Incidence of brachial plexus injury after cardiac surgery : a retrospective study

Abstract: Background: Brachial plexopathy is a rare but debilitating injury associated with cardiac surgery. The reported incidence varies widely. Several risk factors have been described, including both patient and surgical factors.Objectives: The aim of this study is to (1) investigate the incidence of brachial plexus injury in cardiac surgery in a three-year period in our hospital, (2) give an overview of risk factors and possible mechanisms of brachial plexopathy, and (3) consider the legal ramifications of these injuries.Design and setting: single centre retrospective studyMethods: Data were collected retrospectively from all patients undergoing cardiac surgery in a major hospital in a three-year year period (N = 1305). Hospital records were screened for patients who underwent an electromyography after their surgery. Those cases were further investigated for brachial plexus injury. Patient characteristics and data applying to known risk factors for peroperative nerve injury were obtained.Results: Brachial plexus injury was observed in 7 out of 1305 patients (0.54%). All patients with brachial plexus injury underwent coronary artery bypass surgery with internal mammary artery harvesting at the side of the injury. No further analysis concerning risk factors was performed since only seven cases were identified and underreporting was suspected.Conclusion: Our data suggest that brachial plexus injury in cardiac surgery might be associated with asymmetrical sternal retraction during internal mammary artery harvesting. These findings correspond with previous reports, although it would be interesting to further investigate the importance of the exact placement and type of retractor used

Deep Neuromuscular Block and Surgical Conditions During Bariatric Surgery In Response

Item does not contain fulltex

The Effect of Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Block on Surgical Conditions and Postoperative Respiratory Function in Bariatric Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: In recent literature, it has been suggested that deep neuromuscular block (NMB) improves surgical conditions during laparoscopy; however, the evidence supporting this statement is limited, and this was not investigated in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Moreover, residual NMB could impair postoperative respiratory function. We tested the hypotheses that deep NMB could improve the quality of surgical conditions for laparoscopic bariatric surgery compared with moderate NMB and investigated whether deep NMB puts patients at risk for postoperative respiratory impairment compared with moderate NMB. METHODS: Sixty patients were evenly randomized over a deep NMB group (rocuronium bolus and infusion maintaining a posttetanic count of 1-2) and a moderate NMB group (rocuronium bolus and top-ups maintaining a train-of-four count of 1-2). Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol and remifentanil. The primary outcome measures were the quality of surgical conditions assessed by a single surgeon using a 5-point rating scale (1 = extremely poor, 5 = optimal), the number of intra-abdominal pressure increases >18 cmH2O and the duration of surgery. Secondary outcome measure was the postoperative pulmonary function assessed by peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and forced vital capacity, and by the need for postoperative respiratory support. Data are presented as mean +/- standard deviation with estimated treatment effect (ETE: mean difference [95% confidence interval]) for group comparisons. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the surgeon's rating regarding the quality of the surgical field between the deep and moderate NMB group (4.2 +/- 1.0 vs 3.9 +/- 1.1; P = .16, respectively; ETE: 0.4 [-0.1, 0.9]). There was no difference in the proportional rating of surgical conditions over the 5-point rating scale between both groups (P = .91). The number of intra-abdominal pressure increases >18 cmH2O and the duration of surgery were not statistically different between the deep and moderate NMB group (0.2 +/- 0.9 vs 0.3 +/- 1.0; P = .69; ETE: -0.1 [-0.5, 0.4] and 61.3 +/- 15.1 minutes vs 70.6 +/- 20.8 minutes; P = .07, ETE: -9.3 [-18.8, 0.1], respectively). All the pulmonary function tests were considerably impaired in both groups when compared with baseline (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the decrease in peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and forced vital capacity (expressed as % change from baseline) between the deep and the moderate NMB group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a moderate NMB, there was insufficient evidence to conclude that deep NMB improves surgical conditions during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Postoperative pulmonary function was substantially decreased after laparoscopic bariatric surgery independently of the NMB regime that was used. The study is limited by a small sample size