurrent pain. For any other patient (with type-B IMH without an incessant pain and/or without complications), medical treatment is suggested, as applied in the case of aortic dissection. The outcome of IMH in ascending aorta (type A) appears favourable after immediate (emergent or urgent) surgical intervention, but according to international bibliography patients with IMH of the descending aorta (type B) show similar mortality rates to those being subjected to conservative medical or surgical treatment. Endovascular surgery and stent-graft placement is currently indicated in type B IMH

Left ventricular flow from apex to base during systole and isovolumic relaxation in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and midventricular obstruction

The occurrence of a left ventricular anterograde flow velocity (maximal: 3·9m . s−1) is demonstrated in a 32-year-old patient with hypertrophic cardioinyopathy and midveniricular obstruction, beginning at early systole and persisting throughout the isovolumic relaxation. Cardiac catheterization with simultaneous dual high fidelity pressure measurements in the apical and basal chambers confirmed the presence of the Doppler maximal instantaneous pressure gradient of 60 mmHg. Contrast left ventricular angiography excluded apical dyskinesia. In the two intracavity compartments, isovolumic relaxation time and the time constant of pressure decay (τ) were abnormal whereby τ was more delayed in the apical than in the basal portion. The presence of an apical high pressure zone during systole with impeded and delayed emptying through the midventricular obstacle and the late onset and prolongation of relaxation are thought to be the cause of the intraventricular flow from apex to base lasting from early systole throughout isovolumic relaxatio

Gender and noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women and men

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the impact of the gender of physicians and patients on the accuracy of diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) based on the patient history only. METHODS: Screening involved 1082 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected CAD. Known CAD was an exclusion criterion. The inclusion criteria were met by 144 patients (47 females). All patients were inverviewed by both an experienced male cardiologist (n=6) and an experienced female cardiologist (n=5), who had to state before coronary angiography if CAD was present relying solely on the patient interview. Eligible subjects also answered a questionnaire. Diagnostic performance to assess the presence or absence of CAD by history taking by male and female cardiologists, exercise testing, patient self-assessment, and the questionnaire were compared. RESULTS: Coronary angiography showed significant CAD in 20 females (43%) and 70 males (72%). Diagnostic accuracy was not different between male (79%) and female (79%) cardiologists and comparable to the results of exercise testing (74%) but better than self-assessment by the patients (65%, p=0.01) or a questionnaire (68%, p=0.01). The accuracy of female physicians was better in men than in women (85% vs. 66%, p=0.01). The specificity of male physicians tended to be better in women than in men (74% vs. 59%, p=0.25). Female cardiologists overestimated the presence of CAD in women (specificity 48% vs. 74%, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The female cardiologists did not assess women more accurately than did their male colleagues. The diagnostic accuracy of these male and female cardiologists was quite good. However, both tend to assess patients of the opposite gender more specifically. There may be an impact of the gender of the physician on the accuracy of diagnosis of CAD by history taking