Home-range sizes of resident coyotes regressed against the percentages of agricultural habitats within home ranges (<i>r</i>² = 0.39, <i>P</i> < 0.001).

<p>Home-range sizes of resident coyotes regressed against the percentages of agricultural habitats within home ranges (<i>r</i>² = 0.39, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p

Habitat availability and habitat proportions of space used by resident and transient coyotes in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>Asterisks above the bars represent statistical differences among areas within habitat classes (<i>P</i> < 0.05, Tukey’s test). Study area proportions are shown for reference.</p

Map of the Albemarle Peninsula of northeastern North Carolina with primary habitat types during 2009–2011.

<p>Map of the Albemarle Peninsula of northeastern North Carolina with primary habitat types during 2009–2011.</p

Relative probability of 3^rd-order habitat selection by transient coyotes across the Albemarle Peninsula in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>Relative probability of 3^rd-order habitat selection by transient coyotes across the Albemarle Peninsula in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

Mean (± SE) body mass, age, and space use of resident and transient coyotes in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>¹Growing season space use was defined as areas used during March through August.</p><p>²Harvest season space use was defined as areas used during September through February.</p><p>³Composite space use was defined as the total area used.</p><p>⁴95% probability contour calculated from dynamic Brownian bridge movement models used to estimate the sizes of resident home ranges and transient ranges.</p><p>⁵50% probability contour calculated from dynamic Brownian bridge movement models used to estimate the sizes of resident core areas and transient biding areas.</p><p>Mean (± SE) body mass, age, and space use of resident and transient coyotes in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

Relative probability of 3^rd-order habitat selection by resident coyotes across the Albemarle Peninsula in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>Relative probability of 3^rd-order habitat selection by resident coyotes across the Albemarle Peninsula in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

Transient locations and estimated home ranges of coyotes 505M and 613M in eastern North Carolina.

<p>Coyote 505M was monitored as a transient from 16 April 2009 until 31 May 2009. Coyote 505M established a territory approximately 1 June 2009 and maintained it until 27 October 2009 when he was displaced by a neighboring red wolf pack. Coyote 613M was monitored as a transient from 7 January 2011 until 4 April 2011. Coyote 613M established a territory approximately 5 April 2011 after the resident red wolf pack dissolved after the death of a breeder. Coyote 613M was monitored as a resident from 5 April 2011 until 16 August 2012 when his GPS collar failed.</p

Kamath et al_Yellowstone grizzly bear input files

Input files used to evaluate grizzly bear recent trends in diversity, generation interval and effective population size

Locations of mammalian carnivore surveys and kernel density surface of Getis-Ord Gi* <i>z</i> scores of weighted ranking of IUCN red list categories for recorded species locations in Peninsular Malaysia, 1948–2014.

<p>Hillshade layer derived from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (STRM) 90-m Digital Elevation Data from Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and reprinted under a CC BY license, with permission from International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), original copyright 2004. Protected areas mentioned in the text are labeled; reprinted from World Database on Protected Areas (http://<a href="http://www.protectedplanet.net/" target="_blank">www.protectedplanet.net</a>) under a CC BY license, with permission from the United Nations Environmental Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, original copyright 2010.</p

Distribution of surveys (<i>n</i> = 133) of carnivores among different states in Peninsular Malaysia with records collected during 1948–2014.

<p>Data were based on 60 published papers and reports that used conventional trapping, direct observation, signs, remote cameras, or road kills. Some publications compiled data from several surveys and some geographic locations were surveyed more than once. Boundary layer: U.S. State Department, Humanitarian Information Unit (modified from Global Large Scale International Boundary Polygons). Inset map: U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (The World Factbook).</p