121 research outputs found

    Fractal analyses reveal independent complexity and predictability of gait

    Get PDF
    Locomotion is a natural task that has been assessed for decades and used as a proxy to highlight impairments of various origins. So far, most studies adopted classical linear analyses of spatio-temporal gait parameters. Here, we use more advanced, yet not less practical, non-linear techniques to analyse gait time series of healthy subjects. We aimed at finding more sensitive indexes related to spatio-temporal gait parameters than those previously used, with the hope to better identify abnormal locomotion. We analysed large-scale stride interval time series and mean step width in 34 participants while altering walking direction (forward vs. backward walking) and with or without galvanic vestibular stimulation. The Hurst exponent α and the Minkowski fractal dimension D were computed and interpreted as indexes expressing predictability and complexity of stride interval time series, respectively. These holistic indexes can easily be interpreted in the framework of optimal movement complexity. We show that α and D accurately capture stride interval changes in function of the experimental condition. Walking forward exhibited maximal complexity (D) and hence, adaptability. In contrast, walking backward and/or stimulation of the vestibular system decreased D. Furthermore, walking backward increased predictability (α) through a more stereotyped pattern of the stride interval and galvanic vestibular stimulation reduced predictability. The present study demonstrates the complementary power of the Hurst exponent and the fractal dimension to improve walking classification. Our developments may have immediate applications in rehabilitation, diagnosis, and classification procedures

    The gravitational forces as fundamental input for sensorimotor coordination

    No full text
    Any motor action results from a complex combination of motor commands that control the muscular forces and produce the desired movement. For this purpose, the motor commands must continuously compensate for the action of external forces acting on the body, of which the omnipresent gravitational forces. As a consequence, an internal knowledge of the movement dynamics, including the effect of gravitational forces, is essential in order to achieve successful movements. Evidence for such internal representation can be found in existing studies, but the role that gravity plays in the internal models of dynamics remains a challenging problem. The present thesis uses an experimental and modeling approaches in order to better understand the role played by gravity in sensorimotor coordination. This thesis shows that motor behavior in hypergravity (1.8 times terrestrial gravity) is consistent with the hypothesis the motor commands are optimized, taking into account the action of gravitational forces on the limb in the optimization process. In addition, forces applied by the subjects on a manipulated object were in direct support to the fact that the object weight was used by the brain for calibrating the internal models of dynamics. These results gave significant insight on the problem of sensorimotor coordination in weightlessness (0 g), given that the sensory information resulting from the action of gravity on the limbs is lost. The results confirm that internal representation of dynamics adapts to the 0 g condition, but it suffers from more uncertainty and, therefore, potentially affects the movement stability. A stabilizing mechanism that accounts for the experimental results is proposed as model for motor behavior under uncertain internal representation of dynamics.(FSA 3) -- UCL, 201

    Task Instructions and the Need for Feedback Correction Influence the Contribution of Visual Errors to Reach Adaptation

    No full text
    Previous research has questioned whether motor adaptation is shaped by an optimal combination of multisensory error signals. Here, we expanded on this work by investigating how the use of visual and somatosensory error signals during online correction influences single-trial adaptation. To this end, we exposed participants to a random sequence of force-field perturbations and recorded their corrective responses as well as the after-effects exhibited during the subsequent unperturbed movement. In addition to the force perturbation, we artificially decreased or increased visual errors by multiplying hand deviations by a gain smaller or larger than one. Corrective responses to the force perturbation clearly scaled with the size of the visual error, but this scaling did not transfer one-to-one to motor adaptation and we observed no consistent interaction between limb and visual errors on adaptation. However, reducing visual errors during perturbation led to a small reduction of after-effects and this residual influence of visual feedback was eliminated when we instructed participants to control their hidden hand instead of the visual hand cursor. Taken together, our results demonstrate that task instructions and the need to correct for errors during perturbation are important factors to consider if we want to understand how the sensorimotor system uses and combines multimodal error signals to adapt movements

    Adaptive Feedback Control in Human Reaching Adaptation to Force Fields

    No full text
    Sensorimotor adaptation is a central function of the nervous system, as it allows humans and other animals to flexibly anticipate their interaction with the environment. In the context of human reaching adaptation to force fields, studies have traditionally separated feedforward (FF) and feedback (FB) processes involved in the improvement of behavior. Here, we review computational models of FF adaptation to force fields and discuss them in light of recent evidence highlighting a clear involvement of feedback control. Instead of a model in which FF and FB mechanisms adapt in parallel, we discuss how online adaptation in the feedback control system can explain both trial-by-trial adaptation and improvements in online motor corrections. Importantly, this computational model combines sensorimotor control and short-term adaptation in a single framework, offering novel perspectives for our understanding of human reaching adaptation and control

    Filtering compensation for delays and prediction errors during sensorimotor control

    No full text
    Compensating for sensorimotor noise and for temporal delays has been identified as major functions of the nervous system. However, the aspects have often been described separately in the frameworks of optimal cue combination or motor prediction during movement planning. But control theoretic models suggest that these two operations are performed simultaneously, and mounting evidence supports that motor commands are based on sensory predictions rather than sensory states. In this paper we study the benefit of state estimation for predictive sensorimotor control. More precisely, we combine explicit compensation for sensorimotor delays and optimal estimation derived in the context of Kalman filtering. We show, based on simulations of human-­‐inspired eye and arm movements, that filtering sensory predictions improve the stability margin of the system against prediction errors due to low-­‐dimensional predictions, or to errors in the delay estimate. These simulations also highlight that prediction errors qualitatively account for a broad variety of movement disorders typically associated with cerebellar dysfunctions. We suggest that adaptive filtering in cerebellum, instead of often-­‐assumed feed-­‐forward predictions, may achieve simple compensation for sensorimotor delays and support stable closed-­‐loop control of movements

