Objective identification of upper limb tremor in multiple sclerosis using a wrist-worn motion sensor: establishing validity and reliability

Introduction Over 25% of people with multiple sclerosis experience tremor, which may impact on activities of daily living and quality of life. Yet there is no method to objectively measure tremor and effectiveness of interventions on tremor. This study aimed to test validity and reliability of a new objective measurement for upper limb tremor in people with multiple sclerosis. Method Twelve participants with multiple sclerosis who self-reported tremor were observed performing standardised tasks. Validity and reliability of a new method to detect tremor from wrist movement was established against occupational therapist observation of tremor (FAHN). Concurrent validity of severity (displacement) of tremor was assessed. Responsiveness to change in tremor characteristics was explored in a sub-set of participants using weighted wrist-cuffs. Results The new method correctly predicted 98.2% of tremor cases identified by the occupational therapist, with high sensitivity (0.988) and specificity (0.976). Calculated displacement of tremor correlated with FAHN tremor severity scores moderately (rs = .452, p = .004). The new measure was responsive to changes in tremor characteristics due to change in weight of wrist-cuffs. Conclusion The new method of characterising tremor in those with multiple sclerosis demonstrated excellent validity and reliability in relation to tremor identified by an occupational therapist, and could provide valuable objective insight into the efficacy of interventions. </jats:sec

Simultaneous bilaternal training for improving arm function after stroke

Background Simultaneous bilateral training, the completion of identical activities with both arms simultaneously, is one intervention to improve arm function and reduce impairment. Objectives To determine the effects of simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Stroke Trials Register (last searched August 2009) and 10 electronic bibliographic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2009), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED (August 2009). We also searched reference lists and trials registers. Selection criteria Randomised trials in adults after stroke, where the intervention was simultaneous bilateral training compared to placebo or no intervention, usual care or other upper limb (arm) interventions. Primary outcomes were performance in activities of daily living (ADL) and functional movement of the upper limb. Secondary outcomes were performance in extended activities of daily living and motor impairment of the arm. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently screened abstracts, extracted data and appraised trials. Assessment of methodological quality was undertaken for allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessor, intention-to-treat, baseline similarity and loss to follow up. Main results We included 18 studies involving 549 relevant participants, of which 14 (421 participants) were included in the analysis (one within both comparisons). Four of the 14 studies compared the effects of bilateral training with usual care. Primary outcomes: results were not statistically significant for performance in ADL (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.14 to 0.63); functional movement of the arm (SMD -0.07, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.28) or hand (SMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.42). Secondary outcomes: no statistically significant results. Eleven of the 14 studies compared the effects of bilateral training with other specific upper limb (arm) interventions. Primary outcomes: no statistically significant results for performance of ADL (SMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.08); functional movement of the arm (SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.09) or hand (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.51 to 0.09). Secondary outcomes: one study reported a statistically significant result in favour of another upper limb intervention for performance in extended ADL. No statistically significant differences were found for motor impairment outcomes. Authors' conclusions There is insufficient good quality evidence to make recommendations about the relative effect of simultaneous bilateral training compared to placebo, no intervention or usual care. We identified evidence that suggests that bilateral training may be no more (or less) effective than usual care or other upper limb interventions for performance in ADL, functional movement of the upper limb or motor impairment outcome

A real-time algorithm for the detection of compensatory movements during reaching

Introduction: Interactive game systems can motivate stroke survivors to engage with their rehabilitation exercises. However, it is crucial that systems are in place to detect if exercises are performed correctly as stroke survivors often perform compensatory movements which can be detrimental to recovery. Very few game systems integrate motion tracking algorithms to monitor performance and detect such movements. This paper describes the development of algorithms which monitor for compensatory movements during upper limb reaching movements in real-time and provides quantitative metrics for health professionals to monitor performance and progress over time. Methods: A real-time algorithm was developed to analyse reaching motions in real-time through a low-cost depth camera. The algorithm segments cyclical reaching motions into component parts, including compensatory movement, and provides a graphical representation of task performance. Healthy participants (n = 10) performed reaching motions facing the camera. The real-time accuracy of the algorithm was assessed by comparing offline analysis to real-time collection of data. Results: The algorithm’s ability to segment cyclical reaching motions and detect the component parts in real-time was assessed. Results show that movement types can be detected in real time with accuracy, showing a maximum error of 1.71%. Conclusions: Using the methods outlined, the real-time detection and quantification of compensatory movements is feasible for integration within home-based, repetitive task practice game systems for people with stroke

International consensus recommendations for outcome measurement in post-stroke arm rehabilitation trials

Background: Existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of arm rehabilitation interventions after stroke use a wide range of outcome measures, limiting ability to pool data to determine efficacy. Published recommendations also lack stroke survivor, carer and clinician involvement specifically about perceived relevance and importance of outcomes and measures. Aim: To generate international consensus recommendations for selection of outcome measures for use in future stroke RCTs in arm rehabilitation, considering outcomes important to stroke survivors, carers and clinicians. The recommendations are the Standardizing Measurement in Arm Rehabilitation Trials (SMART) Toolbox. Design: Two-round international e-Delphi Survey and consensus meeting. Setting: Online and University. Population : Fifty-five researchers and clinicians with expertise in stroke upper limb rehabilitation from 18 countries (e-Delphi); N.=13 researchers and clinicians, N.=2 stroke survivors, N.=1 carer (consensus meeting). Methods: Using systematically identified outcome measures from published RCTs, we conducted a two-round international e-Delphi Survey with researchers and clinicians to identify the most important measures for inclusion in the toolbox. Measures that achieved ≥60% consensus were categorized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework (ICF); psychometric properties were ascertained from literature and research resources. At a final consensus meeting, expert stakeholders selected measures for inclusion in the toolbox. Results: e-Delphi participants recommended 28/170 measures for discussion at the final consensus meeting. Expert stakeholders (N.=16) selected the Visual Analogue Scale for pain/0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale, dynamometry, Action Research Arm Test, Wolf Motor Function Test, Barthel Index, Motricity Index and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (upper limb section of each), Box and Block Test, Motor Activity Log 14, Nine Hole Peg Test, Functional Independence Measure, EQ-5D, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and Modified Rankin Scale for inclusion in the toolbox. Conclusions: The SMART Toolbox provides a refined selection of measures that capture outcomes considered important by stakeholders for each ICF domain. Clinical rehabilitation impact: The toolbox will facilitate data aggregation for efficacy analyses thereby strengthening evidence to inform clinical practice. Clinicians can also use the toolbox to guide selection of measures ensuring a patient-centered focus

Pilot study for a randomised controlled trial of home based reach to grasp training for people after stroke: Exercise manual

As part of the 'Reach to Grasp pilot study', an exercise manual was produced to describe the intervention as clearly as possible. An instruction manual describing the intervention is available on the repository also

Pilot study for a randomised controlled trial of home based reach to grasp training for people after stroke: Instruction manual for exercise manual

This is the instruction manual for the exercise manual produced to describe the intervention in the 'Reach to Grasp pilot study' as clearly as possible