3 research outputs found
Higher soil capacity of intercepting heavy rainfall in mixed stands than in pure stands in riparian forests
Changes in global precipitation patterns would make wet regions lore humid and extreme precipitation events occur frequently, followed by widespread flooding. Riparian forests are more capable of withstanding floods than inland forests because they are frequently exposed to short-term flooding events. Although many previous studies have investigated the soil water dynamics of terrestrial forests, little is known about how the soil water of riparian forests responds to different amounts of rainfall and which factors mainly regulate the soil water-holding capacity. Here, we employed stable hydrogen isotope to explore the contribution of different magnitudes of rainfall (7.9, 18.6 and 34.1 mm) to the soil water in two types of riparian forests (pure vs. mixed stand of Populus deltoides) in the middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River, China. We further used structure equation modelling to determine the relative importance of soil properties and vegetation biomass in affecting the contribution of different magnitudes of rainfall to soil water. Our results revealed that there was no significant difference between these two stand types in the contributions of light and moderate rainfall to soil water, while the contribution of heavy rainfall to soil water (CHRSW) in mixed stand was significantly higher than that in pure stand (74.3% vs. 62.9%), suggesting that mixed stand soil has higher water-holding capacity than pure stand soil. Furthermore, soil properties were the best predictor affecting CHRSW, which explained 68% and 59% of the variation in the CHRSW on the 1st and 8th days after rainfall, respectively. Moreover, the root biomass could indirectly affect the CHRSW. Overall, mixed stand soil had a greater capacity in intercepting and storing rainwater than pure stand soil, implying that the mixed stand plantation, rather than the pure stand, should be recommended in riparian forest restoration projects that aim to improve their capacity for alleviating floods. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
The clinical experience of early skin-to-skin contact combined with non-nutritive comfort sucking in mothers of preterm infants: a qualitative study
Abstract Background In most areas of China, mothers typically do not participate in early care of preterm infants in NICU. This study aims to examine the early experience of mothers of preterm infants participating in skin-to-skin contact combined with non-nutritive comfort sucking in China. Methods This qualitative research study used one-on-one, face-to-face, semi-structured in-depth interviews. Eighteen mothers who participated in early skin-to-skin contact combined with non-nutritive comfort sucking were interviewed in the NICU of a tertiary children’s hospital in Shanghai between July and December 2020. Their experiences were analyzed using the inductive topic analysis method. Results Five themes about skin-to-skin contact combined with non-nutritive comfort sucking were identified, including alleviation of maternal anxiety and fear during mother infant separation, reshaping the maternal role, promotion of active breast pumping, enhances the mother’s willingness to actively breast feed and building the maternal confidence in baby care. Conclusion Skin-to-skin contact combined with non-nutritive comfort sucking in the NICU can not only enhance the identity and responsibility of the mother’s role, but also provide non-nutritive sucking experience for promoting the establishment of oral feeding in preterm infants