    Priors Engaged in Long-Latency Responses to Mechanical Perturbations Suggest a Rapid Update in State Estimation

    Get PDF
    In every motor task, our brain must handle external forces acting on the body. For example, riding a bike on cobblestones or skating on irregular surface requires us to appropriately respond to external perturbations. In these situations, motor predictions cannot help anticipate the motion of the body induced by external factors, and direct use of delayed sensory feedback will tend to generate instability. Here, we show that to solve this problem the motor system uses a rapid sensory prediction to correct the estimated state of the limb. We used a postural task with mechanical perturbations to address whether sensory predictions were engaged in upper-limb corrective movements. Subjects altered their initial motor response in ∌60 ms, depending on the expected perturbation profile, suggesting the use of an internal model, or prior, in this corrective process. Further, we found trial-to-trial changes in corrective responses indicating a rapid update of these perturbation priors. We used a computational model based on Kalman filtering to show that the response modulation was compatible with a rapid correction of the estimated state engaged in the feedback response. Such a process may allow us to handle external disturbances encountered in virtually every physical activity, which is likely an important feature of skilled motor behaviour

    Human reaching control in dynamic environments

    No full text
    Closed-loop models of movement control have attracted growing interest in how the nervous system transforms sensory information into motor commands, and several brain structures have been identified as neural substrates for these computational operations. Recently, several studies have focused on how these models need to be updated when environmental parameters change. Current evidence suggests that when the task changes, rapid control updates enable flexible modifications of current actions and online decisions. At the same time, when movement dynamics change, humans use different strategies based on a combination of adaptation and modulation of controller sensitivity to exogenous perturbations (robust control). This review proposes a unified framework to capture these results based on online estimation of model parameters with dynamic updates in control. The reviewed studies also identify the time scales of associated behavioral mechanisms to guide future research on the neural basis of movement control

    Long-latency reflexes for inter-effector coordination reflect a continuous state-feedback controller

    No full text
    Successful performance in many everyday tasks requires compensating unexpected mechanical disturbance to our limbs and body. The long-latency reflex plays an important role in this process as it is the fastest response to integrate sensory information across several effectors, like when linking the elbow and shoulder, or the arm and body. Despite the dozens of studies on inter-effector long-latency reflexes there has not been a comprehensive treatment of how these reveal the basic control organization, which set constraints on any candidate model of neural feedback control such as optimal feedback control. We considered three contrasting ways that controllers can be organized: multiple independent controllers versus multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) controller, continuous feedback controller versus intermittent feedback controller, and direct MIMO controller versus state-feedback controller. Following a primer on control theory and review of the relevant evidence, we conclude that continuous state-feedback control best describes the organization of inter-effector coordination by the long-latency reflex

    Rapid changes in movement representations during human reaching could be preserved in memory for at least 850ms

    No full text
    Humans adapt to mechanical perturbations such as force fields during reaching within tens of trials. However, recent findings suggested that this adaptation may start within one single trial, i.e., online corrective movements can become tuned to the unanticipated perturbations within a trial. This was highlighted in previous works with a reaching experiment in which participants had to stop at a via-point (VP) located between the start and the goal. A force field was applied during the first and second parts of the movement and then occasionally unexpectedly switched off at the VP during catch trials. The results showed an after-effect during the second part of the movement when participants exited the VP. This behavioural result was interpreted as a standard after-effect, but it remained unclear how it was related to conventional trial-by-trial learning. The current study aimed to investigate how long do such changes in movement representations last in memory. For this, we have studied the same reaching task with VP in two situations: one with very short residing time in the VP and the second with an imposed minimum 500ms dwell time in the VP. In both situations, during the unexpected absence of the force field after VP, after-effects were observed. This suggests that online corrections to the internal representation of reach dynamics can be preserved in memory for around 850ms of resting time on average. Therefore, rapid changes occurring within movements can thus be preserved in memory long enough to influence trial-by-trial motor adaptation

    Savings in Human Force Field Learning Supported by Feedback Adaptation

    No full text
    Savings have been described as the ability of healthy humans to relearn a previously acquired motor skill faster than the first time, which in the context of motor adaptation suggests that the learning rate in the brain could be adjusted when a perturbation is recognized. Alternatively, it has been argued that apparent savings were the consequence of a distinct process that instead of reflecting a change in the learning rate, revealed an explicit re-aiming strategy. Based on recent evidence that feedback adaptation may be central to both planning and control, we hypothesized that this component could genuinely accelerate relearning in human adaptation to force fields (FFs) during reaching. Consistent with our hypothesis, we observed that on re-exposure to a previously learned FF, the very first movement performed by healthy volunteers in the relearning context was better adapted to the external disturbance, and this occurred without any anticipation or cognitive strategy because the relearning session was started unexpectedly. We conclude that feedback adaptation is a medium by which the nervous system can genuinely accelerate learning across movements
    • 

    corecore